| Literature DB >> 24135813 |
Jingxia Wu1, Jingye Li, Bo Deng, Haiqing Jiang, Ziqiang Wang, Ming Yu, Linfan Li, Chenyang Xing, Yongjin Li.
Abstract
Self-healing of the superhydrophobic cotton fabric (SCF) obtained by the radiation-induced graft polymerization of lauryl methacrylate (LMA) and n-hexyl methacrylate (HMA), can be achieved by ironing. Through the steam ironing process, the superhydrophobicity of the SCFs will be regenerated even after the yarns are ruptured during the abrasion test under a load pressure of 44.8 kPa. SCFs made from LMA grafted cotton fabric can ultimately withstand at least 24,000 cycles of abrasion with periodic steam ironing. The FT-IR microscope results show that the migration of the polymethacrylates graft chains from the interior to the surface is responsible for the self-healing effect.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24135813 PMCID: PMC3798042 DOI: 10.1038/srep02951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1a) The kinetic curves of the radiation induced graft polymerization of the alkyl methacrylate onto the cotton fabrics which present the dependence of the DG on the concentration of the monomers in methanol; b) The dependence of the CA on the DG of those cotton fabrics which are graft polymerized with LMA and HMA; c) The digital image of water droplet sit on the LMA grafted cotton fabric (Cotton-g-PLMA) with DG of 21.8%; d) SEM image of the pristine cotton fabric; e) SEM image of the LMA grafted cotton fabric (Cotton-g-PLMA) with DG of 21.8%; f) SEM image of the HMA grafted cotton fabric (Cotton-g-PHMA) with DG of 37.0%.
Figure 2a) CA value versus the abrasion cycles of the Cotton-g-PHMA (DG = 37.0%) and the Cotton-g-PLMA (DG = 21.8%); Inserted images: the image of a water droplet on the Cotton-g-PLMA (DG = 21.8%) before (left) and after (right) an abrasion test of 9,000 cycles; b) SEM image of the Cotton-g-PHMA (DG = 37.0%) after an abrasion test of 8,000 cycles; c) SEM image of the Cotton-g-PLMA (DG = 21.8%) after an abrasion test of 9,000 cycles; d) The temperature measuring of the iron. e) CA value before and after the steam ironing versus the abrasion cycles of the Cotton-g-PHMA (DG = 37.0%); f) CA value before and after the steam ironing versus the abrasion cycles of the Cotton-g-PLMA (DG = 21.8%).
Figure 3a) Microscopic FT-IR spectra of the cross-section of a single yarn of the Cotton-g-PHMA with the testing step of 20 μm from the center; b) The relationship between the peaks' intensity of the ether group and the methylene group and the distance from the center in the yarn; c) Microscopic FT-IR spectra of the cross-section of a single yarn of the Cotton-g-PHMA after the abrasion test; d) The relationship between the peaks' intensity of the ether group and the methylene group and the distance from the center in the yarn; e) Microscopic FT-IR spectra of the cross-section of a single yarn of the Cotton-g-PHMA after abrasion test and then steam ironing; f) The relationship between the peaks' intensity of the ether group and the methylene group and the distance from the center of the yarn.
Figure 4a) CA value before and after the steam ironing for every 2,000 abrasion cycles versus the abrasion cycles of the Cotton-g-PHMA; b) CA value before and after the steam ironing for every 2,000 abrasion cycles versus the abrasion cycles of the Cotton-g-PLMA.