Literature DB >> 24135482

Prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for solitary large pelvic kidney stones.

Vishwajeet Singh1, Rahul Janak Sinha, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Mohit Pandey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We performed a prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy (RP) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for solitary pelvic stones >3 cm and assessed the outcome results.
METHODS: From 2010 to 2012, 44 patients with a solitary pelvic stone >3 cm without any anatomical abnormality were randomized to either RP or PNL on a 1:1 ratio. Stone-free rate, number of procedures per patient and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The stone-free rate on the first postoperative day was 95.5% in the RP group versus 72.7% in the PNL group (p = 0.04). The stone-free rates at 3 months were similar between the two groups. Blood loss, visual pain analog score and analgesic requirement on the first postoperative day were significantly higher in the PNL group whereas the mean operative time and overall complications were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In patients with solitary large pelvic stones, RP is associated with lesser blood loss, postoperative pain and analgesia as well as with a higher stone-free rate in the immediate postoperative period in comparison to PNL. However, the stone clearance rate remains the same at 3 months in both groups.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24135482     DOI: 10.1159/000353973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  10 in total

1.  [Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm].

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Jiu-Min Liu; Xue-Cheng Bi; Dong Li; Shang Huang; Yan-Hua Feng; Chu-Qi Lin
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-02-20

Review 2.  Comparison of laparoscopic stone surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large upper urinary stones: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenming Zhao; Huan Yang; Kun Tang; Ding Xia; Hua Xu; Zhiqiang Chen; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Bilateral Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithomy: Dare You Do This?

Authors:  Maher Abdessater; Anthony Kanbar; Joey El Khoury; Charbel El Hachem; Rami Halabi; Halim Akl; Johnny Boustany; Raghid El Khoury
Journal:  J Endourol Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 4.  Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for stone disease.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous lithotripsy to treat renal stones 2-3 cm in diameter.

Authors:  Kursad Zengin; Serhat Tanik; Nihat Karakoyunlu; Nevzat Can Sener; Sebahattin Albayrak; Can Tuygun; Hasan Bakirtas; M Abdurrahim Imamoglu; Mesut Gurdal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Difference of opinion--In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: YES.

Authors:  J F Donaldson
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tie Mao; Na Wei; Jing Yu; Yinghui Lu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 8.  Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yunjin Bai; Yin Tang; Lan Deng; Xiaoming Wang; Yubo Yang; Jia Wang; Ping Han
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy as a monotherapy for the management of intermediate-sized renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Musliyarakath Mujeeburahiman; Chembili Vipin
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 10.  Robotic Management of Urolithiasis in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Natalia Ballesteros; Zachary A Snow; Paulo R M Moscardi; George A Ransford; Pablo Gomez; Miguel Castellan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.418

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.