OBJECTIVE: To propose strategies and recommendations for future planning and deployment of field hospitals after earthquakes by comparing the experience of 4 field hospitals deployed by The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Medical Corps in Armenia, Turkey, India and Haiti. METHODS: Quantitative data regarding the earthquakes were collected from published sources; data regarding hospital activity were collected from IDF records; and qualitative information was obtained from structured interviews with key figures involved in the missions. RESULTS: The hospitals started operating between 89 and 262 hours after the earthquakes. Their sizes ranged from 25 to 72 beds, and their personnel numbered between 34 and 100. The number of patients treated varied from 1111 to 2400. The proportion of earthquake-related diagnoses ranged from 28% to 67% (P < .001), with hospitalization rates between 3% and 66% (P < .001) and surgical rates from 1% to 24% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of characteristic scenarios and injury patterns after earthquakes, patient caseload and treatment requirements varied widely. The variables affecting the patient profile most significantly were time until deployment, total number of injured, availability of adjacent medical facilities, and possibility of evacuation from the disaster area. When deploying a field hospital in the early phase after an earthquake, a wide variability in patient caseload should be anticipated. Customization is difficult due to the paucity of information. Therefore, early deployment necessitates full logistic self-sufficiency and operational versatility. Also, collaboration with local and international medical teams can greatly enhance treatment capabilities.
OBJECTIVE: To propose strategies and recommendations for future planning and deployment of field hospitals after earthquakes by comparing the experience of 4 field hospitals deployed by The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Medical Corps in Armenia, Turkey, India and Haiti. METHODS: Quantitative data regarding the earthquakes were collected from published sources; data regarding hospital activity were collected from IDF records; and qualitative information was obtained from structured interviews with key figures involved in the missions. RESULTS: The hospitals started operating between 89 and 262 hours after the earthquakes. Their sizes ranged from 25 to 72 beds, and their personnel numbered between 34 and 100. The number of patients treated varied from 1111 to 2400. The proportion of earthquake-related diagnoses ranged from 28% to 67% (P < .001), with hospitalization rates between 3% and 66% (P < .001) and surgical rates from 1% to 24% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of characteristic scenarios and injury patterns after earthquakes, patient caseload and treatment requirements varied widely. The variables affecting the patient profile most significantly were time until deployment, total number of injured, availability of adjacent medical facilities, and possibility of evacuation from the disaster area. When deploying a field hospital in the early phase after an earthquake, a wide variability in patient caseload should be anticipated. Customization is difficult due to the paucity of information. Therefore, early deployment necessitates full logistic self-sufficiency and operational versatility. Also, collaboration with local and international medical teams can greatly enhance treatment capabilities.
Authors: Charles A Coventry; Ashish I Vaska; Andrew J A Holland; David J Read; Rebecca Q Ivers Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Mohammad Javad Moradian; Ali Ardalan; Amir Nejati; Ali Darvishi Boloorani; Ali Akbarisari; Behnaz Rastegarfar Journal: Bull Emerg Trauma Date: 2016-07
Authors: Elhanan Bar-On; Asaf Vivante; David Dagan; Yoel Har Even; Galia Barkai; Ariel Furer; Michael Bass; Michal Kirshenbaum; Omer Niv; Leonid Barski; Adam Lee Goldstein; Rami Sagi; Danny Moshayov; Shani Brosh; Michal Mekel; Eldad Katorza; Yitshak Kreiss Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2022-10-16 Impact factor: 7.664
Authors: Elizabeth A Newnham; Peta L Dzidic; Enrique L P Mergelsberg; Bhushan Guragain; Emily Ying Yang Chan; Yoshiharu Kim; Jennifer Leaning; Ryoma Kayano; Michael Wright; Lalindra Kaththiriarachchi; Hiroshi Kato; Tomoko Osawa; Lisa Gibbs Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 3.390