Literature DB >> 24134898

Accuracy of providers' assessment of pain during intrauterine device insertion.

Karla Maguire1, Kathleen Morrell, Carolyn Westhoff, Anne Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Providers often underestimate patient pain. This study investigated if providers accurately assess pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Participants rated pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Providers marked a similar VAS for maximum level and timing of participant pain.
RESULTS: The mean patient maximum pain was 64.8 mm (SD, 27) compared to 35.3 mm (SD, 26) rated by the provider (p<.001). Patient and provider agreement on most painful time point of procedure was weak (kappa statistic, 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: Providers underestimate pain during IUD insertion. IMPLICATIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first paper to compare provider and patient perceptions of pain during IUD insertion. Understanding this relationship will help guide further research about IUD insertion pain and techniques and could improve patient counseling.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IUD insertion; Intrauterine device insertion; Pain; Provider perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24134898     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  2 in total

1.  Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Tegan A Hunter; Sarita Sonalkar; Courtney A Schreiber; Lisa K Perriera; Mary D Sammel; Aletha Y Akers
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 2.  Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul A O'Brien; David Hubacher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.