| Literature DB >> 24134883 |
Bartosz Kempisty1, Hanna Piotrowska2, Marta Rybska3, Magdalena Woźna2, Paweł Antosik3, Dorota Bukowska3, Piotr Zawierucha4, Sylwia Ciesiółka4, Jędrzej M Jaśkowski3, Michał Nowicki4, Klaus-Peter Brüssow5, Maciej Zabel4.
Abstract
The current study aimed to investigate differential expression of inhibin βA (INHβA) and inhibin βB (INHβB) in porcine oocytes before or after in vitro maturation (IVM) isolated from follicles of various sizes. Porcine oocytes isolated from large, medium and small follicles (40 from each) were used to study the INHβA and INHβB protein expression pattern using western blot analysis before or after 44 h of oocyte IVM. An increased expression of INHβA was found in oocytes collected from large and medium follicles compared with small follicles before or after IVM (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, respectively). Similarly, higher INHβB levels were observed in oocytes recovered from large follicles compared with small (P < 0.01). As INHβA and INHβB are expressed in both porcine follicular somatic cells and oocytes, it can be assumed that these transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) superfamily factors are involved in the regulation of molecular bi-directional pathways during follicle and oocyte development, and can be recognized as markers of follicle and oocyte maturation. Moreover, the current study clearly demonstrated that inhibin expression is substantially associated with porcine follicle growth and development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24134883 PMCID: PMC4413872 DOI: 10.1017/S0967199413000439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zygote ISSN: 0967-1994 Impact factor: 1.442
Figure 1Western blot and optical density analysis of INHβA and INHβB proteins expression before in vitro maturation (IVM). A goat polyclonal anti-INHβA antibody (Ab) and goat polyclonal anti-INHβB Ab (A–D), followed by incubation with donkey anti-goat HRP-conjugated Abs, were used for western blot analysis. To equalize the protein loading, the membrane was reblotted with an anti-actin HRP-conjugated Ab. Optical density (OD) was evaluated using Gel Logic 200 Imaging System (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 were determined as the levels of significance and present the differences between the expression of INHβA and INHβB before IVM (A–D). Results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) with the level of significance, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. L, large follicles; M, medium follicles; S, small follicles.
Figure 2Western blot and optical density analysis of INHβA and INHβB proteins expression after in vitro maturation (IVM). A goat polyclonal anti-INHβA and goat polyclonal anti-INHβB Ab (A–D), followed by incubation with donkey anti-goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated Abs, were used for western blot analysis. To equalize the protein loading, the membrane was reblotted with an anti-actin HRP-conjugated Ab. Optical density (OD) was evaluated using Gel Logic 200 Imaging System (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 were determined as the levels of significance and present the differences between the expression of INHβA and INHβB after IVM (A–D). Results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) with the level of significance, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. L, large follicles; M, medium follicles; S, small follicles.