Patients with ovarian cancer (OC) may be treated with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, although none of these strategies are very effective. Several plant-based natural products/dietary supplements, including extracts from Emblicaofficinalis (Amla), have demonstrated potent anti-neoplastic properties. In this study we determined that Amla extract (AE) has anti-proliferative effects on OC cells under both in vitro and in vivo conditions. We also determined the anti-proliferative effects one of the components of AE, quercetin, on OC cells under in vitro conditions. AE did not induce apoptotic cell death, but did significantly increase the expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II under in vitro conditions. Quercetin also increased the expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II under in vitro conditions. AE also significantly reduced the expression of several angiogenic genes, including hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in OVCAR3 cells. AE acted synergistically with cisplatin to reduce cell proliferation and increase expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II under in vitro conditions. AE also had anti-proliferative effects and induced the expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II in mouse xenograft tumors. Additionally, AE reduced endothelial cell antigen - CD31 positive blood vessels and HIF-1α expression in mouse xenograft tumors. Together, these studies indicate that AE inhibits OC cell growth both in vitro and in vivo possibly via inhibition of angiogenesis and activation of autophagy in OC. Thus AE may prove useful as an alternative or adjunct therapeutic approach in helping to fight OC.
Patients with ovarian cancer (OC) may be treated with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, although none of these strategies are very effective. Several plant-based natural products/dietary supplements, including extracts from Emblicaofficinalis (Amla), have demonstrated potent anti-neoplastic properties. In this study we determined that Amla extract (AE) has anti-proliferative effects on OC cells under both in vitro and in vivo conditions. We also determined the anti-proliferative effects one of the components of AE, quercetin, on OC cells under in vitro conditions. AE did not induce apoptotic cell death, but did significantly increase the expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II under in vitro conditions. Quercetin also increased the expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II under in vitro conditions. AE also significantly reduced the expression of several angiogenic genes, including hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in OVCAR3 cells. AE acted synergistically with cisplatin to reduce cell proliferation and increase expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II under in vitro conditions. AE also had anti-proliferative effects and induced the expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II in mousexenograft tumors. Additionally, AE reduced endothelial cell antigen - CD31 positive blood vessels and HIF-1α expression in mousexenograft tumors. Together, these studies indicate that AE inhibits OC cell growth both in vitro and in vivo possibly via inhibition of angiogenesis and activation of autophagy in OC. Thus AE may prove useful as an alternative or adjunct therapeutic approach in helping to fight OC.
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the second most common gynecological cancer and is the leading
cause of cancer death in women in the United States [1]. Each year approximately 22,000 women in United States are diagnosed
with OC, and 15,000 deaths were attributable to OC in 2011 alone [1]. OC is difficult to diagnose at its early
stages (I/II), and is often not clinically suspected until it spreads and advances
to the later stages (III/IV). Consequently, OC has a poor prognosis, with a five
year survival rate for all stages of ~ 47% [2]. Currently, OC may be treated with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation,
with suboptimal results as indicated by the five year survival rate cited above. The
development of new anticancer drugs, or combinations of drugs for OC have not
provided significant reason to be optimistic. Since conventional anti-cancer drugs
can be highly toxic, plant-derived bioactive compounds are being investigated more
intensively as alternate or adjunct therapies for various forms of cancer [3]. Recent evidence suggests that plant extracts
have anti-tumor/anti-cancer/anti-proliferative effects on cultured humantumor cell
lines [4-7] and also have an antiangiogenic effect on cancer cell lines [8].Amla (
) is a fruited plant that
has been recognized for its medicinal value, and has been used since ancient times
in the Indian traditional system of medicine ‘Ayurveda’ for treating several
diseases including cancer [9-11]. The fruit of the Amla plant contains 11
known medicinally relevant components such as gallic acid, ellagic acid,
1-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose, 3,6-di-O-galloyl-D-glucose, chebulinic acid, quercetin,
chebulagic acid, corilagin, 1,6-di-O-gallolyl beta D glucose, 3-ethylgallic acid,
isostrictiniin and ascorbic acid [9]. The
branches of this plant contain seven bioactive compounds – geraniin,
phyllanemblinins C and E, prodelphinidin B1, (2)-epigallocatechin 3-O-gallate,
(S)-eriodictyol 7-[6-O-(E)-p-coumaroyl]-b-D-glucoside [12]. From among this collection of compounds, gallic acid,
ellagic acid, 1-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose, chebulinic acid, quercetin, chebulagic
acid, corilagin, ascorbic acid, and geraniin have demonstrated strong
anti-carcinogenic properties individually, and these may help explain the
anti-cancer properties of whole Amla extract (AE) [9,13]. AE has been shown to
inhibit proliferation of a variety of cancer cells in vitro,
including OC cells, and also has demonstrated anti-proliferative effects in
vivo [9-11]. Recently triphala, an herbal remedy containing AE, has
also demonstrated anti-angiogenesis properties [8].Due to the potential value of AE as an anti-cancer therapy, particularly for OC, we
have investigated the anti-proliferative and anti-tumorigenic effects of AE in
ovarian cell lines in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model. We have
also investigated the effect of AE on tumor angiogenesis in cultured cells and a
mouse xenograft model. We have observed that AE did not induce apoptotic cell death,
but did significantly increase the expression of the autophagic protein in tissue
culture and mouse xenograft model. We have also observed that AE acted
synergistically with cisplatin to reduce cell proliferation and increase expression
of beclin1 and LC3B-II under in vitro conditions.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
All the animals were maintained according to standard guidelines of American
Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. The study was
approved by the InstitutionalAnimal Care and Use Committee of the Kansas City VA Medical Center (Kansas City,
MO).
Cell culture and reagents
OVCAR3, SW626 and normal human placental cells (HS 799 pl) were obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection. Dulbeccos Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) and
trypsin were purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, MO. OVCAR3 and SW626 cells were
maintained in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT)
and antibiotics at 37 OC in a 5% CO2 environment. All
cells used in this study were within 10 passages after receipt or recovery (~2
and 1/2 months of culturing). AE for treatment was prepared from commercially
available tablets (Himalaya, USA, Houston, TX, containing 250 mg of Amla fruit
and 350 mg of Amla stem powder). A stock solution of AE was prepared by weighing
the Amla tablets, grinding them, and dissolving the powder in endotoxin free
sterile water at 10 mg/ml. The solution was filtered through a 0.02 µm cellulose
acetate membrane and used to treat the culture at different concentrations.
Treatment
10,000 OVCAR3 or SW626 cells were plated in individual wells of 24-well plates in
1 ml medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and incubated at 37 OC
for 24 h before the start of the experiments. After the initial plating, the
medium was replaced with 1 ml of DMEM containing serum (10%) and AE (0-400
µg/ml; in triplicate) for various time points (6-96 hours) at 37 OC.
The in vitro control (0 µg/ml of AE) received vehicle (water)
at a volume equal to the highest concentration of AE used. We also treated
OVCAR3 cells with different doses of quercetin (5-100 µg/ml; in quadruplicate)
for various time points (6-96 hours) at 37 OC. The in
vitro control (0 µg/ml of quercetin) received vehicle (DMSO; 4µl,
which is equivalent to the volume for 100 µg/ml of quercetin).
Cell proliferation
Cell proliferation was assessed using
[3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)] (MTT) assays as
described previously [14] with
modifications [15]. OVCAR3 and SW626
cells were grown in 24-well plates containing DMEM and 10% FBS. After treatment,
MTT (0.1 mg/well) was added to cells followed by incubation for 4 h at 37
OC. The formazan crystals formed were solubilized by incubating
the cells with 1 ml of isopropyl alcohol which dissolved the blue formazon
product that occurred during incubation with MTT. The optical density was
measured at 560 nM in a spectrophotometer. The number of functionally active
cells (i.e., optical density values) was calculated for comparisons between
control and treated groups.
DNA fragmentation
DNA was prepared from treated and untreated cultures as described previously
[16]. Briefly, after treatment the
cells were lysed in 100 µl of lysis buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA,
0.5% SDS) treated with 50 µg/ml DNase-free RNase at 37 OC for 30 min
and 100 µg/ml proteinase K for 2 h at 50 OC. The DNA was then
extracted with phenol-chloroform and chloroform and precipitated in 3 volumes of
ethanol. The DNA (1 µg/lane) was electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels. Molecular
weight standards were run concurrently. The gels were stained with ethidium
bromide and photographed using a Chemidox (BioRad, Hercules, CA).
RNA Extraction
Total RNA was extracted from OVCAR3 cells using Trizol extraction method. mRNA
quantity and quality were determined by measuring its absorbance in Genesys 6
Scanning UV/VIS Scanning Spectrophotometer and also using RNA experion chip
(BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
Gene Array
Differential expression of angiogenesis regulatory genes was analyzed using Oligo
GEArray provided by the manufacturer (SA Bioscience Corporation, Frederick, MD,
USA). Briefly, 3µg total RNA was reverse transcribed into
Biotin-16-dUTP-labelled cDNA probes with the TrueLabeling-AMP method using 16 µl
2.5X RNA polymerase, 2 µl 10 mM biotinylated UTP, RNA Polymerase 2 µl. The
SuperArray membranes (OHS-026) were pre-hybridized at 60 OC for 2
hours. Hybridization of the Biotin-labeled cDNA probes to the membranes was
carried out at 60 OC overnight with slow agitation. The hybridized
membranes were washed in salinesodium citrate buffer (once in 2x SSC, 1% SCS
and once in 0.1 x SSC, 0.5% SDS). The membranes were incubated with alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin, and then with the chemiluminescent
substrate CDP-Star. Images of the membranes were acquired using the Chemidoc XRS
system (BioRad) and the datasets were exported to GEArray Analyzer, the software
developed by SA Bioscience and analyzed. The relative expression level of each
gene was determined by comparing the signal intensity of each gene in the array
after correction for background and normalization.
In vivo tumor studies
Eight-week-old nude mice (nu/nu genotype, Harlan Laboratories (Madison, WI) were
maintained with water and food ad libitum in a pathogen free
environment with a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle in an animal care facility at
Kansas City VA Medical Center. Animal care and experimental procedures were
performed according to the approved Guidelines of the Animal Care and Use
Committee of Kansas City VA Medical Center. OVCAR3 cells (5X104) with
Matrigel were injected subcutaneously into the right rear flank of each mouse
(4-5 mice per group). Tumor growth was monitored after the 2nd day of
injection and continued up to 24 days. Tumor length and width were measured
using a caliper and the tumor volume was calculated using the formula: tumor
volume = length x width x 0.5 width.Six days after injection, mice were fed orally with 10% sucrose (control) or 10%
sucrose with AE (100 mg/kg body wt.) daily. The dose 100 mg/kg body weight was
chosen based on a preliminary study where this dose showed optimal effect on
inhibition of tumor growth. After 18 days of AE treatment, mice were sacrificed
and tumors were removed and fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for further
study.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4% formalin fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue
sections according to our previous methods [17,18]. Briefly, tissue
sections were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde and deparaffinized in xylene,
rehydrated in descending concentrations of alcohol, washed with PBS and blocked
with blocking serum (Immpress-Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 20
minutes. The sections were incubated with beclin1, LC3B-II (Cell Signaling,
Boston, MA), CD31, Ki67 (ABcam, Cambridge, MA) or Hif-1α (Novus Biologicals,
Littleton CO) antibody (1:500 for all antibodies) overnight in a moist chamber
at 4 OC. The immunoreactivity was detected using secondary antibodies
conjugated to streptavidin (Immpress-Vector Laboratories) and the sections were
counterstained with hematoxylin. The sections were imaged with a Leica digital
photomicroscope. For quantification of microvessels, tissue sections were
analyzed at 50X magnification and CD31-positive vessels were counted. Four areas
from each of 3 sections per tumor were analyzed.OVCAR3 cells were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde and washed in PBS. After
blocking in blocking serum, the cells were incubated with beclin1, LC3B-II or
Hif-1α (1:200) antibody overnight at 4 OC. The cells were washed and
immunoreactivity was detected as described above. The number of immunostained
cells and total cells were counted and the percentage of cells with
immunolabeling was calculated.
Western blot
Western blots were performed as previously described [19]. Briefly, the protein was extracted either from OVCAR3,
SW626 cells or from tumors and the concentration of protein was measured by the
BCA protein assay method (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Each sample (50 µg) was run on
an SDS-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel. The protein was transferred to
a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was incubated with blocking serum
(Thermoscientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 1 h at room temperature followed by
overnight incubation at 4 OC with antibody to Bax, Bcl2, Caspase 3,
cleaved caspase 3, Caspase 7, beclin1 or LC3B-II (1:1000, Cell Signaling) or
Hif-1α (1:1000, Abcam). After washing with Tris-NaCl-tween 20 buffer, the
membrane was incubated with secondary antibodies (1:10000, Abcam) at room
temperature for 1 h. Immunoreactivity was detected using enhanced
chemiluminescence (Thermoscientic).
Statistical analysis
Assays were performed in triplicate and each experiment was repeated twice. All
graphical data are displayed as mean + S.E.M.
Significance was tested using unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-Tests with
unequal variance (Microsoft Excel, Redmond, WA). p
< 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
AE inhibits OVCAR3 and SW626 cells proliferation
To determine if AE can affect the cell proliferation, we tested its effect on
three different cell lines: 1) an ovarian cancer cell (OVCAR3), 2) a primary
adenocarcinoma of the colon metastasized on ovary (SW626), 3) a normal human
placental cells (HS 799). Normal placental cells were used to determine if AE
has any effect on non-neoplastic cells. In addition, we used SW626 cells to
determine if AE is able to inhibit tumors that had metastasized from other sites
to the ovary, and to determine whether the effects of AE on OVCAR3 would be
duplicated with other cancer cells. OVCAR3 cells were treated with varying
concentrations of AE (0-1000 µg/ml) for 24 hour and the relative number of cells
was inferred using MTT assays. Low concentrations (10-200 µg/ml) of AE did not
affect cell proliferation; however, cell proliferation was significantly
inhibited at AE concentrations ranging from 300–1000 µg/ml (Figure 1A). We treated normal placental cells
(HS 799 pl) with different doses (100-500 µg/ml) of AE for 48 hour to determine
if AE was generally cytotoxic, and determined that AE had essentially no impact
on cell survival at any of the concentrations tested (Figure 1B). We treated both OVCAR3 and SW626
cells in culture with increasing concentrations of AE for various times prior to
performing MTT assays. Rapid loss of cell proliferation occurred with increasing
concentrations of AE in both OVCAR3 and SW626 cells (Figure 1A, 1C, 1D). In both cell lines, the
inhibition of cell proliferation induced by AE was dependent on both
concentration and incubation time (Figure 1C, 1D). The lowest concentration of AE tested (100 µg/ml)
caused significant inhibition (p=<0.001) of OVCAR3 cells by 72 hour, and the
highest dose (400 µg/ml) potently inhibited (p=<0.007) growth of OVCAR3 cells
by 12 hour (Figure 1C). In
SW626 cells, AE at 100 µg/ml caused significant inhibition by 48 hour (p=0.001),
and at the highest dose growth was inhibited (p=<0.001) by 6 hour (Figure 1D).
Figure 1
AE and quercetin treatment reduces cell proliferation and alters
morphology of OC cells.
A. Dose dependent effect of AE on proliferation of OVCAR3 cells. B. Dose
dependent effect of AE on cell death in normal placental cells (HS-799
pl). C–D. Time and Dose dependent effects of AE on proliferation OVCAR3
(C) and SW626 (D) cells. E. Dose dependent effect of quercetin on
proliferation of OVCAR3 cells. OVCAR3 and SW626 cells were cultured and
grown for 2 days in DMEM in presence of 10% serum as described under
Materials and Methods. After this period, the cultures were fed with
medium containing 10% serum and different doses of AE for 24 hours
except time dependent study. Data are the mean +
S.E.M. from 6 independent observations. *, p<0.05, significantly
different from vehicle-treated control group.
AE and quercetin treatment reduces cell proliferation and alters
morphology of OC cells.
A. Dose dependent effect of AE on proliferation of OVCAR3 cells. B. Dose
dependent effect of AE on cell death in normal placental cells (HS-799
pl). C–D. Time and Dose dependent effects of AE on proliferation OVCAR3
(C) and SW626 (D) cells. E. Dose dependent effect of quercetin on
proliferation of OVCAR3 cells. OVCAR3 and SW626 cells were cultured and
grown for 2 days in DMEM in presence of 10% serum as described under
Materials and Methods. After this period, the cultures were fed with
medium containing 10% serum and different doses of AE for 24 hours
except time dependent study. Data are the mean +
S.E.M. from 6 independent observations. *, p<0.05, significantly
different from vehicle-treated control group.
Quercetin inhibits cell proliferation in OVCAR3 cells
After determining that AE dose- and time-dependently reduced cell proliferation
in OVCAR3 cells, we tested whether treatment of OC cells with different doses
(0-100 µg/ml) of quercetin--one of the components of AE-- could reduce cell
proliferation in OVCAR3 cells. The lowest concentration of quercetin tested (5
µg/ml) caused significant inhibition (p=<0.01) of OVCAR3 cells by 48 hr, and
the highest dose (100 µg/ml) inhibited (p=<0.005) growth of OVCAR3 cells by
24 hr (Figure 1E).
AE changes the morphology of OVCAR3 and SW626 cells
Inhibition of proliferation may change the size and morphology of the individual
cells [20]. Therefore, we carefully
observed the morphology of OVCAR3 and SW626 cells after treatment with 0-300
µg/ml AE. The morphology of OVCAR3 cells treated with 100 and 200 µg/ml AE was
indistinguishable from untreated cells after 24 hour (Figure 2 A–C), whereas treatment with 300
µg/ml for 24 hour caused the majority of the cells to become round (Figure 2D). AE also induced
dose dependent alterations in the morphology of SW626 cells after 24 hour (Figure 2E–H). Closer
examination revealed that treatment with 300 µg/ml of AE for 24 hours induced
cytoplasmic vacuoles in both OVCAR3 and SW626 cells (Figures 2J, 2N, 2L, 2P). These morphologic changes suggest that
cell death may be occurring since cell death is sometimes accompanied by vacuole
formation [21]. Further experiments were
performed using 300 µg/ml concentration of AE.
Figure 2
AE treatment alters morphology of OC cells.
A–D. Dose dependent effect of AE on morphology and cell density of
OVCAR3: A = Control, B=100 µg/ml AE, C=200 µg/ml AE, D=300 µg/ml AE.
E–H. Dose dependent effect of AE on morphology and cell density of SW626
cells. E = Control, F=100 µg/ml AE, G=200 µg/ml AE, H=300 µg/ml AE. I–J,
M–N. AE increased cytoplasmic vacuoles in OVCAR3. I and M = Control, J
and N = 300 µg/ml AE. K–L and O–P. AE increased cytoplasmic vacuoles in
SW626. K and O = Control, L and P=300 µg/ml AE. OVCAR3 and SW626 cells
were cultured and grown for 2 days in DMEM in presence of 10% serum as
described under Materials and Methods. After this period, the cultures
were fed with medium 10% serum and different doses of AE for 24 hours.
Some of the vacuoles are indicated by arrows (N and P). Bar=50 µm.
AE treatment alters morphology of OC cells.
A–D. Dose dependent effect of AE on morphology and cell density of
OVCAR3: A = Control, B=100 µg/ml AE, C=200 µg/ml AE, D=300 µg/ml AE.
E–H. Dose dependent effect of AE on morphology and cell density of SW626
cells. E = Control, F=100 µg/ml AE, G=200 µg/ml AE, H=300 µg/ml AE. I–J,
M–N. AE increased cytoplasmic vacuoles in OVCAR3. I and M = Control, J
and N = 300 µg/ml AE. K–L and O–P. AE increased cytoplasmic vacuoles in
SW626. K and O = Control, L and P=300 µg/ml AE. OVCAR3 and SW626 cells
were cultured and grown for 2 days in DMEM in presence of 10% serum as
described under Materials and Methods. After this period, the cultures
were fed with medium 10% serum and different doses of AE for 24 hours.
Some of the vacuoles are indicated by arrows (N and P). Bar=50 µm.
AE did not cause apoptotic cell death in OVCAR3 and SW626 cells
In view of the morphologic changes described above, suggesting that treatment of
OC cell lines with 300 µg/ml of AE induced cell death, we wanted to determine
whether AE treatment induced apoptosis of these cell lines. We used two
different approaches to explore this possibility: 1) Examination of DNA for
internucleosomal fragmentation, a hallmark of apoptotic cell death, and; 2)
Western blotting for specific proteins (e.g. bax, bcl2, caspase 3,
cleaved caspase 3 and caspase 7) involved in the apoptotic pathway. To determine
if AE caused DNA internucleosomal fragmentation, DNA prepared from control and
AE-treated cultures was fractionated on 1% agarose gels 24 and 96 hours after
the addition of AE (300 µg/ml). Although DNA degradation was observed in these
preparations, there was no apparent DNA fragmentation even after 96 hours of
treatment (Figure 3A-B),
suggesting that cell death did not occur by apoptosis. To further explore the
potential role of apoptotic pathways in death of AE treated cells, Western blots
for bax, bcl2, caspase 3, cleaved caspase 3 and caspase 7 were
performed. In OVCAR3 cells, AE treatment reduced the expression of bax,
bcl2 and cleaved caspase 3 (Figure 3C, 3E and 3I), and did not change the
expression of caspase 3 or caspase 7 proteins (Figure 3G and 3K). In SW626 cells, AE
treatment did not change the expression of bax, bcl2, caspase3, or
caspase7 (Figures 3D, 3F,
3H and 3L) and reduced the expression
of cleaved caspase 3 (Figure
3J). Collectively, the results support the conclusion that apopotic
pathways are not activated in AE treated OC cell lines.
Figure 3
AE treatment does not cause apoptotic cell death.
A–B. Representative photographs of DNA fragmentation in OVCAR3 cells (A)
and SW626 cells (B). OVCAR3 and SW626 cells were treated with 300 µg/ml
AE as described in Materials and Methods. After treatment, DNA was
extracted and electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel. The size in base pairs
of the molecular weight markers (lane) is indicated alongside the gel.
The number on the right side indicates the length in nucleotides for
several of the bands. C24 = Control 24 hour, C96=Control 96 hour, T24=AE
24 hour treatment, T96=AE 96 hour treatment, +C=Positive control, S=DNA
size standard. C–L. Expressions of apoptotic proteins after AE treatment
(300 µg/ml) in OVCAR3 and SW626 cells. Representative photographs of
Western blot of Bax (C, D), Bcl2 (E, F), Caspase 3 (G, H),
cleaved Caspase 3 (I, J), Caspase 7 (K, L) in OVCAR3 (C, E, G, I, K) and
SW626 (D, F, H, J, L) cells after AE treatment are shown on the top.
β-actin was detected as a control for each blot. The histogram
corresponding to each photograph represents the ratio of densitometric
analysis of each band to the respective β-actin band. The culture was
treated with 0 or 300 µg/ml AE for 24 hour. After treatment, protein
from OVCAR3 and SW626 cells was extracted and 30 µg proteins were
electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE. The protein was then transferred to
nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted against apoptosis related
antibodies - Bax, Bcl2, Caspase 3, cleaved Caspase 3 or
Caspase 7. The values are means + S.E.M. of 4
independent experiments. *, p<0.05, as compared with control
group.
AE treatment does not cause apoptotic cell death.
A–B. Representative photographs of DNA fragmentation in OVCAR3 cells (A)
and SW626 cells (B). OVCAR3 and SW626 cells were treated with 300 µg/ml
AE as described in Materials and Methods. After treatment, DNA was
extracted and electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel. The size in base pairs
of the molecular weight markers (lane) is indicated alongside the gel.
The number on the right side indicates the length in nucleotides for
several of the bands. C24 = Control 24 hour, C96=Control 96 hour, T24=AE
24 hour treatment, T96=AE 96 hour treatment, +C=Positive control, S=DNA
size standard. C–L. Expressions of apoptotic proteins after AE treatment
(300 µg/ml) in OVCAR3 and SW626 cells. Representative photographs of
Western blot of Bax (C, D), Bcl2 (E, F), Caspase 3 (G, H),
cleaved Caspase 3 (I, J), Caspase 7 (K, L) in OVCAR3 (C, E, G, I, K) and
SW626 (D, F, H, J, L) cells after AE treatment are shown on the top.
β-actin was detected as a control for each blot. The histogram
corresponding to each photograph represents the ratio of densitometric
analysis of each band to the respective β-actin band. The culture was
treated with 0 or 300 µg/ml AE for 24 hour. After treatment, protein
from OVCAR3 and SW626 cells was extracted and 30 µg proteins were
electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE. The protein was then transferred to
nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted against apoptosis related
antibodies - Bax, Bcl2, Caspase 3, cleaved Caspase 3 or
Caspase 7. The values are means + S.E.M. of 4
independent experiments. *, p<0.05, as compared with control
group.
AE induces autophagy in OVCAR3 and SW626 cells
Recent in vivo and in vitro evidence suggests
that a number of anticancer drugs exert their effects, at least partially,
through their effects on autophagy [22,23]. The studies above
suggested that apopotic pathways were not activated by AE treatment, so we opted
to determine whether autophagy was activated in AE treated OC cells.
Specifically, we treated OVCAR3 and SW626 cells with AE to determine the effects
on expression of autophagic proteins- beclin1 and LC3B-II using
immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting techniques. Immunoreactivity for both
beclin1 and LC3B-II was present in untreated OVCAR3 and SW626 cells (Figure 4 A, B, E, F). The
intensity of immunostaining and number of immunopositive cells, however, were
increased by AE treatment [Figure 4
A–H]. Western blot analysis was consistent with results of
immunostaining, demonstrating that AE treatment increased the expression of
beclin1 and LC3B-II in both OVCAR3 and SW626 cells (Figure 4 I–P). These data suggest that
autophagy is activated in AE treated cells. We also studied expression of the
autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II after quercetin treatment (5 µg/ml for
48 hour) in OVCAR3 cells using immunoblotting. Expression of beclin1 and LC3B-II
was significantly higher in quercetin treated cells than control (Figure 4 Q–T).
Figure 4
AE treatment increases beclin1 and LC3B-II expression in OVCAR3 and
SW626 cells.
Immunostaining of beclin1 and LC3B-II in OVCAR3 and SW626 control cells
and after being treated with 300 µg/ml AE (A, B, E and F). The
histograms show the percentage of beclin1 (C and D) and LC3B-II (G and
H) immunopositive cells as a percentage of total cells. OVCAR3 and SW626
cells were cultured and grown for 2 days in DMEM in the presence of 10%
serum as described under Materials and Methods. After this period, the
cultures were fed with medium containing 10% serum and AE for 24 hours.
Cells were photographed at 400 x magnification. Expression of beclin1 in
total protein of OVCAR3 (I) and SW626 (J) cells and expression of
LC3B-II in total protein of OVCAR3 (M) and SW626 (N) cells after being
treated with AE (300 µg/ml) for 24 hrs. Representative photograph of
western blot for beclin1 and LC3B-II are shown on the top. β-actin was
detected as control for each blot. Mean + S.E.M.
values of densitometric ratio of beclin1 (K and L) and LC3B-II (O and P)
with β-actin are shown on the bottom of each respective gel. Q–T:
Quercetin treatment (5 µg/ml for 48 hour) induces expression of beclin1
(Q, R) and LC3B-II (S, T) in OVCAR3 cells. After treatment, protein from
OVCAR3 and SW626 cells was extracted and 50 µg proteins were
electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE. The protein was then transferred to a
nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted against beclin1 and LC3B-II
antibodies. After immunodetection, beclin1 and LC3B-II positive bands
were measured densitometrically and normalized with β-actin values. The
values are means + S.E.M. of 6 independent
experiments. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group. Bar=50
µm.
AE treatment increases beclin1 and LC3B-II expression in OVCAR3 and
SW626 cells.
Immunostaining of beclin1 and LC3B-II in OVCAR3 and SW626 control cells
and after being treated with 300 µg/ml AE (A, B, E and F). The
histograms show the percentage of beclin1 (C and D) and LC3B-II (G and
H) immunopositive cells as a percentage of total cells. OVCAR3 and SW626
cells were cultured and grown for 2 days in DMEM in the presence of 10%
serum as described under Materials and Methods. After this period, the
cultures were fed with medium containing 10% serum and AE for 24 hours.
Cells were photographed at 400 x magnification. Expression of beclin1 in
total protein of OVCAR3 (I) and SW626 (J) cells and expression of
LC3B-II in total protein of OVCAR3 (M) and SW626 (N) cells after being
treated with AE (300 µg/ml) for 24 hrs. Representative photograph of
western blot for beclin1 and LC3B-II are shown on the top. β-actin was
detected as control for each blot. Mean + S.E.M.
values of densitometric ratio of beclin1 (K and L) and LC3B-II (O and P)
with β-actin are shown on the bottom of each respective gel. Q–T:
Quercetin treatment (5 µg/ml for 48 hour) induces expression of beclin1
(Q, R) and LC3B-II (S, T) in OVCAR3 cells. After treatment, protein from
OVCAR3 and SW626 cells was extracted and 50 µg proteins were
electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE. The protein was then transferred to a
nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted against beclin1 and LC3B-II
antibodies. After immunodetection, beclin1 and LC3B-II positive bands
were measured densitometrically and normalized with β-actin values. The
values are means + S.E.M. of 6 independent
experiments. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group. Bar=50
µm.
AE inhibits angiogenesis-related genes in OVCAR3 cells
In view of the fact that a growing tumor mass must establish a vascular supply,
and recent reports that angiogenesis could be inhibited by herbal remedies that
included AE [8], we wanted to determine
whether AE could inhibit angiogenesis in vitro. Specifically,
we studied the effects of AE treatment on the expression of angiogenic genes in
AE-treated (300 µg/ml) and untreated OVCAR3 cells using the Human Angiogenic
OligoGE Array which detects 112 genes specifically involved in angiogenesis (SA
Bioscience Corporation). The experiments were performed in three independent
studies and the results are shown in Figure 5 A–D. Many genes (green *)
were expressed at reduced levels in the AE-treated cells as compared to
untreated controls (Figure
5B). A clustergram depicting the results obtained in control and
AE-treated cultures is shown in Figure 5C. The expression of COL4A3, CXCL6, ECGF1, EFNB2, FGF2,
IL1β, PDGFB, TNFRSF12A and HIF-1α were reduced to less than 40% of control
levels (Figure 5D), with
Hif-1α being inhibited to the greatest extent.
Figure 5
AE treatment reduces expression of angiogenesis related genes in
OVCAR3 cells.
A. The representative photographs of micro array from control and
AE-treated culture. The culture was treated with 0 or 300 µg/ml AE for
24 h. After treatment, RNA was isolated using trizol extraction method.
The superarray membranes were hybridized with biotin labeled cDNA,
incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin, the gene
expression was detected with the chemiluminescent substrate CDP-Star. B.
Representative scatterplot of AE-treated vs control cell cultures. Many
genes (green *) are under expressed in AE-treated group. C.
Left panel: Heat map (clustergram) of control and AE-treated cultures.
Nine genes which are reduced by more than 70% are indicated by
arrowheads on the right side of the heat map. Middle panel: An enlarged
heat map showing reduced expression of Hif-1α in the AE-treated group.
Right panel: The magnitude of gene expression. D. Graphic representation
of the relative gene expression using global background and GAPDH as
reference gene and converted to fold-change values (AE versus
control).
AE treatment reduces expression of angiogenesis related genes in
OVCAR3 cells.
A. The representative photographs of micro array from control and
AE-treated culture. The culture was treated with 0 or 300 µg/ml AE for
24 h. After treatment, RNA was isolated using trizol extraction method.
The superarray membranes were hybridized with biotin labeled cDNA,
incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin, the gene
expression was detected with the chemiluminescent substrate CDP-Star. B.
Representative scatterplot of AE-treated vs control cell cultures. Many
genes (green *) are under expressed in AE-treated group. C.
Left panel: Heat map (clustergram) of control and AE-treated cultures.
Nine genes which are reduced by more than 70% are indicated by
arrowheads on the right side of the heat map. Middle panel: An enlarged
heat map showing reduced expression of Hif-1α in the AE-treated group.
Right panel: The magnitude of gene expression. D. Graphic representation
of the relative gene expression using global background and GAPDH as
reference gene and converted to fold-change values (AE versus
control).
AE inhibits expression of HIF-1α in vitro
In the above experiments, we demonstrated that AE treatment suppressed expression
of numerous genes associated with angiogenesis. In order to determine whether
decreased gene expression corresponded to decreased protein levels, we
specifically examined the effect of AE treatment on production of Hif-1α protein
in OVCAR3 cells using immunocytochemistry and Western blots. Both
immunocytochemistry and Western blot results showed significantly reduced
expression of Hif-1α in OVCAR3 cell cultures (Figure 6 A-B), further supporting the concept
that AE treatment suppresses angiogenesis.
Figure 6
AE treatment reduces the expression of Hif-1α in OVCAR3 cells
in vitro, and with cisplatin synergistically
reduces cell proliferation and induces autophagy in
vitro.
A. Photomicrograph showing reduced expression of Hif-1α immunostatining
in OVCAR3 cells after AE treatment. The histogram shows the percentage
of Hif-1α immunopositive cells compared to total cells. OVCAR3 cells
were cultured and grown and treated with 0 or 300 µg/ml of AE for 24
hours. Cells were immunostained with Hif-1α antibody and photographed at
400X magnification. Bar=50 µm. The values are means
+ S.E.M. of 4 independent experiments. *,
p<0.05, as compared with control group. B. A representative
photograph of Western blot for Hif-1α is shown on the top. β-actin was
detected as a control for each blot. Mean +
S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio of Hif-1α and β-actin are shown on
the bottom of the gel. After immunodetection, the volume of Hif-1α
positive bands was measured densitometrically and normalized with
β-actin values. The values are means + S.E.M. of
4 independent experiments. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group.
C. The histogram shows the synergistic effect of AE in
presence of different doses of cisplatin on cell proliferation in OVCAR3
cells. OVCAR3 cells were cultured and grown for 2 days in DMEM in
presence of 10% serum as described under Materials and Methods. After
this period, the cultures were fed with medium containing 10% serum and
300 µg/ml AE with or without different doses of cisplatin for 24 hours.
Data are the mean + S.E.M. from 6 independent
observations. a, p<0.05, significantly different from vehicle-treated
control group, b, p<0.05, significantly different from cisplatin
group. D and E. The synergistic effect of AE with cisplatin (5 µg/ml) on
autophagy. D. Representative photograph of a Western blot showing
increased expression of beclin1 in AE, cisplatin and AE with cisplatin
treated groups. E. Representative photograph of a Western blot showing
increased expression of LC3B-II in AE, cisplatin and AE with cisplatin
treated groups. OVCAR3 cells were treated with 0, AE (300 µg/ml),
cisplatin (5 µg/ml) and AE (300 µg/ml) with cisplatin (5 µg/ml) for 24
hours. β-actin was used as a control for each blot. Mean
+ S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio of
respective protein (beclin1 and LC3B-II) and β-actin are shown on the
bottom of each gel. a, p<0.05, significantly different from
vehicle-treated control group; b, p<0.05, significantly different
from AE group; c, p<0.05, significantly different from cisplatin
group.
AE treatment reduces the expression of Hif-1α in OVCAR3 cells
in vitro, and with cisplatin synergistically
reduces cell proliferation and induces autophagy in
vitro.
A. Photomicrograph showing reduced expression of Hif-1α immunostatining
in OVCAR3 cells after AE treatment. The histogram shows the percentage
of Hif-1α immunopositive cells compared to total cells. OVCAR3 cells
were cultured and grown and treated with 0 or 300 µg/ml of AE for 24
hours. Cells were immunostained with Hif-1α antibody and photographed at
400X magnification. Bar=50 µm. The values are means
+ S.E.M. of 4 independent experiments. *,
p<0.05, as compared with control group. B. A representative
photograph of Western blot for Hif-1α is shown on the top. β-actin was
detected as a control for each blot. Mean +
S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio of Hif-1α and β-actin are shown on
the bottom of the gel. After immunodetection, the volume of Hif-1α
positive bands was measured densitometrically and normalized with
β-actin values. The values are means + S.E.M. of
4 independent experiments. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group.
C. The histogram shows the synergistic effect of AE in
presence of different doses of cisplatin on cell proliferation in OVCAR3
cells. OVCAR3 cells were cultured and grown for 2 days in DMEM in
presence of 10% serum as described under Materials and Methods. After
this period, the cultures were fed with medium containing 10% serum and
300 µg/ml AE with or without different doses of cisplatin for 24 hours.
Data are the mean + S.E.M. from 6 independent
observations. a, p<0.05, significantly different from vehicle-treated
control group, b, p<0.05, significantly different from cisplatin
group. D and E. The synergistic effect of AE with cisplatin (5 µg/ml) on
autophagy. D. Representative photograph of a Western blot showing
increased expression of beclin1 in AE, cisplatin and AE with cisplatin
treated groups. E. Representative photograph of a Western blot showing
increased expression of LC3B-II in AE, cisplatin and AE with cisplatin
treated groups. OVCAR3 cells were treated with 0, AE (300 µg/ml),
cisplatin (5 µg/ml) and AE (300 µg/ml) with cisplatin (5 µg/ml) for 24
hours. β-actin was used as a control for each blot. Mean
+ S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio of
respective protein (beclin1 and LC3B-II) and β-actin are shown on the
bottom of each gel. a, p<0.05, significantly different from
vehicle-treated control group; b, p<0.05, significantly different
from AE group; c, p<0.05, significantly different from cisplatin
group.
AE with cisplatin synergistically reduced cell proliferation in OVCAR3
cells
In proliferation experiments, we demonstrated that AE reduced OVCAR3 cell
proliferation in a time and dose dependent manner. We next sought to determine
whether AE with cisplatin (a first line chemotherapeutic drug for OC) could
synergistically reduce cell proliferation in OVCAR3 cells. We treated OVCAR3
cells with AE (300 µg/ml) in combination with cisplatin (1-10 µg/ml for 24
hour). We found that AE with cisplatin synergistically reduced cell
proliferation in OVCAR3 cells (Figure 6C).
AE with cisplatin synergistically induced autophagy in OVCAR3 cells
We also studied whether AE and cisplatin could work synergistically to induce
cell death via autophagy. We treated OVCAR3 cells with AE (300 µg/ml) with
cisplatin (5 µg/ml) for 24 hour. We found that AE with cisplatin synergistically
induced expression of the autophagic proteins beclin1 and LC3B-II in OVCAR3 cell
(Figure 6 D-E).
AE inhibits growth and angiogenesis, and induces autophagy in tumors in
athymic (nude) mice
To determine whether AE treatment could reduce tumor growth and induce autophagy
in vivo, OVCAR3 cells were injected into the right flank of
nude mice. Within 6 days of inoculation, tumors grew to form visible masses. At
this time (i.e. 6 days after inoculation) animals were divided into a
non-treated control group, and a treated group (N=5 mice/group). The non-treated
control group was fed 10% sucrose solution, whereas the treated group received
AE (100 mg/kg body weight/day in 10% sucrose) for 18 days. Figure 7A shows that tumors grew more slowly
in AE treated vs. control mice, with significant differences in size at 18 days
of treatment and 24 days after inoculation (p=0.005). Mice were sacrificed 24
days after inoculation and the tumors were excised and weighed. Tumor mass was
significantly reduced in AE treated vs. control mice (Figure 7A). To determine whether AE treatment
could reduce cell proliferation in xenograft tumors similar to cells in culture,
we detected Ki67 (a cellular marker for proliferation [24]) in control and AE treated xenograft tumor sections. AE
treatment significantly reduced (p=0.006) the number of Ki67 positive cells
(Figure 7B). These
results suggest that AE treatment reduced cell proliferation in xenograft
tumors. There also appeared to be no obvious toxicities associated with AE
treatment as demonstrated by no apparent changes in liver, spleen (gross
morphology), body weight or behavior (food and water intake, movement) of AE
treated animals vs. controls (data not shown). These data indicate that AE is a
potentially effective therapeutic agent for treating OC with no obvious toxicity
in mice.
Figure 7
AE treatment inhibits growth of xenografted tumors in
vivo.
A. Top: Nude mice bearing tumors, left – control, right – treated. Bottom
left. Size of tumors. Bottom right. Wet weight of tumor at 24 days of
injection. B. Decreased immunohistochemical expression of Ki67 positive
cells in mouse tumor xenograft after AE treatment. Histogram showing the
decreased percentage of Ki67 immunopositive cells in AE-treated tumors.
The tissue sections were photographed at 400X magnification. Bar=50 µm.
The values are means + S.E.M. of 5 different
mice. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group.
AE treatment inhibits growth of xenografted tumors in
vivo.
A. Top: Nude mice bearing tumors, left – control, right – treated. Bottom
left. Size of tumors. Bottom right. Wet weight of tumor at 24 days of
injection. B. Decreased immunohistochemical expression of Ki67 positive
cells in mousetumor xenograft after AE treatment. Histogram showing the
decreased percentage of Ki67 immunopositive cells in AE-treated tumors.
The tissue sections were photographed at 400X magnification. Bar=50 µm.
The values are means + S.E.M. of 5 different
mice. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group.In the experiments described above, we demonstrated that AE treatment of OC cell
lines increased expression of beclin1 and LC3B-II proteins, indicating that
autophagy was activated by AE treatment in these cell lines. To determine
whether comparable effects would occur in vivo, xenografts from
AE treated mice and controls were examined for the presence of these autophagy
associated proteins. First we stained histologic sections of xenograft tumors
with antibody to beclin1 and demonstrated that beclin1 expression was markedly
enhanced in xenografts from AE treated mice compared to controls (Figure 8A). Next, we extracted
proteins from xenograft tumors and demonstrated, by Western blot analysis, that
expression of both beclin1 and LC3B-II was increased in xenograft tumors from AE
treated mice compared to controls (Figure 8 B-C). These in vivo results demonstrate AE
treatment activates autophagy in xenograft ovarian tumors, which is entirely
consistent with our in vitro findings.
Figure 8
AE treatment induces autophagy, and inhibits angiogenesis and Hif-1α
expression in xenografted tumors.
A. Photograph showing increased immunoexpression of beclin1 in
xenografted tumors after being treated with AE. The histogram shows the
percentage of beclin1 immunopositive cells compared to total cells in
control and AE treated groups. B. Representative photograph of a Western
blot showing increased expression of beclin1 in AE treated group. C.
Representative photograph of a Western blot showing increased expression
of LC3B-II in AE treated group. β-actin was used as a control for each
blot. Mean + S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio
of respective protein (beclin1 and LC3B-II) and β-actin are shown on the
bottom of each gel. D. AE treatment decreased immunohistochemical
expression of CD31 positive cells in mouse xenograft tumors. Histogram
showing decreased microvessel density in xenografts of AE-treated mice.
E. Photomicrograph showing reduced expression of HIF-1α immunostaining
in xenograft tumors after AE treatment. The histogram shows the
percentage of Hif-1α immunopositive cells compared to total cells. F.
Representative photograph of a Western blot for Hif-1α is shown on the
top. β-actin was used as a control for each blot. Mean
+ S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio of
Hif-1α and β-actin are shown on the bottom of the gel. After
immunodetection, the density of Hif-1α positive bands was measured and
normalized with β-actin values. Tissue sections were photographed at
400X magnification. The values are means + S.E.M.
of 5 different mice. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group.
Bar=50 µm.
AE treatment induces autophagy, and inhibits angiogenesis and Hif-1α
expression in xenografted tumors.
A. Photograph showing increased immunoexpression of beclin1 in
xenografted tumors after being treated with AE. The histogram shows the
percentage of beclin1 immunopositive cells compared to total cells in
control and AE treated groups. B. Representative photograph of a Western
blot showing increased expression of beclin1 in AE treated group. C.
Representative photograph of a Western blot showing increased expression
of LC3B-II in AE treated group. β-actin was used as a control for each
blot. Mean + S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio
of respective protein (beclin1 and LC3B-II) and β-actin are shown on the
bottom of each gel. D. AE treatment decreased immunohistochemical
expression of CD31 positive cells in mousexenograft tumors. Histogram
showing decreased microvessel density in xenografts of AE-treated mice.
E. Photomicrograph showing reduced expression of HIF-1α immunostaining
in xenograft tumors after AE treatment. The histogram shows the
percentage of Hif-1α immunopositive cells compared to total cells. F.
Representative photograph of a Western blot for Hif-1α is shown on the
top. β-actin was used as a control for each blot. Mean
+ S.E.M. values of densitometric ratio of
Hif-1α and β-actin are shown on the bottom of the gel. After
immunodetection, the density of Hif-1α positive bands was measured and
normalized with β-actin values. Tissue sections were photographed at
400X magnification. The values are means + S.E.M.
of 5 different mice. *, p<0.05, as compared with control group.
Bar=50 µm.In the experiments presented above, we demonstrated that AE treatment suppresses
expression of a variety of genes associated with angiogenesis in
vitro, and suppresses production of Hif-1α protein in OVCAR3 cells.
Consequently, it was important to determine whether AE treatment had a similar
effect on angiogenesis in vivo. First, we determined the effect
of AE treatment on tumor vasularization by staining with CD31, which is used
primarily to demonstrate the presence of endothelial cells in histological
tissue sections. As demonstrated in Figure 8D, CD31 staining was reduced in xenograft tumors from AE
treated mice as compared to controls. We also calculated microvessel density
within the xenografts and found that it was significantly reduced (p=0.008) in
xenografts from AE treated mice (Figure 8D). Finally, we utilized immunohistochemistry and Western
blot analysis to examine xenografts from AE treated mice and control mice for
the expression of the angiogenesis associated protein Hif-1α, and demonstrated
that AE treatment reduces expression of Hif-1α (Figure 8 E-F). These collective results
support the conclusion that AE treatment suppresses angiogenesis both in
vitro and in OC xenografts.
Discussion
The major findings of the current study are that treatment with AE inhibited
proliferation of OC cell lines in vitro, and dramatically
suppressed growth of OC xenografts in nude mice. The concentrations of AE used to
inhibit growth of OC cell lines in vitro were not toxic for normal
placental cells, and the doses of AE that were used to suppress growth of OC
xenografts in vivo, did not have any obvious toxic effects.
Examination of OC cell lines treated with AE failed to demonstrate DNA
fragmentation, and Western Blot analysis failed to demonstrate an increase in
proteins associated with apoptosis. Consequently, it does not appear that AE
treatment triggered apoptotic pathways in OC cell lines. Examination of AE treated
OC cell lines and OC xenografts, however, demonstrated increased expression of
autophagy associated proteins. Thus, AE treatment was shown to up-regulate autophagy
pathways in OC cells, both in vitro and in vivo.
Several lines of evidence convincingly demonstrated that AE treatment inhibited
angiogenesis in OC cell lines in vitro and in OC xenografts in
vivo. AE treatment was shown to suppress expression of a number of genes associated
with angiogenesis, and inhibited production of the angiogenesis associated protein,
HIF-1α, in OVCAR3 cells in vitro. In OC xenografts, AE treatment
was shown to significantly reduce expression of Hif-1α and the endothelial specific
antigen CD31. Finally, microvessel density within xenografts was significantly
reduced in AE treated mice. These collective results demonstrate that AE is a
potentially effective therapeutic agent for treating OC that may inhibit tumor
growth by activating authophagy and inhibiting angiogenesis.AE has previously been shown to induce apoptosis in human osteoclasts [25]. Additionally, AE contains the bioactive
compound - gallic acid which causes cell death via apoptotic pathway [26]. Thus, we initially hypothesized that the
cells in our study were undergoing apoptosis with cytotoxic treatment of AE.
However, we could not detect any DNA fragmentation (apoptosis) in the cells treated
with the highest concentrations of AE, even after 96 h, although degradation of DNA
was observed on agarose gels (Figure
3A, B). We further studied the expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic
proteins after AE treatment in OC cells. Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein induced
by a variety of physiologic and pathologic stimuli [27,28]. Bax is a pro-apoptotic
protein and also counters anti-apoptotic effects of Bcl-2 [27,28]. It has been
proposed that the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 may govern the sensitivity of cells to
apoptotic stimuli [29,30]. In this study, the expression of both Bax and Bcl2 was
reduced by AE treatment, suggesting that AE treatment did not trigger apoptotic
pathways in OC cells. Furthermore, Western blot data did not indicate altered
caspase 3 expression. Caspase activation (cleavage of procaspase to active caspase)
is unique and sensitive indicator of apoptosis [31]. Reduced cleaved caspase 3 expression after AE treatment confirmed
that apoptotic pathways were not initiated by this treatment.From our studies of apoptosis described above, we noted that AE treatment suppressed
Bcl-2 levels in OC cells. Bcl-2 has been shown to inhibit beclin1 dependent
autophagy [32], so we explored the
possibility that AE treatment stimulated autophagy in OC cells. From our
morphological studies, we noted multiple cytoplasmic vacuoles in AE treated OVCAR3
and SW626 cells and these morphologic changes are consistent with activation of the
autophagic pathway since autophagy is characterized by accumulation of autophagic
vacuoles in the cytoplasm [33-35]. Examination of AE treated OVCAR3 and SW626
cell lines and OC xenografts, demonstrated increased expression of the autophagy
associated proteins, beclin1 and LC3B-II, by both immunostaining and Western Blot
analysis, confirming that AE treatment activates autophagy in OC cells, both
in vitro and in vivo.Beclin1 is an autophagy related gene with disrupted expression in most humancancers
[36]. Beclin1 is reported to be deleted
in 40–75% of cases of human breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers [37]. Additionally, disruption of beclin1
function in mice results in decreased autophagy in lymphomas, lung carcinomas and
mammary precancerous lesions [38].
Conversely, the induction of autophagy is a common property of many antineoplastic
therapies suggesting autophagy is an important regulator of cancer cell death [39]. Consequently, the capacity of AE treatment
to activate autophagy in OC cells may represent one critical mechanism by which it
inhibits growth of OC cell lines in vitro and OC xenografts
in vivo.Angiogenesis is known to play a critical role in the growth and spread of cancer
[40]. Multiple studies have shown that
angiogenic factors secreted by tumor cells play a critical role in tumor
angiogenesis [41-43]. Recent studies have shown that Triphala, an herbal remedy
containing AE, reduced angiogenesis [8].
Consequently, we wanted to determine whether AE treatment inhibited angiogenesis. We
demonstrated that AE treatment suppressed expression of a number of genes associated
with angiogenesis in OVCAR3 cells using the Human Angiogenic OligoGE Array which
detects 112 genes specifically involved in angiogenesis. We found multiple
angiogenic factors are down regulated by AE treatment in OC cells. These include
COL4A3, CXCL6, ECGF1, EFNB2, IL8, PDGFB, TNFRSF12A, FGF2 and Hif-1α [44-52].
Among these factors, Hif-1α is highly affected by AE treatment. Its expression is
reduces by ~90% after treatment. Interestingly, multiple studies found Hif-1α is a
key regulator of angiogenic factors including CXCL6, ECGF1, EFNB2, IL8, PDGFB,
TNFRSF12A, FGF2 [50,51,53-58].AE treatment also inhibited production of the angiogenesis associated protein,
HIF-1α, in OVCAR3 cells in vitro as demonstrated by
immunohistochemical staining and Western Blot analysis. In OC xenografts, AE
treatment was shown to significantly reduce expression of the endothelial specific
antigen CD31 by immunohistochemistry, and the angiogenesis associated protein Hif-1α
by both immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. Finally, microvessel density
within xenografts was significantly reduced in AE treated mice. These collective
studies convincingly demonstrate that AE treatment suppresses angiogenesis in our
in vitro and in vivo models of OC and
antiangiogenic effect of AE may be mediated through the regulation of HIF-1αIn conclusion, this study indicates for the first time that AE is a naturally
occurring plant extract that inhibits growth of OC cells in vitro
and in vivo, perhaps through the activation of autophagy and
inhibition of angiogenesis. AE could become a highly effective therapeutic agent for
the treatment of OC in the future used either alone or in conjunction with currently
used chemotherapeutic agents.
Authors: Meri M Vihanto; Jan Plock; Dominique Erni; Brigitte M Frey; Felix J Frey; Uyen Huynh-Do Journal: FASEB J Date: 2005-08-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Namali T Fernando; Moritz Koch; Courtney Rothrock; Lila K Gollogly; Patricia A D'Amore; Sandra Ryeom; Sam S Yoon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531