| Literature DB >> 24133347 |
Hongxin Yang1, Chaoyong Shen, Bo Zhang, Haining Chen, Zhixin Chen, Jiaping Chen.
Abstract
This study investigated the expression and clinicopathological significance of CD9 in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Immunohistochemistry staining for CD9 was performed on tumor tissues from 74 GIST patients. The correlation with clinicopathological features, risk classification and prognosis was analyzed. CD9-positive staining comprised 59.5% (44/74) of the GIST patients. The CD9-positive expression rate of the sample was significantly associated with diameter (P = 0.028), mitotic counts (P = 0.035), risk classification (P = 0.018) and three-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression (HR = 0.352; P = 0.015) showed that CD9 is an independent factor for post-operative RFS. The subgroup analysis showed that CD9 expression in gastric stromal tumor (GST) is significantly associated with diameter (P = 0.031), risk classification (P = 0.023) and three-year RFS (P = 0.001). The Cox proportional hazards regression (HR = 0.104; P = 0.006) also showed that CD9 is an independent factor for RFS of GST. However, CD9 expression does not have a statistically significant correlation with clinicopathological features, risk classification, and prognosis in non-GST. In conclusion, CD9 expression in GIST appears to be associated with the recurrence and/or metastasis of GIST patients, especially in GST, which may indicate the important role of CD9 in the malignant biological behavior and prognosis of GST.Entities:
Keywords: CD9; Gastric Stromal Tumor; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24133347 PMCID: PMC3792597 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.10.1443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Fig. 1CD9 immunohistochemistry in GIST. (A) CD9-positive expression in low-risk GIST (×400), (B) CD9-negative expression in high-risk GIST (×400).
CD9 expression and clinicopathological features of GIST
*Tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm group compared with > 5 cm group (6 to 10 cm group and > 10 cm group); †mitotic counts ≤ 10/50 HPF group (≤ 5 and 6 to 10/50 HPF group) compared with > 10/50 HPF group; ‡low-/intermediate-risk group compared with high-risk group. EGIST, Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HPF, high power field.
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier estimates of RFS between CD9-positive GIST and CD9-negative GIST group. The hazard ratio for RFS in the CD9-positive group was 0.352 (95% CI, 0.153 to 0.813; P = 0.015) compared with the CD9-negative group. RFS curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between the curves were tested for statistical significance using Log-rank statistics.
CD9 expression and clinicopathological features of GST
*Tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm group compared with > 5 cm group (6 to 10 cm group and > 10 cm group). HPF, high power field.
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier estimates of RFS between CD9-positive GST and CD9-negative GST group. The hazard ratio for RFS in the CD9-positive group was 0.104 (95% CI, 0.021 to 0.528; P = 0.006) compared with the CD9-negative group. RFS curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between the curves were tested for statistical significance using Log-rank statistics.