Literature DB >> 24133037

Dyslexia and early intervention: what did we learn from the Dutch Dyslexia Programme?

Aryan van der Leij1.   

Abstract

Part of the Dutch Dyslexia Programme has been dedicated to early intervention. The question of whether the genetically affected learning mechanism of children who are at familial risk (FR) of developing dyslexia could be influenced by training phoneme awareness and letter-sound associations in the prereading phase was investigated. The rationale was that intervention studies reveal insights about the weaknesses of the learning mechanisms of FR children. In addition, the studies aimed to gather practical insights to be used in the development of a system of early diagnosis and prevention. Focused on the last period of kindergarten before formal reading instruction starts in Grade 1, intervention methods with comparable samples and designs but differences in delivery mode (use of computer or manual), tutor (semi-professional or parent), location (at school or at home), and additional practices (serial rapid naming or simple word reading) have been executed to test the hypothesis that the incidence and degree of dyslexia can be reduced. The present position paper summarizes the Dutch Dyslexia Programme findings and relates them to findings of other studies. It is discussed that the Dutch studies provide evidence on why prevention of dyslexia is hard to accomplish. It is argued that effective intervention should not only start early but also be adapted to the individual and often long-lasting educational needs of children at risk of reading failure.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dyslexia; early identification; early intervention; familial risk; reading failure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24133037     DOI: 10.1002/dys.1466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dyslexia        ISSN: 1076-9242


  5 in total

Review 1.  Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  Margaret J Snowling; Monica Melby-Lervåg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Saccade adaptation deficits in developmental dyslexia suggest disruption of cerebellar-dependent learning.

Authors:  Edward G Freedman; Sophie Molholm; Michael J Gray; Daniel Belyusar; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Differential diagnosis of vergence and saccade disorders in dyslexia.

Authors:  Lindsey M Ward; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The regulatory element READ1 epistatically influences reading and language, with both deleterious and protective alleles.

Authors:  Natalie R Powers; John D Eicher; Laura L Miller; Yong Kong; Shelley D Smith; Bruce F Pennington; Erik G Willcutt; Richard K Olson; Susan M Ring; Jeffrey R Gruen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Bias in dyslexia screening in a Dutch multicultural population.

Authors:  Anick Verpalen; Fons Van de Vijver; Ad Backus
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2018-02-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.