Literature DB >> 24132801

Acute cholecystitis: the golden 72-h period is not a strict limit to perform early cholecystectomy. Results from 316 consecutive patients.

Luca Degrate1, Arianna Libera Ciravegna, Margherita Luperto, Marcello Guaglio, Mattia Garancini, Matteo Maternini, Laura Giordano, Fabrizio Romano, Luca Gianotti, Franco Uggeri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) is the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis (AC), but the optimal surgical timing is controversial. The aim of this study was to retrospectively verify the outcome of patients with AC according to different timing of cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Patients undergoing cholecystectomy for AC from 2006 to 2012 were stratified into two groups: initial admission cholecystectomy (IAC) and delayed cholecystectomy (DC, after at least 4 weeks). Among IAC, a subgroup undergoing immediate cholecystectomy (IC, within 72 h of symptom onset) was further analyzed.
RESULTS: Three-hundred and sixteen consecutive patients were studied. IAC group included 262 patients (82.9 %) and DC group included 54 patients (17.1 %). The two groups were similar in conversion rate, operation length, and overall complication rate. The total length of hospitalization was longer in DC patients (p = 0.005). Among DC patients, 25.9 % required re-hospitalization while waiting an elective procedure. In the group undergoing IC (66 patients), conversion rate, length of operation, and postoperative morbidity were similar to that of the IAC group. Length of stay was shorter in IC group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified moderate-severe AC grading and ASA score ≥ 3 as predictors of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The timing of cholecystectomy for AC does not seem to affect conversion rate and postoperative morbidity. Therefore the 72-h period should not be considered a strict limit to perform LC, provided that the operation is carried out during the initial hospital admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24132801     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1131-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  30 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis.

Authors:  Alfonso S Serralta; Jose L Bueno; Manuel R Planells; David R Rodero
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S B Kolla; S Aggarwal; A Kumar; R Kumar; S Chumber; R Parshad; V Seenu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Tamim Siddiqui; Alisdair MacDonald; Peter S Chong; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Gurusamy; K Samraj; C Gluud; E Wilson; B R Davidson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  [Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy effective and reliable in acute cholecystitis? Results of a prospective study of 221 pathologically documented cases].

Authors:  P Colonval; B Navez; E Cambier; C Richir; B de Pierpont; J J Scohy; P Guiot
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1997

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Zhanzhi Zhang; Yan Wang; Ke Gong; Yiping Lu; Nengwei Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.

Authors:  Urs F Giger; Jean-Marie Michel; Isabelle Opitz; Devdas Th Inderbitzin; Thomas Kocher; Lukas Krähenbühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones.

Authors:  I Halldestam; E-L Enell; E Kullman; K Borch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Amy M Cao; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Yunxiao Cheng; Bin Wang; Sicong Zhao; Liang Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Rahul S Koti; Christopher J Davidson; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Improving the outcome of acute cholecystitis: the non-standardized treatment must no longer be employed.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio González-Muñoz; María Angoso; José María Sayagués; Ana Belén Sánchez-Casado; Alvaro Hernández; Antonio Velasco; Luís Muñoz-Bellvis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Early Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Severe Acute Cholecystitis Reduces the Complication Rate and Duration of Hospital Stay.

Authors:  Chung-Kai Chou; Kuei-Chuan Lee; Che-Chang Chan; Chin-Lin Perng; Chun-Ku Chen; Wen-Liang Fang; Han-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called "golden 72 hours"? Or better "golden 24 hours" and "silver 25-72 hour"? A case control study.

Authors:  Peter Ambe; Sebastian A Weber; Hildegard Christ; Dirk Wassenberg
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis are at increased risk for extensive gallbladder inflammation.

Authors:  Marios Papadakis; Peter C Ambe; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.