Literature DB >> 24132503

Wintering birds avoid warm sunshine: predation and the costs of foraging in sunlight.

Jennie M Carr1, Steven L Lima.   

Abstract

Wintering birds can gain significant thermal benefits by foraging in direct sunlight. However, exposure to bright sunlight might make birds easier to detect by predators and may also cause visual glare that can reduce a bird's ability to monitor the environment. Thus, birds likely experience a trade-off between the thermal benefits and predation-related costs of foraging in direct sunlight. To examine this possible thermoregulation-predation trade-off, we monitored the behavior of mixed-species flocks of wintering emberizid sparrows foraging in alternating strips of sunlight and shade. On average, these sparrows routinely preferred to forage in the shade, despite midday air temperatures as much as 30 °C below their thermoneutral zone. This preference for shade was strongest at relatively high temperatures when the thermal benefits of foraging in sunlight were reduced, suggesting a thermoregulation-predation trade-off. Glare could be reduced if birds faced away from the sun while feeding in direct sunlight, but we found that foraging birds tended to face southward (the direction of the sun). We speculate that other factors, such as the likely direction of predator approach, may explain this southerly orientation, particularly if predators use solar glare to their advantage during an attack. This interpretation is supported by the fact that birds had the weakest southerly orientation on cloudy days. Wintering birds may generally avoid foraging in direct sunlight to minimize their risk of predation. However, given the thermal benefits of sunshine, such birds may benefit from foraging in habitats that provide a mosaic of sunlit and shaded microhabitats.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24132503     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2804-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Sun shades and eye size in birds.

Authors:  G R Martin; G Katzir
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  The value of fat reserves and the tradeoff between starvation and predation.

Authors:  J M McNamara; A I Houston
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.774

3.  Visual perception and social foraging in birds.

Authors:  Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jonathan T Erichsen; Alex Kacelnik
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Orientation to solar radiation in black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou).

Authors:  Shane K Maloney; Graeme Moss; Duncan Mitchell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Behavioral thermoregulation: orientation toward the sun in herring gulls.

Authors:  S Luskick; B Battersby; M Kelty
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Roadrunners: energy conservation by hypothermia and absorption of sunlight.

Authors:  R D Ohmart; R C Lasiewski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Effects of complex radiative and convective environments on the thermal biology of the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii).

Authors:  B O Wolf; K M Wooden; G E Walsberg
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Curved flight paths and sideways vision in peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus).

Authors:  V A Tucker; A E Tucker; K Akers; J H Enderson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Do metabolic responses to solar radiation scale directly with intensity of irradiance?

Authors:  G E Walsberg; R L Tracy; T C Hoffman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Use of the sun as a heading indicator when caching and recovering in a wild rodent.

Authors:  Jamie Samson; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  High intra-specific variation in avian body condition responses to climate limits generalisation across species.

Authors:  Nina McLean; Henk P van der Jeugd; Martijn van de Pol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Response time of an avian prey to a simulated hawk attack is slower in darker conditions, but is independent of hawk colour morph.

Authors:  Carina Nebel; Petra Sumasgutner; Adrien Pajot; Arjun Amar
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Influence of the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program wetland practices on winter occupancy of Passerellidae sparrows and avian species richness.

Authors:  Katharine E Lewis; Christopher T Rota; Christopher M Lituma; James T Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Shade affects magnitude and tactics of juvenile Chinook salmon antipredator behavior in the migration corridor.

Authors:  Megan C Sabal; Michelle L Workman; Joseph E Merz; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.