Literature DB >> 24132469

A multicenter prospective cohort study on camera navigation training for key user groups in minimally invasive surgery.

Maurits Graafland1, Kiki Bok2, Henk W R Schreuder2, Marlies P Schijven3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Untrained laparoscopic camera assistants in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) may cause suboptimal view of the operating field, thereby increasing risk for errors. Camera navigation is often performed by the least experienced member of the operating team, such as inexperienced surgical residents, operating room nurses, and medical students. The operating room nurses and medical students are currently not included as key user groups in structured laparoscopic training programs. A new virtual reality laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) module was specifically developed for these key user groups.
METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study assesses face validity and construct validity of the LCN module on the Simendo virtual reality simulator. Face validity was assessed through a questionnaire on resemblance to reality and perceived usability of the instrument among experts and trainees. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores of groups with different levels of experience on outcome parameters of speed and movement proficiency.
RESULTS: The results obtained show uniform and positive evaluation of the LCN module among expert users and trainees, signifying face validity. Experts and intermediate experience groups performed significantly better in task time and camera stability during three repetitions, compared to the less experienced user groups (P < .007). Comparison of learning curves showed significant improvement of proficiency in time and camera stability for all groups during three repetitions (P < .007).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study show face validity and construct validity of the LCN module. The module is suitable for use in training curricula for operating room nurses and novice surgical trainees, aimed at improving team performance in minimally invasive surgery.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Keywords:  ergonomics; evidence-based medicine/surgery; human factors study; simulation; surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24132469     DOI: 10.1177/1553350613505714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  4 in total

1.  Structured assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation skills: the SALAS score.

Authors:  T Huber; M Paschold; F Schneble; A Poplawski; F Huettl; F Watzka; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Image-based laparoscopic camera steering versus conventional steering: a comparison study.

Authors:  Paul J M Wijsman; Lennert Molenaar; Frank J Voskens; Cas D P Van't Hullenaar; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 3.  How, for Whom, and in Which Contexts or Conditions Augmented and Virtual Reality Training Works in Upskilling Health Care Workers: Realist Synthesis.

Authors:  Norina Gasteiger; Sabine N van der Veer; Paul Wilson; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.143

4.  Viewpoint matters: objective performance metrics for surgeon endoscope control during robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Myriam J Curet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.