| Literature DB >> 24131872 |
Abstract
An objective of this study is to search how physical examination and diet consultation can influence those risk factors of cardiovascular disease. The subjects were 326 pilots of the "B" airline company in Korea whose total cholesterol values were over 220 mg/dl on their regular physical examinations from April 2006 to December 2008. They were divided into two groups, one who had diet consultation (an intervention group) and a control group. The physical examination components used to each group were body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglyceride (TG). The behavioral, anthropometric and biomedical measurements were collected at each visit. This study compares and investigates the changes of serum cholesterol and also the health-behavior at each physical examination. Within the intervention group significant improvements were observed for total cholesterol, BMI (body mass index) and HDL (high density lipoprotein). The normalizing rates for cholesterol level to decrease down to lower than 200 mg/dl were 17.7% in intervention group and 8.7% in control group, which is statistically significantly higher among the intervention group. The odds ratio of diet consultation was 2.80 (95% CI=1.35-5.79), which indicates that it is a significantly contributing factor to normalize the serum cholesterol value down to lower than 200 mg/dl. Based on result, it is recommended to have regular physical examination and intensive management with diet and exercise consultation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24131872 PMCID: PMC4202750 DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2012-0027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ind Health ISSN: 0019-8366 Impact factor: 2.179
Fig. 1.Flow chart of this study procedure. *TC : Total cholesterol, HDL : High-Density Lipoprotein, LDL : Low-Density Lipoprotein, TG : Triglyceride, BMI : Body Mass Index.
General characteristics of subjects
| Intervention group (n=130) | Control group (n=196) | Total (n=326) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 30–39 | n=61 (46.9%) | n=51 (26.0%) | n=112 (34.4%) | <0.001 |
| 40–49 | n=43 (33.1%) | n=81 (41.3%) | n=124 (38.0%) | ||
| 50–59 | n=26 (20.0%) | n=64 (32.7%) | n=90 (27.6%) | ||
| Position | Captain | n=65 (50.0%) | n=105 (53.6%) | n=170 (52.1%) | 0.075 |
| F/O | n=63 (48.5%) | n=78 (39.8%) | n=141 (43.3%) | ||
| FE | n=2 (1.5%) | n=13 (6.6%) | n=15 (4.6%) | ||
| Work period (year) | <10 | n=63 (48.5%) | n=65 (33.2%) | n=128 (39.3%) | 0.042 |
| 10–19 | n=57 (43.8%) | n=112 (57.1%) | n=169 (51.8%) | ||
| >20 | n=10 (7.7%) | n=19 (9.7%) | n=29 (8.9%) | ||
*χ2- test.
Comparison of 1st physical examination result between intervention and control group
| Intervention group (n=130) | Control group (n=196) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mg/dl) | 238.55 ± 13.83** | 234.45 ± 12.22 | 0.007 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 49.71 ± 10.93 | 52.34 ± 11.63 | 0.041 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 159.36 ± 17.36 | 152.54 ± 13.86 | <0.001 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 158.45 ± 97.25 | 150.51 ± 68.63 | 0.388 |
| BMI | 24.8 ± 2.18 | 24.26 ± 2.00 | 0.023 |
| Weight (kg) | 74.56 ± 8.03 | 72.07 ± 7.96 | 0.006 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 118.35 ± 9.75 | 117.71 ± 13.62 | 0.645 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 75.25 ± 7.48 | 75.79 ± 9.18 | 0.574 |
| FBS (mg/dl) | 94.58 ± 8.60 | 93.95 ± 8.91 | 0.526 |
*t-test ; **Mean ± SD.
Results of physical examination of intervention and control group
| 1st result | 2nd result | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | TC (mg/dl) | 238.55 ± 13.83** | 222.20 ± 22.01 | 8.13 | <0.001 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 49.71 ± 10.93 | 48.68 ± 11.15 | 6.65 | <0.001 | |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 1,159.36 ± 17.36 | 145.63 ± 19.03 | 1.8 | 0.074 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 158.45 ± 97.25 | 147.25 ± 83.35 | 1.62 | 0.107 | |
| BMI | 24.80 ± 2.18 | 24.54 ± 2.17 | 3.39 | 0.001 | |
| Control group | TC (mg/dl) | 234.45 ± 12.22** | 222.17 ± 16.99 | 10.96 | <0.001 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 52.34 ± 11.63 | 51.3 ± 11.20 | 9.81 | <0.001 | |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 152.54 ± 13.86 | 142.24 ± 15.94 | 2.48 | 0.014 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 150.51 ± 68.63 | 149.92 ± 70.63 | 0.13 | 0.895 | |
| BMI | 24.26 ± 2.00 | 24.24 ± 2.00 | 0.54 | 0.591 | |
*paired t-test; ** Mean ± SD.
Normalizing rates of TC after counseling
| Intervention group | Control group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Abnormalization | n=107 (82.3%) | n=179 (91.3%) | 0.015 |
| Normalization | n=23 (17.7%) | n=17 (8.7%) | ||
| 220≤TC<240 | Abnormalization | n=60 (80.0%) | n=125 (88.0%) | 0.113 |
| Normalization | n=15 (20.0%) | n=17 (12.0%) | ||
| 240≤TC | Abnormalization | n=47 (85.5%) | n=54 (100.0%) | 0.006 |
| Normalization | n=8 (14.5%) | n=0 (0.0%) | ||
*exact test.
Factors affecting normalization of TC
| β | SE | OR* | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | (23≤BMI<25) | 0.22 | 0.47 | 1.24 | 0.5–3.11 |
| (BMI≥25) | 0.08 | 0.49 | 1.09 | 0.42–2.82 | |
| Smoking | −0.36 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.33–1.46 | |
| Drinking | 0.09 | 0.38 | 1.1 | 0.53–2.29 | |
| Exercise | (<90 min/week) | 0.44 | 0.68 | 1.55 | 0.4–5.92 |
| (>90 min/week) | 0.86 | 0.67 | 2.36 | 0.64–8.76 | |
| Intervention group | 1.03 | 0.37 | 2.80** | 1.35–5.79 | |
*adjusted for age, position and work period. **adjusted for lifestyle factors (smoking, drinking and exercise).
Factors affecting change of TC
| β | SE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | −0.354 | 0.190 | 0.071 |
| Drinking | −0.123 | 0.142 | 0.390 |
| Smoking | −0.213 | 0.139 | 0.135 |
| Exercise | −0.379 | 0.131 | 0.001 |
| BMI | −0.118 | 0.146 | 0.425 |
| Position | 0.488 | 0.190 | 0.003 |
| Counseling | −0.036 | 0.137 | 0.797 |
Adjusted R2=0.215.