Literature DB >> 24131552

Perturbed threat monitoring following a traumatic event predicts risk for post-traumatic stress disorder.

R Naim1, I Wald1, A Lior2, D S Pine3, N A Fox4, G Sheppes1, P Halpern2, Y Bar-Haim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic and difficult to treat psychiatric disorder. Objective, performance-based diagnostic markers that uniquely index risk for PTSD above and beyond subjective self-report markers could inform attempts to improve prevention and early intervention. We evaluated the predictive value of threat-related attention bias measured immediately after a potentially traumatic event, as a risk marker for PTSD at a 3-month follow-up. We measured the predictive contribution of attentional threat bias above and beyond that of the more established marker of risk for PTSD, self-reported psychological dissociation.
METHOD: Dissociation symptoms and threat-related attention bias were measured in 577 motor vehicle accident (MVA) survivors (mean age = 35.02 years, 356 males) within 24 h of admission to an emergency department (ED) of a large urban hospital. PTSD symptoms were assessed at a 3-month follow-up using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS).
RESULTS: Self-reported dissociation symptoms significantly accounted for 16% of the variance in PTSD at follow-up, and attention bias toward threat significantly accounted for an additional 4% of the variance in PTSD.
CONCLUSIONS: Threat-related attention bias can be reliably measured in the context of a hospital ED and significantly predicts risk for later PTSD. Possible mechanisms underlying the association between threat bias following a potentially traumatic event and risk for PTSD are discussed. The potential application of an attention bias modification treatment (ABMT) tailored to reduce risk for PTSD is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24131552     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291713002456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  7 in total

1.  Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.

Authors:  Rebecca B Price; Vanessa Brown; Greg J Siegle
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Threat-Related Attention Bias Variability and Posttraumatic Stress.

Authors:  Reut Naim; Rany Abend; Ilan Wald; Sharon Eldar; Ofir Levi; Eyal Fruchter; Karen Ginat; Pinchas Halpern; Maurice L Sipos; Amy B Adler; Paul D Bliese; Phillip J Quartana; Daniel S Pine; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 3.  Less is more: Patient-level meta-analysis reveals paradoxical dose-response effects of a computer-based social anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias.

Authors:  Rebecca B Price; Jennie M Kuckertz; Nader Amir; Yair Bar-Haim; Per Carlbring; Meredith L Wallace
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 6.505

4.  Associations Among Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, Substance Use, and Affective Attentional Processing in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans.

Authors:  Gabrielle I Liverant; Melissa M Amick; Shimrit K Black; Michael Esterman; Blair E Wisco; Molly C Gibian; Brian P Marx; Regina E McGlinchey
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.899

5.  Validity of Attention Bias Variability Indices for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research: Evidence From Patient Data.

Authors:  Yaron Alon; Reut Naim; Daniel S Pine; Paul D Bliese; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2019-08-28

6.  Accessible Neurobehavioral Anger-Related Markers for Vulnerability to Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in a Population of Male Soldiers.

Authors:  Tamar Lin; Gadi Gilam; Gal Raz; Ayelet Or-Borichev; Yair Bar-Haim; Eyal Fruchter; Talma Hendler
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Infant attachment predicts bodily freezing in adolescence: evidence from a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Hannah C M Niermann; Verena Ly; Sanny Smeekens; Bernd Figner; J Marianne Riksen-Walraven; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.