Literature DB >> 24130863

Enhancement of carbon sequestration in soil in the temperature grasslands of northern China by addition of nitrogen and phosphorus.

Nianpeng He1, Qiang Yu, Ruomeng Wang, Yunhai Zhang, Yang Gao, Guirui Yu.   

Abstract

Increased class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) declass="Chemical">position is common worldwide. Questions of where, how, and if reactive N-inclass="Chemical">put influences soil class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbon (C) sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems are of great concern. To explore the potential for soil C sequestration in steppe region under N and phosphorus (P) addition, we conducted a field experiment between 2006 and 2012 in the temperate grasslands of northern China. The experiment examined 6 levels of N (0-56 g N m(-2) yr(-1)), 6 levels of P (0-12.4 g P m(-2) yr(-1)), and a control scenario. Our results showed that addition of both N and P enhanced soil total C storage in grasslands due to significant increases of C input from litter and roots. Compared with control plots, soil organic carbon (SOC) in the 0-100 cm soil layer varied quadratically, from 156.8 to 1352.9 g C m(-2) with N addition gradient (R(2) = 0.99, P < 0.001); and logarithmically, from 293.6 to 788.6 g C m(-2) with P addition gradient (R(2) = 0.56, P = 0.087). Soil inorganic carbon (SIC) decreased quadratically with N addition. The net C sequestration on grassland (including plant, roots, SIC, and SOC) increased linearly from -128.6 to 729.0 g C m(-2) under N addition (R(2) = 0.72, P = 0.023); and increased logarithmically, from 248.5 to 698 g C m(-2)under P addition (R(2) = 0.82, P = 0.014). Our study implies that N addition has complex effects on soil carbon dynamics, and future studies of soil C sequestration on grasslands should include evaluations of both SOC and SIC under various scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24130863      PMCID: PMC3795058          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

class="Species">Human activity has doubled the atmosclass="Chemical">pheric declass="Chemical">position of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) over the past century [1,2]. N deposition can influence the biogeochemical coupling of the carbon (C) and N cycles in soil by altering organic matter decomposition [3-5], belowground C allocation [6,7], and microbial communities and activity [8,9]. However, it remains unclear whether N limits soil C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems, although the promotion of plant growth and ecosystem primary production are observed in many regions [3,6,7]. The effect of N addition on soil C sequestration is a concern because soil C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems is an important approach to offset anthropogenic CO2 emissions [10]. Increases in N deposition have been predicted to increase terrestrial C storage [11,12], but the results of field experiments were inconsistent. Zeng et al. (2010) reported that N addition decreased the C storage of soil and aboveground content in ecosystems to some extent [13]. On the basis of a meta-analysis of 257 studies, Lu et al. (2011) found that N addition had no apparent effect on soil C storage in either the organic horizon or mineral soil in grasslands, despite substantial increases in C inputs from roots and litter [14]. Grasslands in northern China (approximately 150 million ha) have enormous capacity to sequester atmospheric class="Chemical">CO2 through good management of land use, esclass="Chemical">pecially via grazing-exclusion, mowing, and conversion from farmland to grassland [15-18]. Soil acidification or class="Chemical">pH decrease was class="Chemical">predicted in semi-arid regions with increasing N inclass="Chemical">put, which might result in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 emission from dissolution of soil inorganic carbon (SIC: carbonate minerals, such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and dolomite (MgCO3)), and from decomposition of soil organic C(SOC) by altering microbial communities and activity [19-21]. To date, few studies have evaluated the change of SIC and its importance to soil C sequestration within N addition experiments, despite the abundance of SIC in semi-arid regions [22,23]. Inner Mongolian grassland, under semi-arid climate, is an important terrestrial ecosystem in northern China. Increasing N deposition may have a large influence on SOC dynamics and SIC storage, thus on the capacity of C sequestration in the Inner Mongolian grasslands. In this paper, we used a seven-year field experiment, comprising a 6-level N addition gradient and 6-level class="Chemical">P addition gradient to investigate the effects of N and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P addition on soil C sequestration in Inner Mongolian grasslands. The main objectives were to: (1) explore the effect of N and P on soil C sequestration; and (2) quantify the role of SIC in soil C sequestration for under scenarios of increased N deposition.

Materials and Methods

Study site

This study was conducted in a typical steppe ecosystem at the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (IMGERS) of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The region had a semi-arid continental climate with mean annual precipitation of 345mm and mean annual temperature of 1.1°C over the period 1980 to 2010 [15]. The soil was classified as dark chestnut (calcic chernozem according to ISSS Working Group RB, 1998) or loamy sand in terms of texture. The experimental plot was located at 43°33′01″N, 116°40′20″E at an average elevation of 1200 m above sea level. The plot has been fenced off since 1999 to prevent grazing and trampling by large animals (e.g., class="Species">sheep, class="Chemical">pan class="Species">cattle, and horses) [16].

Experimental design

Detailed information of the experimental design used in this research was reported in previous studies [24,25]. In brief, the field experiments for N (urea) and class="Chemical">P (class="Chemical">potassium class="Chemical">phosclass="Chemical">phate) addition have been conducted in a class="Chemical">pan class="Species">Leymus chinensis grassland since 2006, where the predominant species were L. chinensis, Stipa grandis, Cleistogenes squarrosa, and Agropyron michnoi N addition regimes were designated as control (CK), 0 (N1), 5.6 (N2), 11.2 (N3), 22.4 (N4), 39.2 (N5), or 56(N6) g N m-2 yr-1. Similarly, P addition regimes were designed as control (CK), 0 (P1), 1.55 (P2), 3.1(P3), 6.2 (P4), 9.3 (P5), or 12.4 (P6) g P m-2 yr-1. Other than in the control, 1.55 g P m-2 was also added to each plot in the N addition experiment, and 2.8 g N m-2 was added to each plot in the P addition experiment. Thus, there were seven levels for both N and P application with six replicates, giving a total of 84 experimental plots (6 m × 6 m)(Figure S1 in File S1). The fertilizer was thoroughly mixed with sand and then applied in late May, from 2006 to 2012. Our experimental design provided two unique series, one being a N-addition gradient without P limitation, and the other being a P-addition gradient without N limitation.

Field sampling

At the end of July 2012, we established one sampling quadrat (0.5 m × 1.0 m) in each plot. We first investigated aboveground biomass (AB) with all plant species combined. Litter was subsequently collected. Root biomass was determined using a soil corer (diameter, 7 cm). The samples were collected separately from 5-points within each sampling quadrat, at 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, 30–50 cm, and 50–100 cm in each plot. Similarly, soil samples were collected using a soil auger (4 cm in diameter) at 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, 30–50 cm, and 50–100 cm.Bulk density of each soil layer was measured by the IMGERS, using the core method (volume 100 cm3) with3 replicates.

Chemical analysis

class="Chemical">Plant, litter, root, and soil samclass="Chemical">ples were ground using a ball mill (M400, Retsch, Germany). The concentration of soil total class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbon (STC) was measured by dry combustion using an elemental analyzer (VARIO MAX CN, Elementar, Hanau, Germany). The concentration of SIC was measured by manometric collection of CO2 evolved during an HCl treatment process. SOC was calculated as the difference between STC and SIC. C concentrations in plant, root, and litter were measured using the elemental analyzer. Soil pH was determined via a pH meter using soil mixed with distilled water (ratio 1:2.5).

Calculations and statistical analysis

pan class="Chemical">STC, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">SIC, and SOC (g C m-2) were calculated on an area basis to a soil depth of 100 cm, as described previously [15]: where D, S, B, OM, and TN represent the thickness of the soil layer (cm), cross-sectional area (m2), bulk density (g cm-3), and total C concentration (g kg-1), respectively; i = 1, 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, the differences in class="Chemical">STC and SOC storage between N or class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P treatments and CK plots was calculated, and was used as the capacity of soil C sequestration. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effects of N and class="Chemical">P addition on the C storage in AB, litter, roots, and soil. Regression analyses were used to test the relationshiclass="Chemical">ps between the storage of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">STC, SOC, and SIC and the addition intensities of N or P. Data were represented as mean ±1 standard deviation (n = 6). All analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (ver. 13.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Changes in plant and soil C storage

C stored in AB and litter significantly increased with increasing N addition (F = 3.89, class="Chemical">P = 0.04 for AB; F = 7.33, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P < 0.001 for litter) (Table 1), but no apparent effects were observed for P addition. In comparison with soil and roots, C storage in AB and litter was negligible (<1%). C storage in roots varied from 617.4 to 699.7 g C m-2 in the 0–100-cm soil layer (Table 2), but did not increase significantly with addition of N and P (Table 1). C storage in grasslands (including AB, litter, root, SOC, and SIC in the 0–100-cm soil layer) varied from 16615 to 17448 g C m-2 for the N-addition series, and from 16628 to 17538 g C m-2 for the P-addition series, but no significant differences were observed. However, C storage in grassland increased linearly with the intensity of N input (R2 = 0.82, P = 0.005), and increased quadratically with P addition intensity (R2 = 0.86, P = 0.003) (Figure 1).
Table 1

Changes of C storage in Inner Mongolian grasslands with N and P addition.

C storage (g C m-2)
Aboveground biomassLitterRoots (0–100 cm)SOC (0–100 cm)SIC (0–100 cm)
N addition
CK 40.4±3.6a 31.8±7.6a 620.1±85.5a 11770±1684a 4339±111a
N144.3±8.5ab 31.5±7.4a 635.7 ±65.0a 11926±554a 4355±706a
N246.4±10.2ab 33.9±7.2a 639.8 ±84.6a 12072±674a 4108±202ab
N344.2±7.7ab 49.2±10.6b 658.5 ±82.6a 12254±1093a 3725±460b
N453.0±10.6bc 46.2±6.6bc 673.8 ±35.3a 12620±569a 3876±192ab
N562.6±12.7c 39.8±6.2ac 698.5 ±96.8a 12826±347a 3778±404a
N660.4±16.8c 49.4±3.2b 699.7 ±70.5a 13122±637a 3715±524a
F-value3.89 (0.04)7.33 (<0.001)0.99 (0.444)1.96(0.099)2.67(0.031)
P addition
CK40.7±10.6a 31.7±8.2a 617.4 ±59.5a 11882±808a 4266±591a
P145.2±5.6a 33.7±6.0a 647.6 ±46.4a 12176±675a 4221±675a
P246.9±7.0 a 32.4±5.0a 650.0 ±106.8a 12294±926a 4363±935a
P348.4±11.6a 33.9±2.2a 662.6 ±68.8a 12423±909a 4305±251a
P446.0±10.7a 33.8±7.9a 671.6 ±94.3a 12671±634a 4089±298a
P545.8±9.9a 33.3±7.2a 671.9 ±48.9a 12405±1519a 4303±424a
P646.7±6.5a 35.2±4.9a 679.6 ±102.6a 12497±740a 4350±550a
F-value0.424 (0.858)0.207 (0.972)0.43(0.853)0.38(0.885)0.97(0.463)

† CK, control; N1, 0 g N m-2 yr-1, N2, 5.6 g N m-2 yr-1; N3, 11.2 g N m-2 yr-1; N4, 22.4 g N m-2 yr-1; N5, 39.2 g N m-2 yr-1; N6, 56 g N m-2 yr-1; P1, 0 g P m– 2 yr-1; P2, 1.55 g P m– 2 yr-1; P3, 3.10 g P m– 2 yr-1; P4, 6.20 g P m– 2 yr-1; P5, 9.30 g P m– 2 yr-1; P6, 12.4 g P N m-2 yr-1.

‡ Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6), and those designated with the same letters are not significantly different (P <0.05).

Table 2

C storage in roots within the different soil layers

Carbon storage in roots (g C m-2)
0–10 cm10–30 cm30–50 cm50–100 cm
N addition
CK232.6±81.4ab 202.9±20.6a 103.8±12.5a 80.8±25.8a
N1234.4±45.3ab 228.2±24.7a 98.1±18.7a 75.1±24.8a
N2202.0±25.5ab 231.9±64.5a 105.8±20.9a 100.1±38.2a
N3244.2±54.5ab 217.1±27.4a 118.4±44.4a 78.8±24.4a
N4272.2±23.6ab 214.6±19.3a 104.0±12.0a 83.0±7.8a
N5269.3±43.5a 205.3±31.2a 123.7±22.1a 100.3±29.6a
N6304.3±47.8b 197.5±48.6a 104.8±18.8a 93.2±15.0
P addition
CK234.2±17.6a 173.9±43.8a 113.3±36.0a 95.9±12.6a
P1235.4±34.3a 198.4±30.8a 110.7±13.6a 103.1±12.5a
P2217.0±35.4a 235.0±44.1a 115.4±22.2a 82.6±41.8a
P3258.8±26.7a 218.4±59.4a 103.3±19.5a 82.1±17.4a
P4245.2±45.0a 220.5±70.0a 113.0±21.6a 93.0±10.0a
P5246.5±56.4a 198.4±28.6a 132.6±11.0a 94.4±19.9a
P6267.3±46.9a 191.6±81.5a 136.9±9.1a 83.9±14.3a

Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6), and those designated with the same letters are not significantly different (P <0.05).

Figure 1

Changes in the carbon storage of Inner Mongolian grasslands with N addition (A and C) and P addition (B and D).

Total C storage including C storage of ANPP, litter, roots, SOC, SIC (i.e. top 100-soil layer). Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6). See Table 1 for N and P addition and abbreviations.

CK, control; N1, 0 g N m-2 yr-1, N2, 5.6 g N m-2 yr-1; N3, 11.2 g N m-2 yr-1; N4, 22.4 g N m-2 yr-1; N5, 39.2 g N m-2 yr-1; N6, 56 g N m-2 yr-1; P1, 0 g P m– 2 yr-1; P2, 1.55 g P m– 2 yr-1; P3, 3.10 g P m– 2 yr-1; P4, 6.20 g P m– 2 yr-1; P5, 9.30 g P m– 2 yr-1; P6, 12.4 g P N m-2 yr-1. ‡ Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6), and those designated with the same letters are not significantly different (pan class="Chemical">P <0.05). Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6), and those designated with the same letters are not significantly different (pan class="Chemical">P <0.05).

Changes in the carbon storage of Inner Mongolian grasslands with N addition (A and C) and P addition (B and D).

Total C storage including C storage of ANclass="Chemical">Pclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P, litter, roots, SOC, SIC (i.e. top 100-soil layer). Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6). See Table 1 for N and P addition and abbreviations.

Changes in SOC and SIC

SOC in the 0–100-cm soil layer ranged from 11770 to 13122 g C m-2 with N addition (Table 1, Table 3), and there was a strong, positive linear relationship with the intensity of N input within the 0–30 cm (R2 =0.83, class="Chemical">P = 0.003) and 0–100 cm soil layers (R2 = 0.95, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P <0.001) (Figure 1). Similarly, SOC increased quadratically with the intensity of P input in the 0-30cm (R2 = 0.92, P = 0.001) and 0–100 cm (R2 =0.74, P = 0.012) soil layers (Figure 1).
Table 3

Changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) storage within the different soil layers.

SOC storage (g C m-2)
0–10 cm10–30 cm30–50 cm50–100 cm
N addition
CK2611±101 a 3492±125 a 2370±180 a 3256±344 a
N12594±119 a 3563±235 a 2499±323 a 3270±564 a
N22627±20 ab 3761±212 a 2314±330 a 3370±296 a
N32715±128 b 3705±152 a 2337±305 a 3378±321 a
N42878±65 c 3709±233 a 2647±310 a 3350±46 a
N52852±83 c 3712±233 a 2653±166 a 3347±460 a
N62946±108 c 3997±238 b 2719±278 a 3397±904 a
P addition
CK2579±148 a 3486±463 a 2518±111 a 3300±327 a
P12596±61 a 3487±276 a 2568±343 a 3690±449 a
P22678±220 b 3518±313 a 2524±327 a 3692±334 a
P32833±111 b 3497±387 a 2620±464 a 3473±301 a
P42816±149 b 3631±282 a 2561±277 a 3663±352 a
P52788±80 b 3642±446 a 2452±284 a 3522±519 a
P62833±133 b 3695±528 a 2495±439 a 3475±290 a

Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6), and those designated with the same letters are not significantly different (P <0.05).

In response to N addition, soil pH decreased from 7.0 to 6.0 in the 0–10-cm soil layer and from 7.5 class="Species">to 7.2 in the 10–30-cm soil layer (Table S1 in File S1). class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">SIC in the 0–30-cm soil layer differed significantly between N treatments (F = 3.92, P <0.05), but there were no significant differences in the 0–100 cm soil layer (Figure 2). Regression analyses showed that SIC decreased quadratically in the 0–30 cm (R2 = 0.55, P = 0.05) and 0-100-cm soil layers (R2 = 0.87, P = 0.002) with increasing N addition (Table S2 in File S1). P addition had no apparent effect on SIC storage.
Figure 2

Changes in SIC within 0–30 cm and 0–100 cm soil layers with N addition.

Data are presented as mean ± 1 SD (n = 6), and those designated with the same letters are not significantly different (pan class="Chemical">P <0.05).

Effects of N and P addition on soil C sequestration

C sequestration by SOC content in the 0–100-cm soil layer ranged from 156 g C m-2 in N1 to 1352 g C m-2 in N6, and increased quadratically with the intensity of N input (R2 = 0.99, class="Chemical">P < 0.001; Figure 3). However, class="Chemical">pan class="Disease">SIC storage decreased logarithmically with increasing N addition (R2 = 0.79, P = 0.018), which was negatively correlated with soil pH (Figure 4). C sequestration by STC showed significant linear correlation with increasing N addition (R2 = 0.76, P =0.023). C sequestration by SOC and STC showed logarithmic response to increased P input (R2 = 0.56, P = 0.087 for STC; R2 = 0.82, P = 0.014 for STC) (Figure 3). Moreover, the efficiency of C gain decreased with increasing N and P input (Figure 5).
Figure 3

Soil C sequestration of grasslands in the 0–100 cm soil layer with N addition and P addition.

STC, soil total carbon; SOC, soil organic carbon; SIC, soil inorganic carbon.

Figure 4

Relationship between SIC and soil pH in response to N addition.

Figure 5

C gain efficiency of SOC under N addition (A) and P addition (B)

Soil C sequestration of grasslands in the 0–100 cm soil layer with N addition and P addition.

class="Chemical">STC, soil total class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbon; SOC, soil organic carbon; SIC, soil inorganic carbon.

Discussion

The addition of N enhances C storage in Inner Mongolian grasslands within aboveground biomass, litter, roots and soils. SOC storage in the 0–100 cm soil profile increased quadratically (from 156 to 1352 g C m-2) with the intensity of N input. The increase in C input by roots and aboveground biomass was the main reason for the increase in soil C storage (Table 1 and Table 2). Fornara and Tilman [26] found that the total ecosystem C storage increased significantly after 27 years of increasing N input, and suggesting N-induced increase in root mass and community transformation as the potential mechanisms. Roots make substantial C contributions to mineral soils [27], mainly through root turnover and decomposition but also through root exudation [14]. Compared with litter, roots are more important sources of new organic matter in Inner Mongolian grasslands [15]. Moreover, C gain efficiency decreased quadratically with increasing N and pan class="Chemical">P addition in Inner Mongolian grasslands (Figure 5), similar to the findings in the class="Chemical">prairie grasslands in the USA [26] and forests in Sweden and Finland [28]. Therefore, it is imclass="Chemical">portant to further investigate the underlying mechanisms of decreasing C gain efficiency in the future. The questions of where, how, and if N addition enhances soil C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems remain controversial [14,29]. Through a 5-year N-addition experiment (20 g N m-2), Zeng et al. [13] found that the C storage of roots and SOC in Keerqin sandy grasslands decreased by 84.8 and 128.5 g C m-2, respectively, although aboveground biomass and litter increased. In a 2-year N-addition experiment (17.5 g N m-2), Lu et al. [30] reported that the increase in C storage was 18.7, 8.7, and 377.9 g C m-2 in aboveground biomass, litter, and the 0–40 cm soil layer, respectively, but decreased by 90 g C m-2 in roots. Lu et al. [14] conducted a meta-analysis of 257 published studies and found that N addition had no significant effect on soil C storage in forests and grasslands, although N addition enhanced C inputs from vegetation to soil. Waldrop [31] found that soil C storage decreased significantly (20%) in a pan class="Species">sugar maple-dominated ecosystem but increased significantly (10%) in an oak-dominated ecosystem under 3-year N addition. Based on our findings, we conclude that Inner Mongolian grasslands have an aclass="Chemical">pclass="Chemical">parent class="Chemical">potential to sequester atmosclass="Chemical">pheric class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 in soil for scenarios of increasing N deposition. class="Chemical">P addition also enhanced soil C sequestration in semi-arid grasslands, but the increase showed a logarithmic relationshiclass="Chemical">p to the intensity of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P input. This founding implied a lower saturation level for P in terms of C sequestration. C gain efficiency decreased quadratically with increasing P input, which also supported this assumption. The possible explanation for the observed logarithmic relationship is that P absorption proficiency of plant species decreased in response to P addition intensities[32]. Niu et al. [33] reported that P addition has no apparent effect on net ecosystem exchange in temperate steppe. Based on the increase and trend observed for SOC, we suggest that N addition will have a greater effect than P addition in Inner Mongolian grasslands. Moreover, stoichiometry can provide a new approach for discussing the constraining effect of N and P on C sequestration [34], because the N:P ratio of soil organic matter (SOM) in Inner Mongolian grassland is constrained within a rather narrow range, with the C:N:P ratio being 98:6:1 for the experimental plot [24,35]. A decrease in soil pH is commonly observed with increasing reactive N input (N deposition or N addition experiments)[19-21]. Most studies have emphasized the regulatory effect of soil pH on SOM turnover due to the alternation of microbial communities and activity [9,36], but have ignored the effect of soil acidification on class="Chemical">SIC. In this study, the soil class="Chemical">pH decreased by 0.4–1.0 units in the surface soil layer and was significantly correlated with the intensity of N inclass="Chemical">put (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P <0.001). However, there were no apparent changes in pH within deeper soil profile during this 7-year N-addition experiment. However, a longer field experiment may be required to observe effects of N addition on pH in deeper soil layers. Soil pH after N addition depends on the balance between acid and non-acid cations on colloid surfaces and the balance between hydrogen (H+) and hydroxide (OH-) ions in soil solution. Theoretically, if all of the ammonium ions from ammonium sulfate are nitrified then 1 mol ammonium sulfate produces 4 mol acid (+). Thus, the application of 24 kg N ha-1 as ammonium sulfate requires nearly 165 kg CaCO3 ha-1 to neutralize it [37]. Along with increasing reactive N input (N fertilizer or increasing atmospheric N deposition), croplands and grasslands in China showed significant acidification from the 1980s to the 2000s [21,38]. Soil acidification could induce substantial class="Chemical">CO2 emission from dissolution of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbonates (such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and dolomite (MgCO3)) in semi-arid Inner Mongolian grasslands because of the high SIC content [22,23]. Our results showed that SIC decreased from 230.8 to 623.9 g C m-2 in the 0–100-cm soil layer in Inner Mongolian grasslands, and that the decreases in SIC could offset 46–76% of the increases in SOC associated with N addition. Yang et al. [23] estimated that, with a decrease 0.63 in the soil pH, SIC storage in the top 10 cm decreased by an average of 26.8 g C m−2 yr−1 in northern China. However, a few studies suggest that carbonates may be dissolved in surface soil (through the release of CO2fromdecomposition of soil organic matter or by the input of hydrogen ions from acid deposition) but re-precipitated in deep soil layers [23,38,39]. The relationship between soil acidification and SIC storage could be very important for the carbon cycle in semi-arid grasslands in northern China[22]. Therefore, future studies should also include assessment of SIC dynamics in order to accurately evaluate soil C sequestration under N deposition scenarios in semi-arid regions.

Conclusion

In the semi-arid Inner Mongolian grasslands, soil C sequestration increased quadratically with increasing N input due to the significant increase in litter and root C input; but C gain efficiency decreased with increasing N input. Soil C sequestration increased logarithmically with the intensity of class="Chemical">P inclass="Chemical">put and showed a lower saturation level for class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P than for N. Soil pH apparently decreased with N addition, which resulted in a loss of SIC of 230.8 to 623.9 g C m-2 in the 0–100-cm soil layer. Our findings demonstrated that loss of SIC could partially offset the increase in SOC associated with N addition. Therefore, future evaluation of soil C sequestration for scenarios of increasing N deposition should include changes in SIC storage, especially in semi-arid regions. Figure S1, Table S1 and Table S2. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  8 in total

1.  Linking stoichiometric homoeostasis with ecosystem structure, functioning and stability.

Authors:  Qiang Yu; Quansheng Chen; James J Elser; Nianpeng He; Honghui Wu; Guangming Zhang; Jianguo Wu; Yongfei Bai; Xingguo Han
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Stoichiometric control of organic carbon-nitrate relationships from soils to the sea.

Authors:  Philip G Taylor; Alan R Townsend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle.

Authors:  Nicolas Gruber; James N Galloway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Variable effects of nitrogen additions on the stability and turnover of soil carbon.

Authors:  Jason C Neff; Alan R Townsend; Gerd Gleixner; Scott J Lehman; Jocelyn Turnbull; William D Bowman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A global perspective on belowground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment.

Authors:  Lingli Liu; Tara L Greaver
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Stoichiometric homeostasis of vascular plants in the Inner Mongolia grassland.

Authors:  Qiang Yu; James J Elser; Nianpeng He; Honghui Wu; Quansheng Chen; Guangming Zhang; Xingguo Han
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands.

Authors:  J H Guo; X J Liu; Y Zhang; J L Shen; W X Han; W F Zhang; P Christie; K W T Goulding; P M Vitousek; F S Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Soil carbon sequestration in prairie grasslands increased by chronic nitrogen addition.

Authors:  Dario A Fornara; David Tilman
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.499

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Can short-term pasture management increase C balance in the Atlantic Rainforest?

Authors:  Paulo Roberto da Rocha Junior; Felipe Vaz Andrade; Lucas Santos Satiro; Guilherme Kangussú Donagemma; Eduardo de Sá Mendonça
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and Aggregate Stability with Grazing Exclusion in the Inner Mongolian Grasslands.

Authors:  Ding Wen; Nianpeng He; Jinjing Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Responses of soil hydrolytic enzymes, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea to nitrogen applications in a temperate grassland in Inner Mongolia.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Yuqian Tang; Yao Shi; Nianpeng He; Xuefa Wen; Qiang Yu; Chunyu Zheng; Xiaomin Sun; Weiwen Qiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effects of organic fertilizer on soil nutrient status, enzyme activity, and bacterial community diversity in Leymus chinensis steppe in Inner Mongolia, China.

Authors:  Lirong Shang; Liqiang Wan; Xiaoxin Zhou; Shuo Li; Xianglin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.