| Literature DB >> 24130570 |
Santiago Madriñán1, Andrés J Cortés, James E Richardson.
Abstract
Understanding the processes that cause speciation is a key aim of evolutionary biology. Lineages or biomes that exhibit recent and rapid diversification are ideal model systems for determining these processes. Species rich biomes reported to be of relatively recent origin, i.e., since the beginning of the Miocene, include Mediterranean ecosystems such as the California Floristic Province, oceanic islands such as the Hawaiian archipelago and the Neotropical high elevation ecosystem of the Páramos. Páramos constitute grasslands above the forest tree-line (at elevations of c. 2800-4700 m) with high species endemism. Organisms that occupy this ecosystem are a likely product of unique adaptations to an extreme environment that evolved during the last three to five million years when the Andes reached an altitude that was capable of sustaining this type of vegetation. We compared net diversification rates of lineages in fast evolving biomes using 73 dated molecular phylogenies. Based on our sample, we demonstrate that average net diversification rates of Páramo plant lineages are faster than those of other reportedly fast evolving hotspots and that the faster evolving lineages are more likely to be found in Páramos than the other hotspots. Páramos therefore represent the ideal model system for studying diversification processes. Most of the speciation events that we observed in the Páramos (144 out of 177) occurred during the Pleistocene possibly due to the effects of species range contraction and expansion that may have resulted from the well-documented climatic changes during that period. Understanding these effects will assist with efforts to determine how future climatic changes will impact plant populations.Entities:
Keywords: Páramos; biodiversity hotspots; biogeography; dated molecular phylogenies; evolutionary radiation; net diversification rates; plant evolution
Year: 2013 PMID: 24130570 PMCID: PMC3793228 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Figure 1Map indicating the present day area covered by Páramos (light red).
Figure 2Plants of the Páramos. Center: Páramo landscape with Chusquea tessellata (foreground) and Espeletia uribei (background): Frame (clockwise from top left): Sisyrinchium convolutum, Pterichis habenarioides, Bomarea pauciflora, Puya trianae, Oreobolus goeppingeri, Paepalanthus alpinus, Berberis goudotii, Ranunculus peruvianus, Echeveria bicolor, Hypericum goyanesii, Lachemilla orbiculata, Gaultheria anastomosans, Gentiana sedifolia, Halenia major, Lupinus alopecuroides, Aragoa abietina, Bartsia laniflora, Eryngium humboldtii, Myrrhidendron glaucescens, Diplostephium phylicoides, Hypochoeris sessiliflora, Espeletia killipii, Lysipomia laciniata and Valeriana stenophylla.
Net diversification rates of Páramo plant lineages.
| Plantaginaceae | 17 | Island | 0.60 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 0.92 | 17.83 | 5.10 | 2.33 | 5 of 5 | |
| Rubiaceae | 14 | 21.50 | 6.48 | 10.96 | 16.36 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 1of 11 | ||
| Berberidaceae | 32 | Crown node of | 37.30 | 0.07 | 3.80 | 9.7 | 39.61 | 0.73 | 0.29 | 4 of 17 | |
| Calceolariaceae | 65 | 15.00 | 1.42 | 2.50 | 3.51 | 2.45 | 1.39 | 0.99 | 23 of 23 | ||
| Brassicaceae | 55 | Brassicaceae crown node | 37.60 | 1.60 | 3.05 | 4.1 | 2.07 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 23 of 24 | |
| Espeletiinae | Asteraceae | 120 | 45.70 | 2.42 | 4.04 | 5.92 | 1.69 | 1.01 | 0.69 | 21 of 22 | |
| Poaceae | 36 | Loliinae crown node | 13.80 | 1.87 | 4.28 | 7.66 | 1.55 | 0.68 | 0.38 | 3 of 5 | |
| Pteridaceae | 32 | Multiple fossils | 7.60 | n.a. | 7.60 | n.a. | n.a. | 0.36 | n.a. | 0 of 2 | |
| Fabaceae | 66 | 16.01 | 1.18 | 1.47 | 1.76 | 2.96 | 2.38 | 1.99 | 32 of 32 | ||
| Campanulaceae | 27 | 11.10 | 6.61 | 8.96 | 11.19 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 13 of 20 | ||
| Cyperaceae | 5 | 5.10 | 1.67 | 3.01 | 4.71 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 0.19 | 3 of 5 | ||
| Bromeliaceae | 46 | 9.10 | 0.26 | 0.80 | 1.58 | 12.06 | 3.92 | 1.98 | 10 of 10 | ||
| Valerianaceae | 53 | Valerianaceae crown | 55.00 | 9.46 | 14.58 | 19.69 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 0.17 | n.a. | |
n, number of species within lineage; n.a., not available; Ma, million years ago.
Figure 3Comparison of net diversification rates ( Upper (triangle), lower (diamond), mean (square) and Standard Deviation around the mean net diversification rates (Y axis) for each hotspot. Sample sizes: Páramos n = 13; Mediterranean Floristic Province n = 8; Succulent Karoo n = 9; Hawaiian Archipelago n = 9; Cerrado n = 10; Cape Floristic Region n = 13; California Floristic Province n = 6; Southwest Australia n = 5; All Regions n = 73.
Biodiversity Hotspots species richness and mean net diversification rates.
| California Floristic Province | 293,804 | 8000 (2124) | 0.027 | 0.39 | 1.32 × 10−6 |
| Cape Floristic Region | 78,555 | 9000 (6210) | 0.196 | 0.40 | 5.05 × 10−6 |
| Cerrado | 2,031,990 | 12,669 (4215) | 0.060 | 0.58 | 0.29 × 10−6 |
| Hawaiian Archipelago | 28,311 | 1004 ( | 0.035 | 0.73 | 25.68 × 10−6 |
| Mediterranean Floristic Province | 2,085,292 | 22,500 (11,700) | 0.010 | 1.07 | 0.52 × 10−6 |
| Páramos | 35,000 | 3431 (*) | 0.098 | 1.36 | 38.80 × 10−6 |
| Southwest Australia | 356,717 | 5500 (2948) | 0.015 | 0.14 | 0.38 × 10−6 |
| Succulent Karoo | 102,691 | 6350 (2439) | 0.062 | 0.76 | 7.38 × 10−6 |
*Precise number of endemic species unknown, but close to 100%.