BACKGROUND: This prospective multicenter study assessed the prognostic influence of the extent of resection when compared with biopsy only in a contemporary patient population with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Histology, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and clinical data were centrally analyzed. Survival analyses were carried out with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were assessed with proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 345 patients, 273 underwent open tumor resection and 72 biopsies; 125 patients had gross total resections (GTRs) and 148, incomplete resections. Surgery-related morbidity was lower after biopsy (1.4% versus 12.1%, P = 0.007). 64.3% of patients received radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT plus CT), 20.0% RT alone, 4.3% CT alone, and 11.3% best supportive care as an initial treatment. Patients ≤60 years with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of ≥90 were more likely to receive RT plus CT (P < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) (progression free survival; PFS) ranged from 33.2 months (15 months) for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors after GTR and RT plus CT to 3.0 months (2.4 months) for biopsied patients receiving supportive care only. Favorable prognostic factors in multivariate analyses for OS were age ≤60 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52; P < 0.001], preoperative KPS of ≥80 (HR = 0.55; P < 0.001), GTR (HR = 0.60; P = 0.003), MGMT promoter methylation (HR = 0.44; P < 0.001), and RT plus CT (HR = 0.18, P < 0.001); patients undergoing incomplete resection did not better than those receiving biopsy only (HR = 0.85; P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: The value of incomplete resection remains questionable. If GTR cannot be safely achieved, biopsy only might be used as an alternative surgical strategy.
BACKGROUND: This prospective multicenter study assessed the prognostic influence of the extent of resection when compared with biopsy only in a contemporary patient population with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Histology, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and clinical data were centrally analyzed. Survival analyses were carried out with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were assessed with proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 345 patients, 273 underwent open tumor resection and 72 biopsies; 125 patients had gross total resections (GTRs) and 148, incomplete resections. Surgery-related morbidity was lower after biopsy (1.4% versus 12.1%, P = 0.007). 64.3% of patients received radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT plus CT), 20.0% RT alone, 4.3% CT alone, and 11.3% best supportive care as an initial treatment. Patients ≤60 years with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of ≥90 were more likely to receive RT plus CT (P < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) (progression free survival; PFS) ranged from 33.2 months (15 months) for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors after GTR and RT plus CT to 3.0 months (2.4 months) for biopsied patients receiving supportive care only. Favorable prognostic factors in multivariate analyses for OS were age ≤60 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52; P < 0.001], preoperative KPS of ≥80 (HR = 0.55; P < 0.001), GTR (HR = 0.60; P = 0.003), MGMT promoter methylation (HR = 0.44; P < 0.001), and RT plus CT (HR = 0.18, P < 0.001); patients undergoing incomplete resection did not better than those receiving biopsy only (HR = 0.85; P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: The value of incomplete resection remains questionable. If GTR cannot be safely achieved, biopsy only might be used as an alternative surgical strategy.
Entities:
Keywords:
MGMT; biopsy; extent of resection; glioblastoma; prognosis; temozolomide
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Sagar R Shah; Jayoung Kim; Paula Schiapparelli; Carla A Vazquez-Ramos; Juan C Martinez-Gutierrez; Alejandro Ruiz-Valls; Kyle Inman; James G Shamul; Jordan J Green; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Tiara S Napier; Neha Udayakumar; Aditi H Jani; Yolanda E Hartman; Hailey A Houson; Lindsay Moore; Hope M Amm; Nynke S van den Berg; Anna G Sorace; Jason M Warram Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Philipp Kickingereder; Christina Hamisch; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Roland Goldbrunner; Martin Kocher; Harald Treuer; Juergen Voges; Maximilian I Ruge Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Martin N Stienen; David Y Zhang; Morgan Broggi; Dominik Seggewiss; Stefano Villa; Silvia Schiavolin; Oliver Bozinov; Niklaus Krayenbühl; Johannes Sarnthein; Paolo Ferroli; Luca Regli Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 4.130