Literature DB >> 24129868

Effect of a web-based curriculum on primary care practice: basic skin cancer triage trial.

Alina Markova1, Martin A Weinstock, Patricia Risica, Usree Kirtania, Waqas Shaikh, Hernando Ombao, Christopher V Chambers, Martin L Kabango, James K Kallail, Douglas Post.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are uniquely positioned to detect melanoma. Effective educational interventions targeted at PCPs may improve early melanoma detection. A previous in-person Basic Skin Cancer Triage (BSCT) 2-hour course demonstrated significant short-term improvement in provider practices, attitudes, ability, confidence, and knowledge. We conducted a randomized trial to test the efficacy of the BSCT course implemented as a web-based learning program, compared to a similar (control) web-based course on weight assessment.
METHODS: We recruited a sample of 57 PCPs and 3,341 of their patients from four geographically diverse centers. Skin cancer control activities by PCPs were assessed by physician survey and by chart review and patient telephone interview about their recent visit to their PCP at baseline and at 1--2 months and 12 months after course completion.
RESULTS: Some effect of intervention on skin cancer parameters was self-reported by physicians; this was not confirmed by patient survey or chart-extracted data. Rates of skin cancer control practices by PCPs were low across both groups before and after intervention. The positive changes in physician-reported behaviors (total body skin examination [TBSE]), intentions (discuss skin cancer detection), confidence (performing TBSE), office practices, and knowledge (58% skin versus 49% control) were neither matched by differences in practice reported by their patients, nor persisted in a longer term follow-up, hence may be attributable to physician recall bias due to the experience of the course or desire to please study investigators and were less dramatic as compared to our previously reported in-person BSCT intervention. Thus this approach by itself appears unlikely to result in improved PCP handling of skin cancer issues.
CONCLUSIONS: Given previous success with our in-person course, the features required to make WBL a more effective tool for medical education must be further explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24129868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  9 in total

Review 1.  State of melanoma: an historic overview of a field in transition.

Authors:  Vikram C Gorantla; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 2.  Skin Cancer Education Interventions for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ashley E Brown; Maleka Najmi; Taylor Duke; Daniel A Grabell; Misha V Koshelev; Kelly C Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Incongruence between Physician, Patient, and Medical Chart Report of Skin Cancer Prevention Counseling.

Authors:  Natalie H Matthews; Augustine W Kang; Martin A Weinstock; Patricia Markham Risica
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Dissecting the Contemporary Clerkship: Theory-based Educational Trial of Videos Versus Lectures in Medical Student Education.

Authors:  Stella H M Yiu; Alena M Spacek; Paul G Pageau; Michael Y C Woo; A Curtis Lee; Jason R Frank
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-07-16

Review 5.  The Effectiveness of mHealth and eHealth Tools in Improving Provider Knowledge, Confidence, and Behaviors Related to Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survivorship Care: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cindy Soloe; Olivia Burrus; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Training general practitioners in melanoma diagnosis: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Evelyne Harkemanne; Marie Baeck; Isabelle Tromme
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Psychosocial consequences of skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Markham Risica; Natalie H Matthews; Laura Dionne; Jennifer Mello; Laura K Ferris; Melissa Saul; Alan C Geller; Francis Solano; John M Kirkwood; Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 8.  An integrative review of e-learning in the delivery of self-management support training for health professionals.

Authors:  Sharon Lawn; Xiaojuan Zhi; Andrea Morello
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Educational Interventions to Support Primary Care Provider Performance of Diagnostic Skin Cancer Examinations: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Eliza L Posada; Kyle C Lauck; Tiffaney Tran; Kate J Krause; Kelly C Nelson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.037

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.