Literature DB >> 24129842

E-mental health self-management for psychotic disorders: state of the art and future perspectives.

Lian van der Krieke, Lex Wunderink, Ando C Emerencia, Peter de Jonge, Sjoerd Sytema.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to investigate to what extent information technology may support self-management among service users with psychotic disorders. The investigation aimed to answer the following questions: What types of e-mental health self-management interventions have been developed and evaluated? What is the current evidence on clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of the identified interventions? To what extent are e-mental health self-management interventions oriented toward the service user?
METHODS: A systematic review of references through July 2012 derived from MEDLINE, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, and the Library, Information Science and Technology database was performed. Studies of e-mental health self-management interventions for persons with psychotic disorders were selected independently by three reviewers.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. E-mental health self-management interventions included psychoeducation, medication management, communication and shared decision making, management of daily functioning, lifestyle management, peer support, and real-time self-monitoring by daily measurements (experience sampling monitoring). Summary effect sizes were large for medication management (.92) and small for psychoeducation (.37) and communication and shared decision making (.21). For all other studies, individual effect sizes were calculated. The only economic analysis conducted reported more short-term costs for the e-mental health intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: People with psychotic disorders were able and willing to use e-mental health services. Results suggest that e-mental health services are at least as effective as usual care or nontechnological approaches. Larger effects were found for medication management e-mental health services. No studies reported a negative effect. Results must be interpreted cautiously, because they are based on a small number of studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24129842     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  42 in total

Review 1.  Crowdsourcing for conducting randomized trials of internet delivered interventions in people with serious mental illness: A systematic review.

Authors:  John A Naslund; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Lisa A Marsch; Gregory J McHugo; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  User profiles of an electronic mental health tool for ecological momentary assessment: MEmind.

Authors:  María Luisa Barrigón; Sofian Berrouiguet; Juan José Carballo; Covadonga Bonal-Giménez; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; Bernadette Pfang; David Delgado-Gómez; Philippe Courtet; Fuensanta Aroca; Jorge Lopez-Castroman; Antonio Artés-Rodríguez; Enrique Baca-García
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Using Smartphone Apps to Promote Psychiatric and Physical Well-Being.

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Trishan Panch; Yale M Hicks; Jason S Scolnick; David Lyle Weene; Dost Öngür; Bruce M Cohen
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2015-12

4.  Potential Benefits of Incorporating Peer-to-Peer Interactions Into Digital Interventions for Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bruno Biagianti; Sophia H Quraishi; Danielle A Schlosser
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  Usefulness of telepsychiatry: A critical evaluation of videoconferencing-based approaches.

Authors:  Subho Chakrabarti
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-22

Review 6.  Emerging mHealth and eHealth interventions for serious mental illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  John A Naslund; Lisa A Marsch; Gregory J McHugo; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2015-05-28

7.  Efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia: systematic overview and quality appraisal of the meta-analytic evidence.

Authors:  Marco Solmi; Giovanni Croatto; Giada Piva; Stella Rosson; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Jose M Rubio; Andre F Carvalho; Eduard Vieta; Celso Arango; Nicole R DeTore; Elizabeth S Eberlin; Kim T Mueser; Christoph U Correll
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 13.437

8.  The potential of technology for enhancing individual placement and support supported employment.

Authors:  Sarah E Lord; Susan R McGurk; Joanne Nicholson; Elizabeth A Carpenter-Song; Justin S Tauscher; Deborah R Becker; Sarah J Swanson; Robert E Drake; Gary R Bond
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2014-06

9.  Paving the Way to Successful Implementation: Identifying Key Barriers to Use of Technology-Based Therapeutic Tools for Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Alex Ramsey; Sarah Lord; John Torrey; Lisa Marsch; Michael Lardiere
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.505

10.  A qualitative study of stakeholder views on the use of a digital app for supported self-management in early intervention services for psychosis.

Authors:  Thomas Steare; Maria Giorgalli; Katherine Free; Jasmine Harju-Seppänen; Syeda Akther; Michelle Eskinazi; Puffin O'Hanlon; Helen Rostill; Sarah Amani; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans; David Osborn; Sonia Johnson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.