Literature DB >> 24129798

Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after gastroesophageal cancer resection is associated with reduced long-term survival.

Steen Christian Kofoed1, Dan Calatayud, Lone Susanne Jensen, Marianne Vinbaek Jensen, Lars Bo Svendsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most likely because of low statistical power, no previous studies have shown any significant association between long-term survival and anastomotic leakage in patients who have undergone gastroesophageal cancer resection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study included, prospectively and consecutively, nationwide collected patients who underwent gastroesophageal cancer resection between 2003 and 2011 in Denmark. The operation was carried out as an Ivor Lewis procedure. Only patients with intrathoracic anastomosis were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: From 2003 to 2011, 1,296 patients underwent gastroesophageal resection, and 128 (9.9 %) of these experienced anastomotic leakage. The overall 5-year survival rates in patients with and without anastomotic leakage were 20 and 35 % (P < 0.0001), respectively. After exclusion of 4 weeks mortality, the 5-year survival rate in patients with leakage was 22 % compared to 36 % in patients without anastomotic leakage (P < 0.001). After exclusion of 8 weeks mortality, the 5-year survival rate was 23 % in patients with leakage and 36 % in those without (P = 0.009). The corresponding median time of survival was 74 versus 128, 87 versus 138, and 95 versus 138 weeks, respectively. The overall hazard ratios of death after anastomotic leakage, unadjusted, and after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, were 1.59 (1.27-1.99) and 1.45 (1.14-1.84). The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios after exclusion of 4 weeks mortality were 1.51 (1.19-1.90) and 1.41 (1.10-1.81). After exclusion of 8 weeks mortality the odds ratios were 1.38 (1.08-1.77) and 1.32 (1.02-1.71).
CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study confirms that patients experiencing anastomotic leakage after gastroesophageal cancer resection have a significantly lower long-term survival, even following full recovery after the leakage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24129798     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2245-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C S McArdle; D C McMillan; D J Hole
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Prevalence and outcome of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in a UK regional cancer network.

Authors:  X Escofet; A Manjunath; C Twine; T J Havard; G W Clark; W G Lewis
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Martin Rutegård; Pernilla Lagergren; Ioannis Rouvelas; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Stapled anastomosis in esophageal resections with Chinese staplers: a retrospective study of 1965 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Y Sun; B Ding; N Zhou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  L T Sørensen; T Jørgensen; L T Kirkeby; J Skovdal; B Vennits; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Fate of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Eero I T Sihvo; Markku E Luostarinen; Jarmo A Salo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Single-layered cervical esophageal anastomoses: a prospective study of two suturing techniques.

Authors:  R Bardini; L Bonavina; M Asolati; A Ruol; C Castoro; E Tiso
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  H Ptok; F Marusch; F Meyer; D Schubert; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Laser speckle contrast imaging and quantitative fluorescence angiography for perfusion assessment.

Authors:  Jonas Hedelund Rønn; Nikolaj Nerup; Rune Broni Strandby; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Rikard Ambrus; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Single Snapshot Imaging of Optical Properties (SSOP) for Perfusion Assessment during Gastric Conduit Creation for Esophagectomy: An Experimental Study on Pigs.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cinelli; Eric Felli; Luca Baratelli; Silvère Ségaud; Andrea Baiocchini; Nariaki Okamoto; María Rita Rodríguez-Luna; Ugo Elmore; Riccardo Rosati; Stefano Partelli; Jacques Marescaux; Sylvain Gioux; Michele Diana
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.