Literature DB >> 24128766

A novel computer algorithm allows for volumetric and cross-sectional area analysis of indirect decompression following transpsoas lumbar arthrodesis despite variations in MRI technique.

Timothy A Gates1, Ram R Vasudevan2, Kai J Miller2, Vasiliki Stamatopoulou2, Stefan A Mindea2.   

Abstract

Many patients present for neurosurgical spine evaluation with MRI studies conducted at facilities outside of the treating medical center. These images often vary widely in technique, for example, variation in slice thickness, number of slices, and gantry angle. While these images may be sufficient in conjunction with a physical exam to make surgical evaluations, we have found they are often incapable of being used for objective post-operative volumetric comparisons. In order to overcome this, we created a computer program that compensates for these variations in MRI technique. For this study, we examined patients who had undergone outside MRI pre-operatively and were deemed appropriate for a lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody arthrodesis procedure. Volumetric analysis was performed on sagittal and axial T2-weighted pre- and post-operative MRI. The percentage change of central canal volume and foraminal area was calculated for each level. The authors identified five levels with MRI sufficient for volumetric analysis and eight levels (16 foramina) sufficient for foraminal cross-sectional analysis. Through use of our computer algorithm, average central canal volume and foraminal cross-sectional area was calculated to increase by 32.8% and 67.6% respectively following the procedure. These results are consistent with previous study findings and support the idea that restoration of the anterior column via a lateral approach can result in significant indirect decompression of the neural elements. Additionally, the novel algorithm created and used for this study suggests that it can achieve quick measurement and comparison of MRI studies despite variations in pre- and post-operative technique.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer analysis; Indirect decompression; Lateral interbody arthrodesis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24128766     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  4 in total

1.  Central and foraminal indirect decompression in MIS lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): video lecture.

Authors:  Eric H Elowitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Resting Pain Level as a Preoperative Predictor of Success With Indirect Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Amrit S Khalsa; Areian Eghbali; Robert K Eastlack; Stacie Tran; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Justin B Ledesma; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-07-26

4.  A novel three-dimensional volumetric method to measure indirect decompression after percutaneous cement discoplasty.

Authors:  Peter Endre Eltes; Laszlo Kiss; Ferenc Bereczki; Zsolt Szoverfi; Chloé Techens; Gabor Jakab; Benjamin Hajnal; Peter Pal Varga; Aron Lazary
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.