Literature DB >> 24128282

Demographic responses of a site-faithful and territorial predator to its fluctuating prey: long-tailed skuas and arctic lemmings.

Frédéric Barraquand1, Toke T Høye2,3, John-André Henden1, Nigel G Yoccoz1, Olivier Gilg4,5, Niels M Schmidt2,6, Benoît Sittler5,7, Rolf A Ims1.   

Abstract

Environmental variability, through interannual variation in food availability or climatic variables, is usually detrimental to population growth. It can even select for constancy in key life-history traits, though some exceptions are known. Changes in the level of environmental variability are therefore important to predict population growth or life-history evolution. Recently, several cyclic vole and lemming populations have shown large dynamical changes that might affect the demography or life-histories of rodent predators. Skuas constitute an important case study among rodent predators, because of their strongly saturating breeding productivity (they lay only two eggs) and high degree of site fidelity, in which they differ from nomadic predators raising large broods in good rodent years. This suggests that they cannot capitalize on lemming peaks to the same extent as nomadic predators and might be more vulnerable to collapses of rodent cycles. We develop a model for the population dynamics of long-tailed skuas feeding on lemmings to assess the demographic consequences of such variable and non-stationary prey dynamics, based on data collected in NE Greenland. The model shows that populations of long-tailed skua sustain well changes in lemming dynamics, including temporary collapses (e.g. 10 years). A high floater-to-breeder ratio emerges from rigid territorial behaviour and a long-life expectancy, which buffers the impact of adult abundance's decrease on the population reproductive output. The size of the floater compartment is affected by changes in both mean and coefficient of variation of lemming densities (but not cycle amplitude and periodicity per se). In Greenland, the average lemming density is below the threshold density required for successful breeding (including during normally cyclic periods). Due to Jensen's inequality, skuas therefore benefit from lemming variability; a positive effect of environmental variation. Long-tailed skua populations are strongly adapted to fluctuating lemming populations, an instance of demographic lability in the reproduction rate. They are also little affected by poor lemming periods, if there are enough floaters, or juveniles disperse to neighbouring populations. The status of Greenland skua populations therefore strongly depends upon floater numbers and juvenile movements, which are not known. This reveals a need to intensify colour-ringing efforts on the long-tailed skua at a circumpolar scale.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  demographic buffering; environmental variance; floaters; population cycles; territoriality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24128282     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

1.  A nomadic avian predator displays flexibility in prey choice during episodic outbreaks of rodents in arid Australia.

Authors:  Chris R Pavey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Dampening prey cycle overrides the impact of climate change on predator population dynamics: a long-term demographic study on tawny owls.

Authors:  Alexandre Millon; Steve J Petty; Brian Little; Olivier Gimenez; Thomas Cornulier; Xavier Lambin
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Interaction webs in arctic ecosystems: Determinants of arctic change?

Authors:  Niels M Schmidt; Bess Hardwick; Olivier Gilg; Toke T Høye; Paul Henning Krogh; Hans Meltofte; Anders Michelsen; Jesper B Mosbacher; Katrine Raundrup; Jeroen Reneerkens; Lærke Stewart; Helena Wirta; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Quantifying the demographic cost of human-related mortality to a raptor population.

Authors:  W Grainger Hunt; J David Wiens; Peter R Law; Mark R Fuller; Teresa L Hunt; Daniel E Driscoll; Ronald E Jackman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An ecosystem-wide reproductive failure with more snow in the Arctic.

Authors:  Niels Martin Schmidt; Jeroen Reneerkens; Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen; Martin Olesen; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Temporal correlations among demographic parameters are ubiquitous but highly variable across species.

Authors:  Rémi Fay; Sandra Hamel; Martijn van de Pol; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Nigel G Yoccoz; Paul Acker; Matthieu Authier; Benjamin Larue; Christie Le Coeur; Kaitlin R Macdonald; Alex Nicol-Harper; Christophe Barbraud; Christophe Bonenfant; Dirk H Van Vuren; Emmanuelle Cam; Karine Delord; Marlène Gamelon; Maria Moiron; Fanie Pelletier; Jay Rotella; Celine Teplitsky; Marcel E Visser; Caitlin P Wells; Nathaniel T Wheelwright; Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 11.274

Review 7.  COMADRE: a global data base of animal demography.

Authors:  Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Owen R Jones; C Ruth Archer; Christoph Bein; Hendrik de Buhr; Claudia Farack; Fränce Gottschalk; Alexander Hartmann; Anne Henning; Gabriel Hoppe; Gesa Römer; Tara Ruoff; Veronika Sommer; Julia Wille; Jakob Voigt; Stefan Zeh; Dirk Vieregg; Yvonne M Buckley; Judy Che-Castaldo; David Hodgson; Alexander Scheuerlein; Hal Caswell; James W Vaupel
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Barn Owl Productivity Response to Variability of Vole Populations.

Authors:  Petr Pavluvčík; Karel Poprach; Ivo Machar; Jan Losík; Ana Gouveia; Emil Tkadlec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.