Literature DB >> 24128280

Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes.

María Ángeles Rodríguez de Cara1, Beatriz Villanueva, Miguel Ángel Toro, Jesús Fernández.   

Abstract

Conservation programmes aim at maximizing the survival probability of populations, by minimizing the loss of genetic diversity, which allows populations to adapt to changes, and controlling inbreeding increases. The best known strategy to achieve these goals is optimizing the contributions of the parents to minimize global coancestry in their offspring. Results on neutral scenarios showed that management based on molecular coancestry could maintain more diversity than management based on genealogical coancestry when a large number of markers were available. However, if the population has deleterious mutations, managing using optimal contributions can lead to a decrease in fitness, especially using molecular coancestry, because both beneficial and harmful alleles are maintained, compromising the long-term viability of the population. We introduce here two strategies to avoid this problem: The first one uses molecular coancestry calculated removing markers with low minor allele frequencies, as they could be linked to selected loci. The second one uses a coancestry based on segments of identity by descent, which measures the proportion of genome segments shared by two individuals because of a common ancestor. We compare these strategies under two contrasting mutational models of fitness effects, one assuming many mutations of small effect and another with few mutations of large effect. Using markers at intermediate frequencies maintains a larger fitness than using all markers, but leads to maintaining less diversity. Using the segment-based coancestry provides a compromise solution between maintaining diversity and fitness, especially when the population has some inbreeding load.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genome-wide; management; runs of homozygosity; segments of identity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24128280     DOI: 10.1111/mec.12560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  22 in total

1.  Changes in Allele Frequencies When Different Genomic Coancestry Matrices Are Used for Maintaining Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Elisabeth Morales-González; Jesús Fernández; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Miguel Ángel Toro; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Genome-wide estimates of coancestry, inbreeding and effective population size in the Spanish Holstein population.

Authors:  Silvia Teresa Rodríguez-Ramilo; Jesús Fernández; Miguel Angel Toro; Delfino Hernández; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations.

Authors:  Mirte Bosse; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Ole Madsen; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Oliver A Ryder; Frédéric Austerlitz; Martien A M Groenen; M Angeles R de Cara
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Detecting inbreeding depression for reproductive traits in Iberian pigs using genome-wide data.

Authors:  María Saura; Almudena Fernández; Luis Varona; Ana I Fernández; Maria Ángeles R de Cara; Carmen Barragán; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Genetic assessments and parentage analysis of captive Bolson tortoises (Gopherus flavomarginatus) inform their "rewilding" in New Mexico.

Authors:  Taylor Edwards; Elizabeth Canty Cox; Vanessa Buzzard; Christiane Wiese; L Scott Hillard; Robert W Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Artificial selection with traditional or genomic relationships: consequences in coancestry and genetic diversity.

Authors:  Silvia Teresa Rodríguez-Ramilo; Luis Alberto García-Cortés; María Ángeles Rodríguez de Cara
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Using genomics to characterize evolutionary potential for conservation of wild populations.

Authors:  Katherine A Harrisson; Alexandra Pavlova; Marina Telonis-Scott; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Which Individuals To Choose To Update the Reference Population? Minimizing the Loss of Genetic Diversity in Animal Genomic Selection Programs.

Authors:  Sonia E Eynard; Pascal Croiseau; Denis Laloë; Sebastien Fritz; Mario P L Calus; Gwendal Restoux
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  The Use of Genomics in Conservation Management of the Endangered Visayan Warty Pig (Sus cebifrons).

Authors:  Rascha J M Nuijten; Mirte Bosse; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Ole Madsen; Willem Schaftenaar; Oliver A Ryder; Martien A M Groenen; Hendrik-Jan Megens
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Very Low Population Structure in a Highly Mobile and Wide-Ranging Endangered Bird Species.

Authors:  Lynna Kvistad; Dean Ingwersen; Alexandra Pavlova; James K Bull; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.