Literature DB >> 2412798

The assessment of two methods for removing eye movement artefact from the EEG.

B W Jervis, M J Nichols, E M Allen, N R Hudson, T E Johnson.   

Abstract

A quantitative assessment of both computerised correlation and analogue techniques for the removal of eye movement artefact from the electroencephalogram was undertaken. In both methods a fraction of the measured EOGs was subtracted from the measured EEG to leave the corrected EEG. In the correlation method the correction factors were computed from the cross-correlations of the EOGs and measured EEGs. In the analogue method the fraction subtracted was derived using a potential divider arrangement. The relative effectiveness of the two methods was determined by comparing the autocorrelation functions of the corrected EEGs at a lag of 2 sec. It was found that the computerised correlation technique was superior. A 3-channel EOG correlation correction procedure was found adequate in which two horizontal and one vertical EOGs were used. The analogue technique was very time consuming and possibly erroneous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2412798     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91037-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  14 in total

1.  Effects of trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) on interhemispheric communication.

Authors:  HeeSeung Lee; Rob R Kydd; Vanessa K Lim; Ian J Kirk; Bruce R Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  The removal of ocular artefacts from the electroencephalogram: a review.

Authors:  B W Jervis; E C Ifeachor; E M Allen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Topographic mapping of EEG and evoked potentials in psychiatry: delusions, illusions, and realities.

Authors:  M W Torello
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Investigation and comparison of some models for removing ocular artefacts from EEG signals. Part 2. Quantitative and pictorial comparison of models.

Authors:  E C Ifeachor; B W Jervis; E M Allen; E L Morris; D E Wright; N R Hudson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Investigation and comparison of some models for removing ocular artefacts from EEG signals. Part 1. Review of models and data analysis.

Authors:  E C Ifeachor; B W Jervis; E M Allen; E L Morris; D E Wright; N R Hudson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  New online method for removing ocular artefacts from EEG signals.

Authors:  E C Ifeachor; B W Jervis; E L Morris; E M Allen; N R Hudson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials. II: Source dipoles and source components.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; P Berg; M Scherg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  On-line method for enhancement of electroencephalogram signals in presence of electro-oculogram artefacts using nonlinear recursive least squares technique.

Authors:  K D Rao; D C Reddy
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Effect on EEG responses of removing ocular artefacts by proportional EOG subtraction.

Authors:  B W Jervis; M Coelho; G W Morgan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Acute effects of BZP, TFMPP and the combination of BZP and TFMPP in comparison to dexamphetamine on an auditory oddball task using electroencephalography: a single-dose study.

Authors:  HeeSeung Lee; Grace Y Wang; Louise E Curley; John J Sollers; Rob R Kydd; Ian J Kirk; Bruce R Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.