| Literature DB >> 24127679 |
Peter J Gilling1, Rana M Reuther, Michael Addidle, Michelle M Lockhart, Christopher M Frampton, Mark R Fraundorfer.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, safety and cost of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde; 1,2-benzenedicarboxaldehyde) in an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) for high-level disinfection of flexible cystoscopes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomised single-blind study comparing the high-level disinfectants Tristel Fuse as a simple office-based soak and Cidex OPA using an AER was performed. Participants were 'blinded' to the agent used for disinfection of the flexible cystoscopes. All patients had negative mid-stream urine at baseline, (MSU) no symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infection (UTI) on the day of investigation, no recent antibiotic use or current indwelling urinary catheter. Patients who underwent cystoscopic biopsy during the procedure were excluded. A urine analysis was done before and 3-5 days after cystoscopy and multiple equipment cultures were performed. The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6 + two questions from the 'long-form'), symptom and quality-of-life scores were assessed before and after cystoscopy as were ease-of-use assessments and a full cost analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Cidex-OPA; chlorine dioxide; flexible cystoscopy; high-level disinfection; randomised trial
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24127679 DOI: 10.1111/bju.12208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BJU Int ISSN: 1464-4096 Impact factor: 5.588