Sergio Amadori1, Stefan Suciu, Roberto Stasi, Helmut R Salih, Dominik Selleslag, Petra Muus, Paolo De Fabritiis, Adriano Venditti, Anthony D Ho, Michael Lübbert, Xavier Thomas, Roberto Latagliata, Constantijn J M Halkes, Franca Falzetti, Domenico Magro, José E Guimaraes, Zwi Berneman, Giorgina Specchia, Matthias Karrasch, Paola Fazi, Marco Vignetti, Roel Willemze, Theo de Witte, Jean-Pierre Marie. 1. Sergio Amadori and Adriano Venditti, Tor Vergata University Hospital; Paolo De Fabritiis, St Eugenio Hospital; Roberto Latagliata, University Sapienza; Paola Fazi and Marco Vignetti, Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto, Roma; Franca Falzetti, University Hospital, Perugia; Domenico Magro, Pugliese Hospital, Catanzaro; Giorgina Specchia, University Hospital, Bari, Italy; Stefan Suciu and Matthias Karrasch, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels; Dominik Selleslag, Algemeen Ziekenhuis St Jan, Brugge; Zwi Berneman, University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Roberto Stasi, St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Helmut R. Salih, University Hospital, Tubingen; Anthony D. Ho, University Hospital, Heidelberg; Michael Lübbert, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany; Petra Muus and Theo de Witte, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Constantijn J.M. Halkes and Roel Willemze, University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Xavier Thomas, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon; Jean-Pierre Marie, St. Antoine Hospital, Paris, France; and José E. Guimaraes, University Hospital, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m(2) on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality. CONCLUSION: As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age ≥ 70 years.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m(2) on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality. CONCLUSION: As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age ≥ 70 years.
Authors: Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield Journal: Blood Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: W Zeijlemaker; A Kelder; Y J M Oussoren-Brockhoff; W J Scholten; A N Snel; D Veldhuizen; J Cloos; G J Ossenkoppele; G J Schuurhuis Journal: Leukemia Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 11.528