Literature DB >> 24126585

Reevaluation of ceftazidime dosing recommendations in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Katie E Cardone1, Darren W Grabe, Evan J Zasowski, Thomas P Lodise.   

Abstract

While intraperitoneal (i.p.) ceftazidime is commonly used to treat continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)-related infections, the ability of i.p. regimens to achieve critical pharmacodynamic targets in both blood and dialysate has not been reported. To understand the pharmacodynamic profile of ceftazidime during CAPD, data were obtained from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) i.p. ceftazidime study that included 10 CAPD patients who received i.p. ceftazidime at 15 mg/kg of body weight. The probability of target attainment (concentrations maintained above the MIC for >60% of the dosing interval [60% T > MIC]) was determined for six simulated regimens. A 3-compartment model with each dialysis dwell modeled as a separate differential equation was fit to ceftazidime concentrations using BigNPAG. Embedded with the final PK model, serum and dialysate concentration-time profiles of ceftazidime at 1, 1.5, and 2 g i.p. every 24 h (q24h) to q48h were simulated using ADAPT 5. The mean population pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: apparent volume of the central compartment (Vc), 7.57 liter; apparent volume of the peritoneal cavity (Vpd), 2.44 liter; clearance from the central compartment (CL), 0.379 liter/h; intercompartmental transfer rate constants (first order) between the central and peripheral compartments (k12 and k21), 4.66 and 4.88 h(-1), respectively; and intercompartmental transfer rate constants (first order) between the central and peritoneal compartments (k13 and k31), 0.111 and 0.227 h(-1), respectively. In serum, the probability of target attainment for MICs of ≤8 mg/liter exceeded 90% for 1.5 to 2 g i.p. q24h to q48h. However, no tested regimen provided adequate dialysate exposure at MICs of ≥8 mg/liter on day 1 without the use of a 3-g loading dose (post hoc analysis). On day 2, 1.5 to 2 g i.p. q24h or 2 g i.p. q48h provided adequate exposure in the peritoneal cavity. These results should be validated in the presence of infection. Ceftazidime i.p. at 1.5 or 2 g q24h to q48h is recommended for nonperitoneal infections. For peritonitis, a 3-g load with maintenance dosing of 1 to 2 g i.p. q24h or 2 g i.p. q48h is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24126585      PMCID: PMC3910753          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00873-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  26 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'.

Authors:  George L Drusano
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Absorption and clearance of ceftazidime during CAPD.

Authors:  W D Plant; U Martin; W Barron; P K Scouse; R J Winney; L F Prescott
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1995 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Antimicrobial-resistant, Gram-positive bacteria among patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis.

Authors:  Erika M C D'Agata
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  Retrospective review of neurotoxicity induced by cefepime and ceftazidime.

Authors:  Kai Ming Chow; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Andrew Che-Fai Hui; Teresa Yuk-Hwa Wong; Philip Kam-Tao Li
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  A Tourkantonis; P Nicolaidis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  [Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime injected peritoneally in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis].

Authors:  J P Ryckelynck; M Vergnaud; B Hurault de Ligny; G Allouche; B Malbruny; C Morel
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1986-05

7.  Association of dialysis modality with risk for infection-related hospitalization: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Lafrance; Elham Rahme; Sameena Iqbal; Naoual Elftouh; Michel Vallée; Louis-Philippe Laurin; Denis Ouimet
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intraperitoneal ceftazidime in chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  F Demotes-Mainard; G Vinçon; J M Ragnaud; P Morlat; B Bannwarth; J Dangoumau
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Two general methods for population pharmacokinetic modeling: non-parametric adaptive grid and non-parametric Bayesian.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatarinova; Michael Neely; Jay Bartroff; Michael van Guilder; Walter Yamada; David Bayard; Roger Jelliffe; Robert Leary; Alyona Chubatiuk; Alan Schumitzky
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in CAPD-related peritonitis.

Authors:  Voravut Booranalertpaisarn; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Supeecha Wittayalertpanya; Talerngsak Kanjanabutr; Duangchit Panomwana Na Ayudhya
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pasteurella multocida Bacteremia Secondary to Peritoneal Dialysis Associated Peritonitis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  John M Giacona; Maxwell Weiner; John Hanna; Tomasz Jodlowski; Roger Bedimo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-16

Review 2.  ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Javier de Arteaga; Stanley Fan; Ana E Figueiredo; Douglas N Fish; Eric Goffin; Yong-Lim Kim; William Salzer; Dirk G Struijk; Isaac Teitelbaum; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.756

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.