| Literature DB >> 24126463 |
Abstract
Elbow region fractures are the most common injuries in children. Among them, supracondylar fractures of the humerus are the most frequent. Massive displacement of the fractured bone causes severe injury to the soft tissue of that particular region. As a result, various types of injuries to the brachial artery such as entrapment, laceration, spasm of the vessel, and the presence of an intimal tear or thrombus formation are usually observed. The main goal of this study was to present our approach to children with supracondylar humerus fractures associated with brachial artery injuries. We would especially like to emphasize the necessity for other conservative or operative treatment concerning pulseless hand symptoms coexisting with supracondylar fractures of the humeral bone in children population. Data from 67 children were evaluated in our study. Supracondylar fractures were classified according to the Gartland's scale. All patients had displaced extension type III injuries. During our follow-up study, we used Flynn's grading system to evaluate functions of the elbow joint, forearm and wrist. Mean follow-up was 18 months; range, 13 months to 4 years. In the follow-up study, very good or good results were achieved in all 32 patients treated conservatively together with 6 patients with pulseless pink hand symptom. Very good or good results were achieved in 88% of 35 patients operated on. Children who, after satisfactory closed reduction, have a well-perfused hand but absent radial pulse do not necessarily require routine exploration of the brachial artery. Conservative treatment should be applied unless additional signs of vascular compromise appear. Thus, exploration of the cubital fossa should be performed only if circulation is not restored by closed reduction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24126463 PMCID: PMC4242976 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1337-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ISSN: 1633-8065
Fig. 1X-ray of third type of supracondylar humerus fracture
Fig. 2X-ray of third type of supracondylar humerus fracture after reduction—anteroposterior view
Fig. 3X-ray of third type of supracondylar humerus fracture after reduction—lateral view
Type of operations and morphology of brachial artery injury in patients with supracondylar fractures of the humerus bone
| Type of operation | Morphology of the injury | Number of patients |
|---|---|---|
| Osteosynthesis of the humerus bone, removal of the hematoma and the adventitia. Nerve’s decompression | Adventitial hematoma formation and arterial spasm, nerve contusion | 10 |
| Osteosynthesis of the humerus bone, evacuation of the artery thrombus. Using of Fogarty’s catheter with low molecular weight anticoagulant drug flushing. Nerve’s decompression | Artery occlusion (because of thrombus formation), nerve contusion | 6 |
| Osteosynthesis of the humerus bone, removal of the adventitia | Isolated brachial artery contusion | 6 |
| Osteosynthesis of the humerus bone, anastomosis with a synthetic, non-absorbable monofilament suture (6–0 polypropylene) | Partial artery rupture | 6 |
| Osteosynthesis of the humerus bone, resection and anastomosis of the brachial artery with/without vein graft | Complete rupture of the artery | 4 |
| Osteosynthesis of the humerus bone, using of Fogarty’s catheter to release the spasm | Arterial spasm in a segment of the artery | 3 |
| All | 35 |
Fig. 4Adventitial hematoma formation together with brachial arterial spasm
Fig. 5Using of Fogarty’s catheter in brachial artery thrombus evacuation
Fig. 6Isolated brachial artery contusion