INTRODUCTION: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment option in patients with treatment-resistant arterial hypertension. A subset of recently published randomized and non-randomized trials indicates that RDN leads to sustained lowering of blood pressure (BP) under controlled study conditions. However, registry data that allow evaluation of safety and efficacy in a real-world setting are largely missing. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients with treatment-resistant hypertension underwent RDN with the radiofrequency-based Symplicity™ catheter. As part of our prospective registry, treatment efficacy and safety were monitored after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: At 6 months follow-up, office systolic BP significantly improved by 19 + 23 mmHg as compared to baseline, while diastolic BP values reduced by 6 + 13 mmHg (p < 0.05). One year after RDN, office BP levels further improved (26 + 25 mmHg in systolic BP and 9 + 13 mmHg in diastolic BP, respectively), even though 19 patients had reduced the number and/or dosage of antihypertensive agents. The response rate, defined as reduction of office systolic BP of ≥ 10 mmHg, was 73% after 6 months. Baseline BP was the only significant predictor of blood pressure response, whereas no correlation was found between the number of ablation points and the individual changes in office blood pressure. Interestingly, patients with challenging renal anatomy profited somewhat less from the procedure than those with "normal" renal anatomy. Procedure related adverse events occurred in three patients (4.7%) and were limited to vascular access complications. CONCLUSIONS: RDN with the Symplicity™ system is safe and effective in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension also in a real-world setting.
INTRODUCTION: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment option in patients with treatment-resistant arterial hypertension. A subset of recently published randomized and non-randomized trials indicates that RDN leads to sustained lowering of blood pressure (BP) under controlled study conditions. However, registry data that allow evaluation of safety and efficacy in a real-world setting are largely missing. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients with treatment-resistant hypertension underwent RDN with the radiofrequency-based Symplicity™ catheter. As part of our prospective registry, treatment efficacy and safety were monitored after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: At 6 months follow-up, office systolic BP significantly improved by 19 + 23 mmHg as compared to baseline, while diastolic BP values reduced by 6 + 13 mmHg (p < 0.05). One year after RDN, office BP levels further improved (26 + 25 mmHg in systolic BP and 9 + 13 mmHg in diastolic BP, respectively), even though 19 patients had reduced the number and/or dosage of antihypertensive agents. The response rate, defined as reduction of office systolic BP of ≥ 10 mmHg, was 73% after 6 months. Baseline BP was the only significant predictor of blood pressure response, whereas no correlation was found between the number of ablation points and the individual changes in office blood pressure. Interestingly, patients with challenging renal anatomy profited somewhat less from the procedure than those with "normal" renal anatomy. Procedure related adverse events occurred in three patients (4.7%) and were limited to vascular access complications. CONCLUSIONS: RDN with the Symplicity™ system is safe and effective in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension also in a real-world setting.
Authors: Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert J Adams; Todd M Brown; Mercedes Carnethon; Shifan Dai; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Cathleen Gillespie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; P Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary M McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Véronique L Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan D Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Benjamin Kaltenbach; Jennifer Franke; Stefan C Bertog; Daniel H Steinberg; Ilona Hofmann; Horst Sievert Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 15-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Katharina Wolf-Maier; Richard S Cooper; Holly Kramer; José R Banegas; Simona Giampaoli; Michel R Joffres; Neil Poulter; Paola Primatesta; Birgitta Stegmayr; Michael Thamm Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-11-24 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Felix Mahfoud; Christian Ukena; Roland E Schmieder; Bodo Cremers; Lars C Rump; Oliver Vonend; Joachim Weil; Martin Schmidt; Uta C Hoppe; Thomas Zeller; Axel Bauer; Christian Ott; Erwin Blessing; Paul A Sobotka; Henry Krum; Markus Schlaich; Murray Esler; Michael Böhm Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul A Sobotka; Felix Mahfoud; Markus P Schlaich; Uta C Hoppe; Michael Böhm; Henry Krum Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-06-19 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Oliver Dörr; Sebastian Ewen; Christoph Liebetrau; Helge Möllmann; Luise Gaede; Dominik Linz; Mathias Hohl; Christian Troidl; Timm Bauer; Michael Böhm; Christian Hamm; Felix Mahfoud; Holger Nef Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Eberhard P Scholz; Philip Raake; Dierk Thomas; Britta Vogel; Hugo A Katus; Erwin Blessing Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Christian Ott; Joanna M Harazny; Axel Schmid; Tilmann Ditting; Roland Veelken; Marek Bladowski; Georg Michelson; Michael Uder; Roland E Schmieder Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Karen Sliwa; Dike Ojji; Katrin Bachelier; Michael Böhm; Albertino Damasceno; Simon Stewart Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: B-K Kim; M Böhm; F Mahfoud; G Mancia; S Park; M-K Hong; H-S Kim; S-J Park; C G Park; K B Seung; H-C Gwon; D-J Choi; T H Ahn; C J Kim; H M Kwon; M Esler; Y S Jang Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.012