Literature DB >> 24126261

Hysteroscopic sterilization: 10-year retrospective analysis of worldwide pregnancy reports.

M G Munro1, J E Nichols2, B Levy3, M P H Vleugels4, S Veersema5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that might contribute to pregnancies reported after hysteroscopic sterilization worldwide.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of commercial data compiled from the MAUDE database, medical literature, and manufacturer reports received during commercial distribution of hysteroscopic sterilization micro-inserts from 2001 through 2010 (Canadian Taskforce classification III descriptive study).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From 2001 through 2010, 497 305 hysteroscopic sterilization kits were distributed worldwide, and 748 pregnancies were reported, i.e., 0.15% of the estimated user population based on the number of distributed kits. The data were sufficient to enable analysis of 508 pregnancies for potential contributing factors and showed most to be associated with patient or physician noncompliance (n = 264) or misinterpreted confirmation tests (n = 212). Conceptions deemed to have occurred within 2 weeks of the procedure and therefore too early for detection were identified in 32 cases.
CONCLUSION: Although there are limitations to the dataset and the study design is retrospective, it represents the largest body of cumulative hysteroscopic sterilization data available to date. Of the 748 pregnancies reported, it is apparent that some might have been prevented with greater patient and clinician attention to interim contraceptive use and counseling and with more rigorous evaluation and informed interpretation of the procedure confirmation tests. Although the estimated pregnancy rate based on such a dataset is likely an underestimation, it does suggest that the evaluable field performance of hysteroscopic sterilization micro-inserts is consistent with the labeled age-adjusted effectiveness of 99.74% at 5 years.
Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Essure; Female sterilization; Hysteroscopic sterilization; Permanent birth control

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24126261     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

Review 1.  Update on permanent contraception options for women.

Authors:  Eva Patil; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Improving Rates of Post-Essure Hysterosalpingography in an Urban Population Using Electronic Tracking Reminders.

Authors:  Yu-Han Virginia Hu; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Contraception and Pregnancy Planning in Women With Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Kathryn J Lindley; Shayna N Conner; Alison G Cahill; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11

4.  Temporal trend in the use of hysteroscopic vs laparoscopic sterilization and the characteristics of commercially insured and Medicaid-insured females in the US who have had the procedures.

Authors:  Patricia I Carney; Jay Lin; Fang Xia; Amy Law
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-05-10

5.  Initial experience with hysteroscopic tubal occlusion (Essure®).

Authors:  Daniella De Batista Depes; Ana Maria Gomes Pereira; Umberto Gazi Lippi; João Alfredo Martins; Reginaldo Guedes Coelho Lopes
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.