| Literature DB >> 24125910 |
Katerina Fliegerova1, Ilma Tapio2, Aurelie Bonin3, Jakub Mrazek4, Maria Luisa Callegari5, Paolo Bani5, Alireza Bayat6, Johanna Vilkki2, Jan Kopečný4, Kevin J Shingfield6, Frederic Boyer3, Eric Coissac3, Pierre Taberlet3, R John Wallace7.
Abstract
The comparison of the bacterial profile of intracellular (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) isolated from cow rumen content stored under different conditions was conducted. The influence of rumen fluid treatment (cheesecloth squeezed, centrifuged, filtered), storage temperature (RT, -80 °C) and cryoprotectants (PBS-glycerol, ethanol) on quality and quantity parameters of extracted DNA was evaluated by bacterial DGGE analysis, real-time PCR quantification and metabarcoding approach using high-throughput sequencing. Samples clustered according to the type of extracted DNA due to considerable differences between iDNA and eDNA bacterial profiles, while storage temperature and cryoprotectants additives had little effect on sample clustering. The numbers of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were lower (P < 0.01) in eDNA samples. The qPCR indicated significantly higher amount of Firmicutes in iDNA sample frozen with glycerol (P < 0.01). Deep sequencing analysis of iDNA samples revealed the prevalence of Bacteroidetes and similarity of samples frozen with and without cryoprotectants, which differed from sample stored with ethanol at room temperature. Centrifugation and consequent filtration of rumen fluid subjected to the eDNA isolation procedure considerably changed the ratio of molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Intracellular DNA extraction using bead-beating method from cheesecloth sieved rumen content mixed with PBS-glycerol and stored at -80 °C was found as the optimal method to study ruminal bacterial profile.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial diversity; Bacteroidetes; Extracellular DNA; Firmicutes; Intracellular DNA; Metabarcoding; PCR-DGGE; Q-PCR; Rumen fluid; Storage conditions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24125910 DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.09.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anaerobe ISSN: 1075-9964 Impact factor: 3.331