Literature DB >> 24125910

Effect of DNA extraction and sample preservation method on rumen bacterial population.

Katerina Fliegerova1, Ilma Tapio2, Aurelie Bonin3, Jakub Mrazek4, Maria Luisa Callegari5, Paolo Bani5, Alireza Bayat6, Johanna Vilkki2, Jan Kopečný4, Kevin J Shingfield6, Frederic Boyer3, Eric Coissac3, Pierre Taberlet3, R John Wallace7.   

Abstract

The comparison of the bacterial profile of intracellular (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) isolated from cow rumen content stored under different conditions was conducted. The influence of rumen fluid treatment (cheesecloth squeezed, centrifuged, filtered), storage temperature (RT, -80 °C) and cryoprotectants (PBS-glycerol, ethanol) on quality and quantity parameters of extracted DNA was evaluated by bacterial DGGE analysis, real-time PCR quantification and metabarcoding approach using high-throughput sequencing. Samples clustered according to the type of extracted DNA due to considerable differences between iDNA and eDNA bacterial profiles, while storage temperature and cryoprotectants additives had little effect on sample clustering. The numbers of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were lower (P < 0.01) in eDNA samples. The qPCR indicated significantly higher amount of Firmicutes in iDNA sample frozen with glycerol (P < 0.01). Deep sequencing analysis of iDNA samples revealed the prevalence of Bacteroidetes and similarity of samples frozen with and without cryoprotectants, which differed from sample stored with ethanol at room temperature. Centrifugation and consequent filtration of rumen fluid subjected to the eDNA isolation procedure considerably changed the ratio of molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Intracellular DNA extraction using bead-beating method from cheesecloth sieved rumen content mixed with PBS-glycerol and stored at -80 °C was found as the optimal method to study ruminal bacterial profile.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial diversity; Bacteroidetes; Extracellular DNA; Firmicutes; Intracellular DNA; Metabarcoding; PCR-DGGE; Q-PCR; Rumen fluid; Storage conditions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24125910     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  20 in total

1.  PCR-DGGE Analysis on Microbial Community Structure of Rural Household Biogas Digesters in Qinghai Plateau.

Authors:  Rui Han; Yongze Yuan; Qianwen Cao; Quanhui Li; Laisheng Chen; Derui Zhu; Deli Liu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Induction of Subacute Ruminal Acidosis Affects the Ruminal Microbiome and Epithelium.

Authors:  Joshua C McCann; Shaoyu Luan; Felipe C Cardoso; Hooman Derakhshani; Ehsan Khafipour; Juan J Loor
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Comparison of rumen bacteria distribution in original rumen digesta, rumen liquid and solid fractions in lactating Holstein cows.

Authors:  Shoukun Ji; Hongtao Zhang; Hui Yan; Arash Azarfar; Haitao Shi; Gibson Alugongo; Shengli Li; Zhijun Cao; Yajing Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  The Effect of DNA Extraction Methods on Observed Microbial Communities from Fibrous and Liquid Rumen Fractions of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Jueeli D Vaidya; Bartholomeus van den Bogert; Joan E Edwards; Jos Boekhorst; Sanne van Gastelen; Edoardo Saccenti; Caroline M Plugge; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Social odours covary with bacterial community in the anal secretions of wild meerkats.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Staffan Jacob; Lydia K Greene; George R Dubay; Christine M Drea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Studies on bacterial community composition are affected by the time and storage method of the rumen content.

Authors:  Yury Tatiana Granja-Salcedo; Ricardo Andrés Ramirez-Uscategui; Elwi Guillermo Machado; Juliana Duarte Messana; Luciano Takeshi Kishi; Ana Veronica Lino Dias; Telma Teresinha Berchielli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of preservation method on canine (Canis lupus familiaris) fecal microbiota.

Authors:  Katti R Horng; Holly H Ganz; Jonathan A Eisen; Stanley L Marks
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Association of residual feed intake with abundance of ruminal bacteria and biopolymer hydrolyzing enzyme activities during the peripartal period and early lactation in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Ahmed A Elolimy; José M Arroyo; Fernanda Batistel; Michael A Iakiviak; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-14

9.  Preservation of microbial communities enriched on lignocellulose under thermophilic and high-solid conditions.

Authors:  Chaowei Yu; Amitha P Reddy; Christopher W Simmons; Blake A Simmons; Steven W Singer; Jean S VanderGheynst
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Rumen-protected methionine during the peripartal period in dairy cows and its effects on abundance of major species of ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  Mohamed K Abdelmegeid; Ahmed A Elolimy; Zheng Zhou; Vincenzo Lopreiato; Joshua C McCann; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.