Literature DB >> 24124966

Average daily risk range as a measure for clinical research and routine care.

Susana R Patton1, Mark A Clements.   

Abstract

There is emerging evidence suggesting that glycemic variability may relate to risk for diabetes-related complications. This article provides a description of average daily risk range (ADRR), a diabetes-specific measure of risk for hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and provides a summary of research using ADRR and clinical applications of ADRR. Average daily risk range is a variability metric that is based on "risk" values obtained from glucose levels that are mathematically transformed to give equal weight to hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic excursions. It can be calculated using self-monitoring of blood glucose or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data. The ADRR is scored based on risk categories: low risk, 0-19; moderate risk, 20-40; and high risk, 40 and above. Research using ADRR has found it to be a reliable predictor of extreme blood glucose values regardless of diabetes type and patients' age. Moreover, in treatment studies, ADRR presents as a very conservative measure of variability. Clinically, ADRR can provide meaningful data related to patients' risk for hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia that is not available from glycated hemoglobin values. Average daily risk range scores may also help clinicians to identify patients who may be overtreating blood glucose levels, leading to very high or low values. To expand the utility of ADRR, future research should examine the validity of existing risk cutoff scores for pediatric patients, determine if ADRR cutoff scores need to be modified for CGM data, and investigate whether patients' ADRR scores also relate to the development of long-term complications, including retinopathy and microalbuminuria.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24124966      PMCID: PMC3876383          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  29 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Responses to continuous glucose monitoring in subjects with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily injections.

Authors:  David Rodbard; Lois Jovanovic; Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Hypoglycemia risk and glucose variability indices derived from routine self-monitoring of blood glucose are related to laboratory measures of insulin sensitivity and epinephrine counterregulation.

Authors:  Achilleas N Pitsillides; Stacey M Anderson; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Normal reference range for mean tissue glucose and glycemic variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring for subjects without diabetes in different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Nathan R Hill; Nick S Oliver; Pratik Choudhary; Jonathan C Levy; Peter Hindmarsh; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Assessment of glycemic lability and severity of hypoglycemia in Korean patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Soo Kyoung Kim; Soon Beom Kwon; Kun Ho Yoon; Kyu Jeung Ahn; Jun Goo Kang; Hye Seung Jung; Eun Seok Kang; Jae Hyeon Kim; Kwang-Won Kim
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.349

6.  Intermittent high glucose promotes expression of proinflammatory cytokines in monocytes.

Authors:  Yang Li-Bo; Qi Wen-Bo; Lv Xiao-Hong; Feng You-Lun; Zhang Tie
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.575

7.  Improved quality of glycemic control and reduced glycemic variability with use of continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  David Rodbard; Timothy Bailey; Lois Jovanovic; Howard Zisser; Roy Kaplan; Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Effects of intermittent high glucose on oxidative stress in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Qin-Min Ge; Yan Dong; Hong-Mei Zhang; Qing Su
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Reduced daily risk of glycemic variability: comparison of exenatide with insulin glargine.

Authors:  Anthony L McCall; Daniel J Cox; Robert Brodows; John Crean; Don Johns; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Intermittent high glucose enhances proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells by upregulating osteopontin.

Authors:  Jiazhong Sun; Yancheng Xu; Zhe Dai; Yanlei Sun
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 4.102

View more
  10 in total

1.  Measures of Risk and Glucose Variability in Adults Versus Youths.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Metrics Beyond Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetes Management: Time in Range, Hypoglycemia, and Other Parameters.

Authors:  Lorena Alarcon-Casas Wright; Irl B Hirsch
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  Utility of different glycemic control metrics for optimizing management of diabetes.

Authors:  Klaus-Dieter Kohnert; Peter Heinke; Lutz Vogt; Eckhard Salzsieder
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-02-15

4.  Sensitivity of Traditional and Risk-Based Glycemic Variability Measures to the Effect of Glucose-Lowering Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Boris Kovatchev; Guillermo Umpierrez; Andres DiGenio; Rong Zhou; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 5.  Metrics for glycaemic control - from HbA1c to continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  A Review of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Composite Metrics for Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Michelle Nguyen; Julia Han; Elias K Spanakis; Boris P Kovatchev; David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Cell based metabolic barriers to glucose diffusion: macrophages and continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Jackman T Frailey; Yi Qiao; Omar Antar; Donald L Kreutzer
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Evaluation of the Average Daily Risk Range as a Measure of Glycemic Variability in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Susana R Patton; Stephen A DeLurgio; Mark A Clements
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Effects of Variability in Glycemic Indices on Longevity in Chinese Centenarians.

Authors:  Sheng-Han Ji; Chen Dong; Rou Chen; Chen-Chen Shen; Jing Xiao; Yun-Juan Gu; Jian-Lin Gao
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-08

10.  Influence of MRI-based boundary conditions on type B aortic dissection simulations in false lumen with or without abdominal aorta involvement.

Authors:  Dongting Liu; Xuan Wang; Dongliang Zhao; Zhonghua Sun; Jumatay Biekan; Zhaoying Wen; Lei Xu; Jiayi Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.755

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.