Sigrun Vehling1, Anja Mehnert. 1. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Demoralization is a syndrome of existential distress that occurs in a substantial minority of cancer patients and is associated with a higher number of physical problems. Loss of dignity refers to a range of specific existential concerns. This study examines whether the association between number of physical problems and demoralization is mediated by loss of dignity. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined N = 112 inpatients with mixed tumor sites at early and advanced disease stages using the following standardized self-report questionnaires: Physical problems list of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT), Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), Demoralization Scale (DS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Illness-Specific Social Support Scale Short Version-8 (ISSS-8). The mediation hypothesis was tested by multiple regression analyses controlling for age, gender, curative versus palliative treatment phase, and social support. RESULTS: Patients reported M = .7 (SD = 6.0) dignity-related problems; 20% showed moderate to severe demoralization. Loss of dignity significantly mediated 81% of the effect of the number of physical problems on demoralization (Sobel zs = 4.4, p < .001). Testing the reverse direction, we found that demoralization mediated only 53% of the association between physical problems and loss of dignity (zs = 3.7, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: By supporting the mediation hypothesis, our results indicate that loss of dignity partially explains the association between physical problems and demoralization. Early recognition of dignity-related existential concerns and interventions to enhance the sense of dignity may prevent demoralization in patients with cancer. Results provide a conceptual link between existential concerns (loss of dignity) and existential distress (demoralization) as two approaches to existential suffering in patients with cancer.
BACKGROUND: Demoralization is a syndrome of existential distress that occurs in a substantial minority of cancerpatients and is associated with a higher number of physical problems. Loss of dignity refers to a range of specific existential concerns. This study examines whether the association between number of physical problems and demoralization is mediated by loss of dignity. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined N = 112 inpatients with mixed tumor sites at early and advanced disease stages using the following standardized self-report questionnaires: Physical problems list of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT), Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), Demoralization Scale (DS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Illness-Specific Social Support Scale Short Version-8 (ISSS-8). The mediation hypothesis was tested by multiple regression analyses controlling for age, gender, curative versus palliative treatment phase, and social support. RESULTS:Patients reported M = .7 (SD = 6.0) dignity-related problems; 20% showed moderate to severe demoralization. Loss of dignity significantly mediated 81% of the effect of the number of physical problems on demoralization (Sobel zs = 4.4, p < .001). Testing the reverse direction, we found that demoralization mediated only 53% of the association between physical problems and loss of dignity (zs = 3.7, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: By supporting the mediation hypothesis, our results indicate that loss of dignity partially explains the association between physical problems and demoralization. Early recognition of dignity-related existential concerns and interventions to enhance the sense of dignity may prevent demoralization in patients with cancer. Results provide a conceptual link between existential concerns (loss of dignity) and existential distress (demoralization) as two approaches to existential suffering in patients with cancer.
Authors: Andrew S Epstein; Anjali V Desai; Camila Bernal; Danielle Romano; Peter J Wan; Molly Okpako; Kelly Anderson; Kimberly Chow; Dana Kramer; Claudia Calderon; Virginia V Klimek; Robin Rawlins-Duell; Diane L Reidy; Jessica I Goldberg; Elizabeth Cruz; Judith E Nelson Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Keith Zi Yuan Chua; Elaine Li Ying Quah; Yun Xue Lim; Chloe Keyi Goh; Jieyu Lim; Darius Wei Jun Wan; Simone Meiqi Ong; Chi Sum Chong; Kennan Zhi Guang Yeo; Laura Shih Hui Goh; Ray Meng See; Alexia Sze Inn Lee; Yun Ting Ong; Min Chiam; Eng Koon Ong; Jamie Xuelian Zhou; Crystal Lim; Simon Yew Kuang Ong; Lalit Krishna Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 3.113
Authors: R Philipp; A Mehnert; C Lehmann; K Oechsle; C Bokemeyer; A Krüll; S Vehling Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Daniel L Hall; Christina M Luberto; Lisa L Philpotts; Rhayun Song; Elyse R Park; Gloria Y Yeh Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Harvey Max Chochinov; Wendy Johnston; Susan E McClement; Thomas F Hack; Brenden Dufault; Murray Enns; Genevieve Thompson; Mike Harlos; Ronald W Damant; Clare D Ramsey; Sara Davison; James Zacharias; Doris Milke; David Strang; Heather J Campbell-Enns; Maia S Kredentser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240