Literature DB >> 24123189

Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers.

Caroline S Lai1, Valerie G A Suter2, Christos Katsaros1, Michael M Bornstein3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic value of panoramic views (2D) of patients with impacted maxillary canines by a group of trained orthodontists and oral surgeons, and to quantify the subjective need and reasons for further three-dimensional (3D) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprises 60 patients with panoramic radiographs (2D) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (3D), and a total of 72 impacted canines. Data from a standardized questionnaire were compared within (intragroup) and between (intergroup) a group of orthodontists and oral surgeons to assess possible correlations and differences. Furthermore, the questionnaire data were compared with the findings from the CBCT scans to estimate the correlation within and between the two specialties. Finally, the need and reasons for further 3D imaging was analysed for both groups.
RESULTS: When comparing questionnaire data with the analysis of the respective CBCT scans, orthodontists showed probability (Pr) values ranging from 0.443 to 0.943. Oral surgeons exhibited Pr values from 0.191 to 0.946. Statistically significant differences were found for the labiopalatal location of the impacted maxillary canine (P = 0.04), indicating a higher correlation in the orthodontist group. The most frequent reason mentioned for the further need of 3D analysis was the labiopalatal location of the impacted canines. Oral surgeons were more in favour of performing further 3D imaging (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontists were more likely to diagnose the exact labiopalatal position of impacted maxillary canines when using panoramic views only. Generally, oral surgeons more often indicated the need for further 3D imaging.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24123189     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjt074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement.

Authors:  Anne Caroline Oenning; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ruben Pauwels; Andreas Stratis; Mihaela Hedesiu; Benjamin Salmon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-11-15

2.  Cone-beam computed tomography or conventional radiography for localising of maxillary impacted canines?

Authors:  Niloufar Amintavakoli; Silvia Spivakovsky
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2018-03-23

3.  The Relationship between Dental Follicle Width and Maxillary Impacted Canines' Descriptive and Resorptive Features Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  İlhan Metin Dağsuyu; Rıdvan Okşayan; Fatih Kahraman; Mehmet Aydın; İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar; Mehmet Uğurlu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Do we need CBCTs for sufficient diagnostics?-dentist-related factors.

Authors:  Josipa Radic; Raphael Patcas; Bernd Stadlinger; Daniel Wiedemeier; Martin Rücker; Barbara Giacomelli-Hiestand
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-11-16

5.  Orthodontic radiology: development of a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Aldin Kapetanović; Barbara C M Oosterkamp; Antoon A Lamberts; Jan G J H Schols
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Three-dimensional position of impacted maxillary canines: Prevalence, associated pathology and introduction to a new classification system.

Authors:  Koenraad Grisar; Frederik Piccart; Ali S Al-Rimawi; Isabela Basso; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2018-12-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.