Literature DB >> 24122951

Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.

Salman Shahid1, Peng Wen, Tony Ahfock.   

Abstract

The focus of this study is to estimate the contribution of regional anisotropic conductivity on the spatial distribution of an induced electric field across gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and subcortical regions under transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The assessment was conducted using a passive high-resolution finite element head model with inhomogeneous and variable anisotropic conductivities derived from the diffusion tensor data. Electric field distribution was evaluated across different cortical as well as subcortical regions under four bicephalic electrode configurations. Results indicate that regional tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy cause the pattern of induced fields to vary in orientation and strength when compared to the isotropic scenario. Different electrode montages resulted in distinct distribution patterns with noticeable variations in field strengths. The effect of anisotropy is highly montage dependent and directional conductivity has a more profound effect in defining the strength of the induced field. The inclusion of anisotropy in the GM and subcortical regions has a significant effect on the strength and spatial distribution of the induced electric field. Under the (C3-Fp2) montage, the inclusion of GM and subcortical anisotropy increased the average percentage difference in the electric field strength of brain from 5% to 34% (WM anisotropy only). In terms of patterns distribution, the topographic errors increased from 9.9% to 40% (WM anisotropy only) across the brain.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  anisotropy; tissue electrical conductivity; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24122951     DOI: 10.1002/bem.21814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  11 in total

1.  Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Benjamin Schwartz; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  The electric field distribution in the brain during TTFields therapy and its dependence on tissue dielectric properties and anatomy: a computational study.

Authors:  Cornelia Wenger; Ricardo Salvador; Peter J Basser; Pedro C Miranda
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.

Authors:  Lucia M Li; Kazumasa Uehara; Takashi Hanakawa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  Computational Study of Subdural Cortical Stimulation: Effects of Simulating Anisotropic Conductivity on Activation of Cortical Neurons.

Authors:  Hyeon Seo; Donghyeon Kim; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: Probing Intracortical Circuits and Improving Cognition in the Aging Brain.

Authors:  Joyce Gomes-Osman; Aprinda Indahlastari; Peter J Fried; Danylo L F Cabral; Jordyn Rice; Nicole R Nissim; Serkan Aksu; Molly E McLaren; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in behavioral and food addiction: a systematic review of efficacy, technical, and methodological issues.

Authors:  Anne Sauvaget; Benoît Trojak; Samuel Bulteau; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Fernando Fernández-Aranda; Ines Wolz; José M Menchón; Sophia Achab; Jean-Marie Vanelle; Marie Grall-Bronnec
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex enhances distinct aspects of visual working memory.

Authors:  Klaartje Heinen; Laura Sagliano; Michela Candini; Masud Husain; Marinella Cappelletti; Nahid Zokaei
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity.

Authors:  Lucia M Li; Ines R Violante; Rob Leech; Adam Hampshire; Alexander Opitz; David McArthur; David W Carmichael; David J Sharp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Michael A Nitsche; Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida; Ángeles Salas Sánchez; Raquel Martín Riquel; Rafael Tomás Andújar Barroso; José Ramón Alameda Bailén; Jesús Carlos García Palomeque; Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.