Literature DB >> 24122914

Avoidance and reproduction tests with the predatory mite Hypoaspis aculeifer: effects of different chemical substances.

Olugbenga J Owojori1, Karolina Waszak, Joerg Roembke.   

Abstract

Few toxicity data exist in the literature on the toxicity of chemicals to the predatory mite Hypoaspis aculeifer, but no information is available on its avoidance response. To assess the relevance of the avoidance behavior of H. aculeifer and the relative sensitivity of the mite in comparison with other invertebrates, avoidance and reproduction tests were conducted with 7 chemicals using standardized guidelines. The chemicals (deltamethrin, chloropyrifos, dimethoate, Cu, NaCl, phenanthrene, and boric acid) were selected so as to cover varying chemical classes. For all 3 pesticides tested, avoidance response showed lower sensitivity than reproduction and survival (avoidance median effective concentration [EC50] > reproduction EC50/median lethal concentration [LC50] values). However, for Cu, NaCl, and phenanthrene, the avoidance response showed similar sensitivity as reproduction (avoidance EC50 ≤ reproduction EC50 values), whereas for boric acid, similar sensitivity as survival (avoidance EC50 ≤ LC50 values). Although the mite H. aculeifer appears less sensitive to some of the chemicals tested than most other soil invertebrates, its status as the only predator among organisms for which standardized tests are available affirms its inclusion in routine ecotoxicity assessment. The results of the avoidance test with H. aculeifer suggest its potential usefulness as a rapid screening test for risk assessment purposes.
© 2013 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avoidance; Laboratory; Metals; Organic chemicals; Pesticides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24122914     DOI: 10.1002/etc.2421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  7 in total

Review 1.  The use of soil mites in ecotoxicology: a review.

Authors:  Pierre Huguier; Nicolas Manier; Olugbenga John Owojori; Pascale Bauda; Pascal Pandard; Jörg Römbke
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Salinization effects on coastal ecosystems: a terrestrial model ecosystem approach.

Authors:  C S Pereira; I Lopes; I Abrantes; J P Sousa; S Chelinho
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Ecotoxicity of boric acid in standard laboratory tests with plants and soil organisms.

Authors:  Juliska Princz; Leonie Becker; Adam Scheffczyk; Gladys Stephenson; Rick Scroggins; Thomas Moser; Jörg Römbke
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Boric acid as reference substance for ecotoxicity tests in tropical artificial soil.

Authors:  Júlia Carina Niemeyer; Letícia Scopel Camargo Carniel; Fernanda Benedet de Santo; Mayrine Silva; Osmar Klauberg-Filho
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Non-avoidance behaviour in enchytraeids to boric acid is related to the GABAergic mechanism.

Authors:  Rita C Bicho; Susana I L Gomes; Amadeu M V M Soares; Mónica J B Amorim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Age-related environmental gradients influence invertebrate distribution in the Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica.

Authors:  Paul Czechowski; Duanne White; Laurence Clarke; Alan McKay; Alan Cooper; Mark I Stevens
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Quantifying pesticide deposits and spray patterns at micro-scales on apple (Malus domesticus) leaves with a view to arthropod exposure.

Authors:  Joanna T Witton; Matthew D Pickering; Tania Alvarez; Melissa Reed; Gabriel Weyman; Mark E Hodson; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.845

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.