Literature DB >> 24122890

Significance of aortic valve calcification in patients with low-gradient low-flow aortic stenosis.

Olcay Aksoy1, Akin Cam, Shikhar Agarwal, Mobolaji Ige, Rayan Yousefzai, Dhssraj Singh, Brian P Griffin, Paul Schoenhagen, Samir R Kapadia, Murat E Tuzcu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and impaired left ventricular function remains challenging. Aortic valve calcium (AVC) scoring with computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy has been proposed as means of diagnosing and predicting outcomes in patients with severe AS. HYPOTHESIS: Severity of aortic valve calcification correlates with the diagnosis of true severe AS and outcomes in patients with low-gradient low-flow AS.
METHODS: Echocardiography and CT database records from January 1, 2000 to September 26, 2009 were reviewed. Patients with aortic valve area (AVA)<1.0 cm2 who had ejection fraction (EF)≤25% and mean valvular gradient≤25 mmHg with concurrent noncontrast CT scans were included. AVC was evaluated using CT and fluoroscopy. Mortality and aortic valve replacement (AVR) were established using the Social Security Death Index and medical records. The role of surgery in outcomes was evaluated.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients who met the above criteria were included. Mean age was 75.1±9.6 years, and 15 patients were female. Mean EF was 21%±4.6% with AVA of 0.7±0.1 cm2. The peak and mean gradients were 35.5±10.6 and 19.0±5.1 mmHg, respectively. Median aortic valve calcium score was 2027 Agatston units. Mean follow-up was 908 days. Patients with calcium scores above the median value were found to have increased mortality (P=0.02). The benefit of surgery on survival was more pronounced in patients with higher valvular scores (P=0.001). Fluoroscopy scoring led to similar findings, where increased AVC predicted worse outcomes (P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low-gradient low-flow AS, higher valvular calcium score predicts worse long-term mortality. AVR is associated with improved survival in patients with higher valve scores.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24122890      PMCID: PMC6649593          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  13 in total

Review 1.  Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Part 1--Molecular Pathogenetic Aspects, Hemodynamics, and Adaptive Feedbacks.

Authors:  Ares Pasipoularides
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Association of Time Between Left Ventricular and Aortic Systolic Pressure Peaks With Severity of Aortic Stenosis and Calcification of Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Kimi Sato; Arnav Kumar; Yash Jobanputra; Jorge Betancor; Mohamed Halane; Robin George; Vivek Menon; Amar Krishnaswamy; E Murat Tuzcu; Serge Harb; Wael A Jaber; Stephanie Mick; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Low gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Katie M Doucet; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-05

4.  Calcification Characteristics of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim; Cathérine Gebhard; Thomas Frauenfelder; Felix C Tanner; Fabian Nietlispach; Francesco Maisano; Volkmar Falk; Thomas F Lüscher; Willibald Maier; Ronald K Binder
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 1.866

5.  Vascular Calcification and Stone Disease: A New Look towards the Mechanism.

Authors:  Allen J Yiu; Daniel Callaghan; Razia Sultana; Bidhan C Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2015

6.  Quantification of Calcium Amount in a New Experimental Model: A Comparison between Ultrasound and Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Kris Gillis; Gezim Bala; Bram Roosens; Isabel Remory; Sophie Hernot; Steven Droogmans; Bernard Cosyns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: a Developmental Biology Perspective.

Authors:  Punashi Dutta; Joy Lincoln
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Russell J Everett; David E Newby; Andrew Jabbour; Zahi A Fayad; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2016-06-07

Review 9.  Aortic Stenosis, a Left Ventricular Disease: Insights from Advanced Imaging.

Authors:  Sveeta Badiani; Jet van Zalen; Thomas A Treibel; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; James C Moon; Guy Lloyd
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Predicting Disease Progression and Mortality in Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Imaging Biomarkers and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alain Nchimi; John E Dibato; Laurent Davin; Laurent Schoysman; Cécile Oury; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.