Literature DB >> 24122001

MR versus MR arthrography in detection of supraspinatus tendon tears in patients without previous shoulder surgery.

Thomas Magee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report the prevalence of supraspinatus tendon tears seen on MR arthrography that are not seen on conventional MR exam in the same patient population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 consecutive conventional shoulder MR and MR arthrography exams performed on the same patients who went on to arthroscopy were reviewed retrospectively by consensus reading of two musculoskeletal radiologists. Full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears were assessed. None of the patients had previous shoulder surgery.
RESULTS: There were 113 full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears seen on conventional MR exam while there were 119 full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears seen on MR arthrography. The six additional full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears seen on MR arthrography but not seen on conventional MR exam were confirmed at arthroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Some full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears are not seen on conventional MR exam but are seen on MR arthrography. This is most likely due to fibrosis at the supraspinatus tendon tear site simulating an intact tendon on conventional MR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24122001     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1745-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Rotator cuff tears: prospective comparison of MR imaging with arthrography, sonography, and surgery.

Authors:  D L Burk; D Karasick; A B Kurtz; D G Mitchell; M D Rifkin; C L Miller; D W Levy; J M Fenlin; A R Bartolozzi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Sensitivity and specificity in detection of labral tears with 3.0-T MRI of the shoulder.

Authors:  Thomas H Magee; David Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon.

Authors:  Thomas Magee; David Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph O de Jesus; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Rotator cuff lesions: signal patterns at MR imaging.

Authors:  M Rafii; H Firooznia; O Sherman; J Minkoff; J Weinreb; C Golimbu; R Gidumal; R Schinella; K Zaslav
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  3-T MRI of the shoulder: is MR arthrography necessary?

Authors:  Thomas Magee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of MR imaging.

Authors:  M B Zlatkin; J P Iannotti; M C Roberts; J L Esterhai; M K Dalinka; H Y Kressel; J S Schwartz; R E Lenkinski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

  7 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of rotator cuff tears using 3-Tesla MRI versus 3-Tesla MRA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ciaran McGarvey; Ziad Harb; Christian Smith; Russell Houghton; Steven Corbett; Adil Ajuied
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Utility of pre- and post-MR arthrogram imaging of the shoulder: effect on patient care.

Authors:  Thomas Magee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  [The gymnastics shoulder].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; R Doyscher; H-P Boschert; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Jinlei Dong; Wun-Jer Shen; Qinglin Kang; Dongsheng Zhou; Fei Xiong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-05

5.  Imaging of the post-operative shoulder: does injection of iodinated contrast in addition to MR contrast during arthrography improve diagnostic accuracy and patient throughput?

Authors:  Thomas Magee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Comparison of magnetic resonance arthrography with arthroscopy for imaging of shoulder injuries: retrospective study.

Authors:  R Saqib; J Harris; L Funk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Overhead Athletes.

Authors:  Suk-Hwan Jang
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2019-12-01

8.  Comparison of MRI and MRA for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Xiangyun Cheng; Jinlei Dong; Dongsheng Zhou; Shumei Han; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.