PURPOSE: Generally, due to limited availability of official statistics on the topic, little is known about suicide mortality in second-generation migrants. A recent study from Sweden showed that these people could be at a high suicide risk. In a generalised phenomenon, this aspect would represent an important issue in suicide prevention. This paper aims to report the profile of second-generation migrants who died by suicide and the suicide risk differentials of second-generation migrants with other Australians. METHODS: Official suicide data from 2001 to 2008 were linked with State/Territory registries to collect information about the birthplace of the deceased’s parents to differentiate migration status (first, second or third-plus generation). The profile and suicide risk of second-generation migrants were compared with other generations by logistic and Poisson regression. RESULTS: Suicide in second-generation migrants accounted for 811 cases (14.6%). These tended to be represented by younger subjects, more often never married, as compared to the other cases. Second-generation males aged 25–39 years tended to have a higher suicide risk than first generation migrants, but the risk was lower when compared with the third-plus generation. Second-generation migrants aged 60? tended to have a lower suicide risk than first generation migrants. CONCLUSION: In Australia, second-generation migrants are not at a higher suicide risk as compared to first-generation migrants or locals (third-plus-generation). In males aged 25–39, a lower suicide risk was found in second-generations as compared to Australian-born third generation,which may be explained by their more advantageous socioeconomic status and the flexibility and resources rendered by having grown up in a bicultural environment.The higher suicide rates found amongst older first-generation migrants require further examination.
PURPOSE: Generally, due to limited availability of official statistics on the topic, little is known about suicide mortality in second-generation migrants. A recent study from Sweden showed that these people could be at a high suicide risk. In a generalised phenomenon, this aspect would represent an important issue in suicide prevention. This paper aims to report the profile of second-generation migrants who died by suicide and the suicide risk differentials of second-generation migrants with other Australians. METHODS: Official suicide data from 2001 to 2008 were linked with State/Territory registries to collect information about the birthplace of the deceased’s parents to differentiate migration status (first, second or third-plus generation). The profile and suicide risk of second-generation migrants were compared with other generations by logistic and Poisson regression. RESULTS: Suicide in second-generation migrants accounted for 811 cases (14.6%). These tended to be represented by younger subjects, more often never married, as compared to the other cases. Second-generation males aged 25–39 years tended to have a higher suicide risk than first generation migrants, but the risk was lower when compared with the third-plus generation. Second-generation migrants aged 60? tended to have a lower suicide risk than first generation migrants. CONCLUSION: In Australia, second-generation migrants are not at a higher suicide risk as compared to first-generation migrants or locals (third-plus-generation). In males aged 25–39, a lower suicide risk was found in second-generations as compared to Australian-born third generation,which may be explained by their more advantageous socioeconomic status and the flexibility and resources rendered by having grown up in a bicultural environment.The higher suicide rates found amongst older first-generation migrants require further examination.
Authors: Juan B Peña; Peter A Wyman; C Hendricks Brown; Monica M Matthieu; Telva E Olivares; Diana Hartel; Luis H Zayas Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2008-10-15
Authors: Alberto Forte; Federico Trobia; Flavia Gualtieri; Dorian A Lamis; Giuseppe Cardamone; Vincenzo Giallonardo; Andrea Fiorillo; Paolo Girardi; Maurizio Pompili Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-08 Impact factor: 3.390