Literature DB >> 24121658

Process evaluation for a school-based physical activity intervention for 6th- and 7th-grade boys: reach, dose, and fidelity.

Lorraine B Robbins1, Karin Allor Pfeiffer, Stacey M Wesolek, Yun-Jia Lo.   

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the reach, dose, and fidelity of Guys Only Activity for Life (G.O.A.L.), a 7-week pilot intervention conducted from February to March 2011 to increase 6th and 7th grade boys' moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). One middle school was randomly assigned to the G.O.A.L. intervention and another from the same urban school district in the Midwestern U.S. to a comparison condition. Thirty boys, ages 10-14 years, participated in each school. The intervention, guided by the Health Promotion Model (HPM) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), consisted of a 90-min after-school physical activity club 4 days/week and one motivational interviewing session with a registered (school) nurse. Data were gathered via attendance records, club observations, heart rate monitors, audio-taping of motivational interviewing sessions, and surveys. On average boys attended the club 2.11 days/week (SD=.86). A trained independent process evaluator reported that the physical activity club instructors provided the boys with the opportunity for a mean of 25.8 min/day of MVPA. Using a four-point Likert scale (1=disagree a lot; 4=agree a lot), the process evaluator perceived that the club was delivered with high fidelity and adherence to the underlying theories (M=3.48; SD=0.39). Sessions with the nurse lasted an average of 13 min, 29 s. All boys attended. Two trained independent coders indicated that the nurse demonstrated at least beginning proficiency for all tasks associated with motivational interviewing, with the exception of using sufficient open- as opposed to closed-ended questions and reflections compared to questions. Fidelity related to session delivery and adherence to the theories was high (M=3.83; SD=0.19). The process evaluation data indicated that strategies are needed to increase attendance and boys' MVPA during the club time.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Evaluation; Exercise; Male; School; Sedentary; Urban

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24121658     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  15 in total

1.  Process Evaluation of the Project SHINE Intervention for African American Families: An Integrated Positive Parenting and Peer Monitoring Approach to Health Promotion.

Authors:  Sara M St George; Dawn K Wilson; Tyler McDaniel; Kassandra A Alia
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2016-04-15

2.  Process evaluation of an exercise counseling intervention using motivational interviewing.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Stuart D Katz; Kathleen Sciacca; Deborah A Chyun
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Development of an innovative process evaluation approach for the Families Improving Together (FIT) for weight loss trial in African American adolescents.

Authors:  Kassandra A Alia; Dawn K Wilson; Tyler McDaniel; Sara M St George; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich; Kelsey Smith; VaShawn Heatley; Courtney Wise
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2014-12-31

Review 4.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Hilary Caldwell; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-23

Review 5.  Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.

Authors:  Luke Wolfenden; Nicole K Nathan; Rachel Sutherland; Sze Lin Yoong; Rebecca K Hodder; Rebecca J Wyse; Tessa Delaney; Alice Grady; Alison Fielding; Flora Tzelepis; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Benjamin Parmenter; Peter Butler; John Wiggers; Adrian Bauman; Andrew Milat; Debbie Booth; Christopher M Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-29

6.  Examining reach, dose, and fidelity of the "Girls on the Move" after-school physical activity club: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Lorraine B Robbins; Jiying Ling; Ebru Kilicarslan Toruner; Kelly A Bourne; Karin A Pfeiffer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study.

Authors:  Tania L Griffin; Miranda J Pallan; Joanne L Clarke; Emma R Lancashire; Anna Lyon; Jayne M Parry; Peymane Adab
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Process evaluation of the Bristol girls dance project.

Authors:  S J Sebire; M J Edwards; J M Kesten; T May; K J Banfield; E L Bird; K Tomkinson; P Blair; J E Powell; R Jago
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Process evaluation results of a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study.

Authors:  T L Griffin; J L Clarke; E R Lancashire; M J Pallan; P Adab
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Measuring implementation fidelity of school-based obesity prevention programmes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosanne Schaap; Kathelijne Bessems; René Otten; Stef Kremers; Femke van Nassau
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.