BACKGROUND: Learning research skills should be a goal during undergraduate training of physicians. AIM: To identify Latin American medical students' appraisal on research skills university training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A self-administered survey about experience in research, self-assessment of research skills, quality of training in the area received at the university and that importance of publishing as undergraduate students, was answered by 208 medical students aged 23 ± 3 years (54% male), attending a medical students congress. RESULTS: Seventy percent of respondents pertained to medical students' scientific societies and 34% had published in a scientific journal. Fifty two percent considered as good or very good the training level received at their universities on information retrieval and 45% considered good the training in research methodology. Thirty two percent considered as poor or none the training received in scientific writing and 37% in the publishing process. Eighty nine percent considered student publishing as important and 61% perceived limitations in this matter. CONCLUSIONS: The university training level received by Latin American medical students on research and publication process was evaluated as deficient by these students.
BACKGROUND: Learning research skills should be a goal during undergraduate training of physicians. AIM: To identify Latin American medical students' appraisal on research skills university training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A self-administered survey about experience in research, self-assessment of research skills, quality of training in the area received at the university and that importance of publishing as undergraduate students, was answered by 208 medical students aged 23 ± 3 years (54% male), attending a medical students congress. RESULTS: Seventy percent of respondents pertained to medical students' scientific societies and 34% had published in a scientific journal. Fifty two percent considered as good or very good the training level received at their universities on information retrieval and 45% considered good the training in research methodology. Thirty two percent considered as poor or none the training received in scientific writing and 37% in the publishing process. Eighty nine percent considered student publishing as important and 61% perceived limitations in this matter. CONCLUSIONS: The university training level received by Latin American medical students on research and publication process was evaluated as deficient by these students.
Authors: Alejandro Quiroga-Garza; Andrea N Garza-Cisneros; Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña; Jose F Vilchez-Cavazos; Roberto Montes de-Oca-Luna; Eliud Villarreal-Silva; Santos Guzman-Lopez; Jose G Gonzalez-Gonzalez Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 7.664