Literature DB >> 24121456

A retrospective analysis of early CA19‑9 change in salvage chemotherapy for refractory pancreatic cancer.

Yousuke Nakai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takashi Sasaki, Naminatsu Takahara, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Rie Uchino, Suguru Mizuno, Koji Miyabayashi, Keisuke Yamamoto, Dai Mohri, Hirofumi Kogure, Natsuyo Yamamoto, Kenji Hirano, Hideaki Ijichi, Keisuke Tateishi, Minoru Tada, Kazuhiko Koike.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In salvage chemotherapy for refractory pancreatic cancer, early assessment is important to avoid unnecessary toxicities from ineffective chemotherapy. Early CA19-9 change after the first course as a prognostic factor was evaluated in this setting.
METHODS: Patients receiving salvage chemotherapy were retrospectively studied. CA19-9 was measured prior to and after the first course. Cox regression analysis was performed for prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), using the landmark method defined as a day of CA19-9 measurement after the first course.
RESULTS: A total of 239 salvage regimens were given in 167 patients. Median PFS and OS were 2.7 and 6.1 months, respectively. Median pretreatment CA19-9 was 2,362 U/mL, and median CA19-9 change after the first course was 17.8 % increase. CA19-9 change was associated with tumor response, and PFS was 1.7 versus 3.5 months and OS was 3.9 and 8.6 months in patients with ≥50 % versus <50 % increase. In the multivariate analyses, CA19-9 increase ≥50 % was prognostic of both PFS and OS (HR 2.28 and 2.50, p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: CA19-9 change after the first course was prognostic of PFS and OS in refractory pancreatic cancer. Early discontinuation should be considered given the palliative setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24121456     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-013-2313-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  5 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic options for the management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Maria L Rossi; Azeem A Rehman; Christopher S Gondi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Expression and diagnostic value of HE4 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tianhe Huang; Shi-Wen Jiang; Liangyi Qin; Christopher Senkowski; Christian Lyle; Karen Terry; Steven Brower; Haibin Chen; Wayne Glasgow; Yongchang Wei; Jinping Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The correlation between common postoperative complications and quality of life, serum tumor markers, and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Linlin Sun; Fengqin Xu; Xiajun Xu; Chunmei Liu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 4.  Prognostic value of IGFBP2 in various cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Biao Zhang; Chao-Qun Hong; Yu-Hao Luo; Lai-Feng Wei; Yun Luo; Yu-Hui Peng; Yi-Wei Xu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.711

5.  Who could complete and benefit from the adjuvant chemotherapy regarding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A multivariate-adjusted analysis at the pre-adjuvant chemotherapy timing.

Authors:  Ningzhen Fu; Kai Qin; Jingfeng Li; Jiabin Jin; Yu Jiang; Xiaxing Deng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 4.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.