Literature DB >> 24120829

Epidemiologic profile of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in pregnant women attending prenatal care in a city of southern of Brazil.

Cássia Rejane Kruk1, Otto Henry May Feuerschuette, Sheila Koetker da Silveira, Mayara Cordazo, Alberto Trapani Júnior.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24120829      PMCID: PMC9427333          DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1413-8670            Impact factor:   3.257


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The presence of Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) in the maternal genital tract is known to be responsible for significant neonatal morbidity and mortality rates, but it is usually asymptomatic. Maternal screening during pregnancy through the culture of vaginal and rectal secretions collected between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation allows the introduction of therapeutic interventions in a timely manner, reducing the frequency and severity of early-onset neonatal sepsis.1, 2 Many countries have reduced morbidity and mortality rates from S. agalactiae infection by adopting universal screening at 35–37 weeks of gestation, and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.3, 4, 5 A cross-sectional study was conducted between August and December 2011 to estimate the prevalence of streptococcal colonization in pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy and identify the factors potentially associated with colonization. Participants were recruited among consenting women at 35–37 weeks of gestation, attending antenatal clinics in the city of Tubarão, Brazil. A questionnaire was administered asking about socioeconomic status, and clinical and obstetrical data of current and past pregnancies. It also asked questions related to sexual behavior of pregnant women. Vaginal and anorectal secretion samples were collected, and all culture tests were performed at the same clinical laboratory. A culture method is still considered the gold standard of screening for bacterial colonization, being extremely effective and used by most countries, including the most developed. The data were entered into Epidata version 3.1 and the SPSS software, version 17.0, was used to perform statistical analysis. The study included 118 pregnant women. Findings in this study revealed that about one in four women were colonized with GBS, which is considered a high prevalence.2, 3, 4 Statistically significant differences were found in this study between colonization with GBS and factors such as black skin color, low household income, fever, antibiotic use and leukorrhea during current pregnancy, prolonged labor in a past pregnancy and multiple sexual partners. Although this was a cross-sectional study, these variables could be considered as risk factors associated with high prevalence of GBS colonization. There was no clear association between marital status, education level, and high rates of streptococcal colonization, even though less educated, unmarried pregnant women had a slightly higher prevalence than their counterparts (Table 1).
Table 1

Correlation between GBS culture results, demographic and obstetric characteristics of current pregnancy.

VariablesTotalPositive cultureNegative culturep-Value
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Skin color
 Whites/not black109 (92.4)27 (84.4)82 (95.3)0.046a
 Black9 (7.6)5 (15.6)4 (4.7)



Marital status
 Married/cohabiting112 (94.9)30 (93.7)82 (95.3)0.662b
 Single6 (5.1)2 (6.3)4 (4.7)



Household income
 <2 minimum wages13 (11)8 (25)5 (5.8)0.003a
 >2 minimum wages105 (89)24 (75)81 (94.2)



Education
 College degree36 (30.5)9 (28.1)27 (31.4)0.732a
 Other82 (69.5)23 (71.9)59 (68.6)



Fever (>38° C)
 No109 (92.4)27 (84.4)82 (95.3)0.046a
 Yes9 (7.6)5 (15.6)4 (4.7)



Urinary infection
 No90 (76.3)21 (65.6)69 (80.2)0.191a
 Yes28 (23.7)11 (34.4)17 (19.8)



Use of antibiotics
 No68 (57.6)11 (34.4)57 (66.3)0.02a
 Yes50 (42.4)21 (65.6)29 (33.7)



Vaginal discharge
 No96 (81.4)22 (68.7)74 (86)0.032a
 Yes22 (18.6)10 (31.3)12 (14)



Bleeding
 No114 (96.6)30 (93.7)84 (97.7)0.295a
 Yes4 (3.4)2 (6.3)2 (2.3)

Pearson chi-square, 95% CI.

Fisher's exact test, 95% CI.

Correlation between GBS culture results, demographic and obstetric characteristics of current pregnancy. Pearson chi-square, 95% CI. Fisher's exact test, 95% CI. These findings suggest the need for the physicians to adopt a routine prenatal isolation of the micro-organism in culture tests, since knowledge of the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and the most significant risk factors, is an important step toward the adoption of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, which can significantly reduce the complications resulting from GBS colonization.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010.

Authors:  Jennifer R Verani; Lesley McGee; Stephanie J Schrag
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2010-11-19

2.  Epidemiology of neonatal group B streptococcal disease in the Netherlands before and after introduction of guidelines for prevention.

Authors:  M Trijbels-Smeulders; G A de Jonge; P C M Pasker-de Jong; L J Gerards; A H Adriaanse; R A van Lingen; L A A Kollée
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Group B streptococci colonization in pregnant women: risk factors and evaluation of the vaginal flora.

Authors:  Talita T Rocchetti; Camila Marconi; Vera L M Rall; Vera T M Borges; José E Corrente; Márcia G da Silva
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Genital tract group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women: a South Indian perspective.

Authors:  Vijayan Sharmila; Noyal Mariya Joseph; Thirunavukkarasu Arun Babu; Latha Chaturvedula; Sujatha Sistla
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Prevalence of maternal group B streptococcal colonization and related risk factors in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Alexander S Zusman; Robert S Baltimore; Silvia N S Fonseca
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.949

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in pregnant women from the 18th Health Region of Paraná State.

Authors:  Simone Cristina Castanho Sabaini de Melo; Aline Balandis Costa; Flávia Teixeira Ribeiro da Silva; Natália Maria Maciel Guerra Silva; Cristiano Massao Tashima; Rosilene Fressatti Cardoso; Rúbia Andreia F de Pádua; Isolde Previdelli; Maria Dalva de Barros Carvalho; Sandra Marisa Pelloso
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.846

2.  Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.

Authors:  Ana Caroline N Botelho; Juliana G Oliveira; Andreia P Damasco; Késia T B Santos; Ana Flávia M Ferreira; Gabriel T Rocha; Penélope S Marinho; Rita B G Bornia; Tatiana C A Pinto; Marco A Américo; Sergio E L Fracalanzza; Lúcia M Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.