Literature DB >> 24120686

Context-dependent differences in grooming behavior among the NIH heterogeneous stock and the Roman high- and low-avoidance rats.

C Estanislau1, S Díaz-Morán, T Cañete, G Blázquez, A Tobeña, A Fernández-Teruel.   

Abstract

Grooming occurs during/after stress and seems to accompany dearousal. Here, grooming was investigated under testing situations involving different levels of aversiveness, taking advantage of differences among three rat strains in fearfulness/anxiety. Inbred Roman High Avoidance (RHA-I) rats are less anxious/fearful than inbred Roman Low Avoidance (RLA-I). The outbred genetically heterogeneous stock of rats (NIH-HS), which resembles the RLA-I in many behavioral traits, was also studied. Adult male rats (RLA-I: n=9, RHA-I: n=10, NIH-HS: n=12) were observed for 30min in: a novel open-field, a novel hole-board and in the home-cage. They were also observed during two-way active avoidance training. Differences in grooming depended on test situation: (a) No differences were found in the home-cage. (b) While tested in a novel environment, RHA-I showed less grooming activity than the other rats. (c) After avoidance responses appeared, differences among the strains were opposite to the observed in novelty tests. Furthermore, results suggest that (i) grooming is mostly suppressed when assured aversive experience is under way; (ii) rostral grooming prevails when experience with aversive stimuli is unpredictable (novelty) or potential (avoidance training); (iii) body grooming increases for a period in novel environments. In general, our results support that grooming takes place during dearousal.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grooming; Home-cage; NIH heterogeneous rat stock; Novelty; Roman strains; Two-way active avoidance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24120686     DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  8 in total

1.  Meanings of self-grooming depend on an inverted U-shaped function with aversiveness.

Authors:  Alberto Fernández-Teruel; Celio Estanislau
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Bidirectional genetic selection of behaviors involved in social interaction of Wistar rats.

Authors:  R Bonuti; S Morato
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.904

Review 3.  Neurobiology of rodent self-grooming and its value for translational neuroscience.

Authors:  Allan V Kalueff; Adam Michael Stewart; Cai Song; Kent C Berridge; Ann M Graybiel; John C Fentress
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Early postnatal hypoxia induces behavioral deficits but not morphological damage in the hippocampus in adolescent rats.

Authors:  V Riljak; Z Laštůvka; J Mysliveček; V Borbélyová; J Otáhal
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.881

5.  High-fructose diet during adolescent development increases neuroinflammation and depressive-like behavior without exacerbating outcomes after stroke.

Authors:  C S Harrell; C Zainaldin; D McFarlane; M M Hyer; D Stein; I Sayeed; G N Neigh
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 19.227

6.  Prepulse inhibition predicts spatial working memory performance in the inbred Roman high- and low-avoidance rats and in genetically heterogeneous NIH-HS rats: relevance for studying pre-attentive and cognitive anomalies in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ignasi Oliveras; Cristóbal Río-Álamos; Toni Cañete; Gloria Blázquez; Esther Martínez-Membrives; Osvaldo Giorgi; Maria G Corda; Adolf Tobeña; Alberto Fernández-Teruel
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Neonatal handling decreases unconditioned anxiety, conditioned fear, and improves two-way avoidance acquisition: a study with the inbred Roman high (RHA-I)- and low-avoidance (RLA-I) rats of both sexes.

Authors:  Cristóbal Río-Ȧlamos; Ignasi Oliveras; Toni Cañete; Gloria Blázquez; Esther Martínez-Membrives; Adolf Tobeña; Alberto Fernández-Teruel
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Delay and trace fear conditioning in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice: issues of measurement and performance.

Authors:  Megan E Tipps; Jonathan D Raybuck; Kari J Buck; K Matthew Lattal
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.460

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.