Literature DB >> 24120653

A unifying framework for standard and covariate-adaptive randomization procedures based on minimizing suitable imbalance functions.

Vance W Berger1.   

Abstract

Minimization is based on minimizing an imbalance function defined in terms of one or more covariates. Standard (non-adaptive) randomization procedures, on the other hand, generally do not specify or try to minimize an imbalance function. However, it turns out that they may be formulated in this manner. Doing so places adaptive and standard randomization procedures within the same framework, and also suggests novel randomization procedures that combine the best elements of both. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive randomization; Allocation concealment; Imbalance function

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24120653      PMCID: PMC3850514          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  11 in total

1.  Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  V W Berger; D V Exner
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-08

2.  Understanding self-rated health.

Authors:  Peter M Fayers; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Minimization, by its nature, precludes allocation concealment, and invites selection bias.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Sensitivity designs for preventing bias replication in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vance W Berger; William C Grant; Laura F Vazquez
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Misguided precedent is not a reason to use permuted blocks.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.887

6.  Do not use blocked randomization.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.887

7.  Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.

Authors:  Vance W Berger; Anastasia Ivanova; Maria Deloria Knoll
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Minimization: not all it's cracked up to be.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 9.  Block urn design - a new randomization algorithm for sequential trials with two or more treatments and balanced or unbalanced allocation.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Yanqiu Weng
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 10.  The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. a review.

Authors:  Neil W Scott; Gladys C McPherson; Craig R Ramsay; Marion K Campbell
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.