| Literature DB >> 24120526 |
Shivaprasad Manjappa1, Pavan Kumar Bhamidipati1, Keith E Stokerl-Goldstein2, John F DiPersio2, Geoffrey L Uy2, Peter Westervelt2, Jingxia Liu3, Mark A Schroeder2, Ravi Vij2, Camille N Abboud2, Todd A Fehniger2, Amanda F Cashen2, Iskra Pusic2, Meagan Jacoby2, Srinidhi J Meera2, Rizwan Romee4.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) has been associated with a reduced risk of relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the influence of the conditioning regimen on this protective effect of CMV reactivation after allo-HCT is relatively unexplored. To address this, we evaluated the risk of relapse in 264 AML patients who received T cell-replete, 6/6 HLA matched sibling or 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donor transplantation at a single institution between 2006 and 2011. Of these 264 patients, 206 received myeloablative (MA) and 58 received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. CMV reactivation was observed in 88 patients with MA conditioning and 37 patients with RIC. At a median follow-up of 299 days, CMV reactivation was associated with significantly lower risk of relapse in patients who received MA conditioning both in univariate (P = .01) and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio, .5246; P = .006); however, CMV reactivation did not significantly affect the risk of relapse in our RIC cohort. These results confirm the protective effect of CMV reactivation on relapse in AML patients after allo-HCT reported by previous studies but suggest this protective effect of CMV reactivation on relapse is influenced by the conditioning regimen used with the transplant.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; CMV; Myeloablative; Reduced intensity; Relapse
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24120526 PMCID: PMC4029772 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742