Literature DB >> 24120502

Cancer registration, public health and the reform of the European data protection framework: Abandoning or improving European public health research?

Mette Rye Andersen1, Hans H Storm2.   

Abstract

The importance of cancer- and other disease registries for planning, management and evaluation of healthcare systems has been shown repeatedly during the last 50 years. Complete and unbiased population-level analyses on routinely collected, individual data concerning health and personal characteristics can address significant concerns about risk factors for cancer and provide sound evidence about public health and the effectiveness of healthcare systems. The existence of quality controlled and comprehensive data in registries, allowed to be used for quality control, research and public health purposes are taken as granted by most health professionals and researchers. However, the current revision of the European Union (EU) data protection framework suggests a harmonisation of requirements for confidentiality and individual consent to data processing, likely at the expense of proper use of registry data in the health sector. Consequences of excessive confidentiality rules that may lead to missed data linkages have been simulated. The simulations provide one possible explanation for observed heterogeneity among some cancer incidence data. Further, public health, quality control and epidemiological research on large populations can no longer provide evidence for health interventions, if requirements for consent renders research impossible or where attempts to obtain consent from each data subject generates biased results. Health professionals should engage in the on-going debate on the Commission's proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation. The nature and use of registry data in public health research must be explained and known to policy-makers and the public. Use of cancer registry data and other epidemiological activity will terminate abruptly if an unnecessarily strict EU data protection regulation is adopted. Research based interventions, as well as the international recognised standing of cancer registries and register-based research institutions in Europe are at stake.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer registration; Cancer registry; Confidentiality; Consent; EU data protection; Epidemiology; Ethical guidelines; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24120502     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  13 in total

1.  Big data and biomedical informatics: a challenging opportunity.

Authors:  R Bellazzi
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-05-22

2.  Survival for oesophageal, stomach and small intestine cancers in Europe 1999-2007: Results from EUROCARE-5.

Authors:  L A Anderson; A Tavilla; H Brenner; S Luttmann; C Navarro; A T Gavin; B Holleczek; B T Johnston; M B Cook; F Bannon; M Sant
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).

Authors:  Claudia Allemani; Hannah K Weir; Helena Carreira; Rhea Harewood; Devon Spika; Xiao-Si Wang; Finian Bannon; Jane V Ahn; Christopher J Johnson; Audrey Bonaventure; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Charles Stiller; Gulnar Azevedo e Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Bernard Rachet; Matthew J Soeberg; Hui You; Tomohiro Matsuda; Magdalena Bielska-Lasota; Hans Storm; Thomas C Tucker; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Assessing the Legal Aspects of Information Security Requirements for Health Care in 3 Countries: Scoping Review and Framework Development.

Authors:  Prosper Kandabongee Yeng; Muhammad Ali Fauzi; Luyi Sun; Bian Yang
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-05-25

5.  Population attitudes towards research use of health care registries: a population-based survey in Finland.

Authors:  Katariina Eloranta; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  The promotion of data sharing in pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  Nayha Sethi
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  2014-06

7.  Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper.

Authors:  P G Casali; P Bruzzi; J Bogaerts; J-Y Blay
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Cancer registries in Europe-going forward is the only option.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Forsea
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-05-12

9.  The European Parliament proposal for the new EU General Data Protection Regulation may severely restrict European epidemiological research.

Authors:  Olof Nyrén; Magnus Stenbeck; Henrik Grönberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  A Randomised Controlled Trial of Consent Procedures for the Use of Residual Tissues for Medical Research: Preferences of and Implications for Patients, Research and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  S Rebers; E Vermeulen; A P Brandenburg; T J Stoof; B Zupan-Kajcovski; W J W Bos; M J Jonker; C J Bax; W J van Driel; V J Verwaal; M W van den Brekel; J C Grutters; R A Tupker; L Plusjé; R de Bree; J H Schagen van Leeuwen; E G J Vermeulen; R A de Leeuw; R M Brohet; N K Aaronson; F E Van Leeuwen; M K Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.