Literature DB >> 24120259

Personalized tacrolimus doses determined by CYP3A5 genotype for induction and maintenance phases of kidney transplantation.

Suda Vannaprasaht1, Sirirat Reungjui, Darika Supanya, Dhavee Sirivongs, Cholatip Pongskul, Yingyos Avihingsanon, Wichittra Tassaneeyakul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 3A5 are major isoforms involved in the metabolism of tacrolimus, with the CYP3A5 gene being more polymorphic. It is hypothesized that individual variation in the metabolism of tacrolimus drug may result from genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5. It has been reported that the clearance of tacrolimus in patients with the CYP3A5*1 allele was ~2.5-fold greater than that in those with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. Recent data have also shown that polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T) of the multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) was correlated with the expression level and function of P-glycoprotein in the lower duodenum, making the relationship between polymorphism of MDR1 and the effective dose of tacrolimus a source of controversy.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the influence of genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and MDR1 on the dose requirements for the induction and maintenance phases of tacrolimus therapy in kidney transplant recipients.
METHODS: Sixty-eight kidney transplant recipients were enrolled, and their clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively reviewed after 6 months of tacrolimus administration. Genotypes of CYP3A5*1 and CYP3A5*3 and exon 26 of MDR1 (C3435T) were determined by the single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping method.
RESULTS: The frequencies of CYP3A5*3/*3, CYP3A5*1/*3, and CYP3A5*1/*1 were 44.1%, 35.3%, and 20.6%, respectively. The mean dose of tacrolimus required for the induction phase was significantly greater in the CYP3A5*1/*1 group (0.142 [0.050] mg/kg/d) than that required in the CYP3A5*1/*3 group (0.097 [0.040] mg/kg/d; P = 0.072) and in the CYP3A5*3/*3 group (0.077 [0.020] mg/kg/d; P = 0.005). The maintenance dose of tacrolimus required in the CYP3A5*1/*1 group (0.12 [0.03] mg/kg/d) was 1.3-fold higher than that in the CYP3A5*1/*3 group (0.09 [0.03] mg/kg/d; P = 0.018) and 2.4-fold higher than in the CYP3A5*3/*3 group (0.05 [0.02] mg/kg/d; P < 0.0001). No statistically significant relationship was observed between the doses of tacrolimus required for the induction and maintenance phases and MDR1 polymorphism.
CONCLUSION: Determination of the CYP3A5 genotype would be helpful in the design of adequate immunosuppressive treatment and in lowering toxicity by predicting the doses of tacrolimus required for the induction and maintenance phases in individual kidney transplant recipients.
© 2013 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP3A5 genotype; dosage regimen; induction dose; kidney transplantation; maintenance dose; tacrolimus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24120259     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  15 in total

1.  Relationships of related genetic polymorphisms and individualized medication of tacrolimus in patients with renal transplantation.

Authors:  Lin Zhu; Jing Zhang; Hongtao Song; Qinghua Wang; Jianming Tan; Weizhen Wu; Meiqin Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 2.  Biomarkers and Pharmacogenomics in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  L E Crowley; M Mekki; S Chand
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Effect of CYP3A5 genotype on hospitalization cost for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Suda Vannaprasaht; Chulaporn Limwattananon; Sirirat Anutrakulchai; Chitranon Chan-On
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-11-16

4.  Therapeutic concentration achievement and allograft survival comparing usage of conventional tacrolimus doses and CYP3A5 genotype-guided doses in renal transplantation patients.

Authors:  Sirirat Anutrakulchai; Cholatip Pongskul; Kittrawee Kritmetapak; Chulaporn Limwattananon; Suda Vannaprasaht
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Association study identifies genetic determinants and non-genetic factors on steady-state plasma and therapeutic outcome of galantamine in mixed dementia.

Authors:  Thitipon Yaowaluk; Vorapun Senanarong; Chanin Limwongse; Rasda Boonprasert; Duangkamon Bunditvorapoom; Supannee Kaewsutthi; Pornpimol Kijsanayotin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Functional CYP3A variants affecting tacrolimus trough blood concentrations in Chinese renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Dina Chen; Huijie Lu; Weiguo Sui; Liqing Li; Jian Xu; Tengfei Yang; Siyao Yang; Ping Zheng; Yan Chen; Jiejing Chen; Wen Xue; Qingping Li; Que Zheng; Demei Ye; Wolfgang Sadee; Danxin Wang; Wanying Qian; Liusheng Lai; Chuanjiang Li; Liang Li
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Personalized tacrolimus dose requirement by CYP3A5 but not ABCB1 or ACE genotyping in both recipient and donor after pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yi-kuan Chen; Long-zhi Han; Feng Xue; Cong-huan Shen; Jun Lu; Tai-hua Yang; Jian-jun Zhang; Qiang Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The influence of CYP3A, PPARA, and POR genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ingrid Lunde; Sara Bremer; Karsten Midtvedt; Beata Mohebi; Miriam Dahl; Stein Bergan; Anders Åsberg; Hege Christensen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Capability of utilizing CYP3A5 polymorphisms to predict therapeutic dosage of tacrolimus at early stage post-renal transplantation.

Authors:  Takenori Niioka; Hideaki Kagaya; Mitsuru Saito; Takamitsu Inoue; Kazuyuki Numakura; Tomonori Habuchi; Shigeru Satoh; Masatomo Miura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing in African-American kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  K Sanghavi; R C Brundage; M B Miller; D P Schladt; A K Israni; W Guan; W S Oetting; R B Mannon; R P Remmel; A J Matas; P A Jacobson
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.550

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.