Literature DB >> 24119982

A single-center experience with the ross procedure over 20 years.

Martin Andreas1, Gernot Seebacher2, Eric Reida2, Dominik Wiedemann2, Christiane Pees3, Raphael Rosenhek4, Georg Heinze5, Anton Moritz6, Alfred Kocher2, Guenther Laufer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Ross procedure offers several potential advantages in a young patient population. The widespread use of the procedure is still limited due to the technical challenge. Pulmonary homograft stenosis and autograft dilatation remain a matter of concern. We present the long-term outcome in a single center with special emphasis on mortality and need for valvular reintervention.
METHODS: All patients who received a Ross procedure as freestanding root replacement (modified Yacoub technique) at our institution between 1991 and 2011 were followed. Descriptive statistical methods and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 246 patients (191 males, 55 females) underwent the Ross procedure during the study period. There were 176 adults and 70 pediatric patients with an average age of 36 ± 10 and 10 ± 5 years, respectively. The median follow-up was 10 years. Twelve (4.9%) subjects were lost to follow-up. Early mortality was 1.6%. Overall mortality was comparable with an age and sex matched population for adult patients. The linearized risk for reoperation per patient-year was 0.6% for the autograft and 0.6% for the right ventricular outflow tract, with a mean time to surgery of 6.4 ± 4.9 years. Overall freedom from reintervention was 95% at 5 years, 88% at 10 years, and 81% at 15 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure provides good early results and an excellent long-term survival. It represents an excellent method of aortic valve replacement in children and young adults. Root reinforcement techniques and aortic reduction plasty may be beneficial, especially in adult patients with native aortic valve regurgitation.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119982     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Longitudinal Changes in Exercise Capacity in Patients Who Underwent Ross Procedure and Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: Does the Type of Surgery Matter?

Authors:  Daiji Takajo; Vasudha Kota; Preetha P L Balakrishnan; Marjorie Gayanilo; Chenni Sriram; Sanjeev Aggarwal
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  The Ross procedure: time for a hard look at current practices and a reexamination of the guidelines.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Ismail Bouhout
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

3.  Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure in adults.

Authors:  William H Ryan; John J Squiers; Katherine B Harrington; Tammy Goodenow; Courtney Rawitscher; Justin M Schaffer; J Michael DiMaio; William T Brinkman
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

4.  State-of-the-art: Insights from the Ross Registry.

Authors:  Buntaro Fujita; Anas Aboud; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Stephan Ensminger
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 5.  The effectiveness and safety of pulmonary autograft as living tissue in Ross procedure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Adelaide Iervolino; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-02

Review 6.  Biomechanics of Pulmonary Autograft as Living Tissue: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 7.  The Choice of Pulmonary Autograft in Aortic Valve Surgery: A State-of-the-Art Primer.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Francesca Bellomo; Pierluigi Nappi; Adelaide Iervolino; Christophe Acar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.