Kharah M Ross1, Michael L M Murphy2, Emma K Adam2, Edith Chen2, Gregory E Miller2. 1. Department of Psychology Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-2710, USA. Electronic address: kmross@u.northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Psychology Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-2710, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indices of cortisol activity, including the cortisol awakening response (CAR), diurnal slope, and cortisol output across the day (total daily output), are often studied as mechanistic indicators that could link stress with health. Yet there is a paucity of data speaking to their temporal features, particularly whether they behave in a more state- or trait-like manner across time. METHODS: To address this issue, data from 3 studies were used to assess CAR, diurnal slope and total daily output stability over different age groups and time spans: 130 healthy children and adolescents collected salivary cortisol samples 5 times/day (1, 4, 9 and 11h after wake) over 2 days at 5 visits spaced 6 months apart (Study 1); 147 adolescent girls collected saliva 6 times/day (wake, 1, 4, 9 and 14 h after wake) for 2 days at 3 visits, each a year apart (Study 2); and 47 healthy, primarily middle age adults collected saliva 6 times/day (wake, 1, 4, 9 and 14 h after wake) for 3 days at 4 visits spaced 2-3 months apart (Study 3). Stability was estimated by multilevel model-derived intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Across studies, approximately 50% of the variance in cortisol indices was attributable to day-to-day fluctuations, suggesting state-like properties. Of the indices, total daily output emerged as the most stable over time, followed by diurnal slope and CAR, but stability estimates were generally quite modest regardless of index and sample. Over time spans of >1 year, ICCs were ≤ .13. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the variance in CAR, diurnal slope and total daily output reflects day-to-day fluctuation; there was little evidence for more stable trait-like influences. These findings suggest that future research should focus on short-term fluctuations in stress, cortisol and health, as opposed to lengthy disease processes.
BACKGROUND: Indices of cortisol activity, including the cortisol awakening response (CAR), diurnal slope, and cortisol output across the day (total daily output), are often studied as mechanistic indicators that could link stress with health. Yet there is a paucity of data speaking to their temporal features, particularly whether they behave in a more state- or trait-like manner across time. METHODS: To address this issue, data from 3 studies were used to assess CAR, diurnal slope and total daily output stability over different age groups and time spans: 130 healthy children and adolescents collected salivary cortisol samples 5 times/day (1, 4, 9 and 11h after wake) over 2 days at 5 visits spaced 6 months apart (Study 1); 147 adolescent girls collected saliva 6 times/day (wake, 1, 4, 9 and 14 h after wake) for 2 days at 3 visits, each a year apart (Study 2); and 47 healthy, primarily middle age adults collected saliva 6 times/day (wake, 1, 4, 9 and 14 h after wake) for 3 days at 4 visits spaced 2-3 months apart (Study 3). Stability was estimated by multilevel model-derived intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Across studies, approximately 50% of the variance in cortisol indices was attributable to day-to-day fluctuations, suggesting state-like properties. Of the indices, total daily output emerged as the most stable over time, followed by diurnal slope and CAR, but stability estimates were generally quite modest regardless of index and sample. Over time spans of >1 year, ICCs were ≤ .13. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the variance in CAR, diurnal slope and total daily output reflects day-to-day fluctuation; there was little evidence for more stable trait-like influences. These findings suggest that future research should focus on short-term fluctuations in stress, cortisol and health, as opposed to lengthy disease processes.
Authors: Evelien Platje; Robert R J M Vermeiren; Susan J T Branje; Theo A H Doreleijers; Wim H J Meeus; Hans M Koot; Tom Frijns; Pol A C van Lier; Lucres M C Jansen Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2012-07-08 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: J M Smyth; M C Ockenfels; A A Gorin; D Catley; L S Porter; C Kirschbaum; D H Hellhammer; A A Stone Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Samuele Zilioli; Richard B Slatcher; Heather Fritz; Jason C Booza; Malcolm P Cutchin Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Robert Miller; Tobias Stalder; Marc Jarczok; David M Almeida; Ellena Badrick; Meike Bartels; Dorret I Boomsma; Christopher L Coe; Marieke C J Dekker; Bonny Donzella; Joachim E Fischer; Megan R Gunnar; Meena Kumari; Florian Lederbogen; Christine Power; Carol D Ryff; S V Subramanian; Henning Tiemeier; Sarah E Watamura; Clemens Kirschbaum Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Marissa N Smith; Carly S Wilder; William C Griffith; Tomomi Workman; Beti Thompson; Russel Dills; Gretchen Onstad; Melinda Vredevoogd; Eric M Vigoren; Elaine M Faustman Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2015 Impact factor: 2.658