Literature DB >> 24119467

The Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire, patient factors and referral for treatment.

A Staniszewska1, A Tambyraja, E Afolabi, P Bachoo, J Brittenden.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) could be used to help inform a patient pathway for referral and treatment of varicose veins. We aimed to determine 1) which patient and vein characteristics affected the AVVQ score, and 2) whether scores differed between those who were and were not offered treatment.
METHODS: Patients completed the AVVQ at the clinic prior to being seen. Treatment was offered to patients with symptoms, and duplex detected truncal incompetence by surgeons blinded to the score.
RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive patients completed the AVVQ: 199 were valid questionnaires. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a worse quality of life were female gender (p = .034, 3.14 mean unit increase in AVVQ), and bilateral varicose veins (10.25 unit increase, p < .001). For patients with C2 disease, only the presence of bilateral veins was significant. Overall, the AVVQ score was higher in those patients offered treatment than in those who were not (mean 20.3 [SD = 9.9] vs. 17.3 [SD = 10.3], p = .023), which equates to a 2.74 unit increase. This was not significant in patients with C2 disease.
CONCLUSION: It is unlikely that a threshold AVVQ score could be used to aid referral of patients with C2 disease. The distribution of veins (unilateral vs. bilateral) must be adjusted for when reporting AVVQ scores.
Copyright © 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire; Bilateral; CEAP; Endovenous; Gender

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119467     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  7 in total

1.  Non-randomized comparative study of three methods for great saphenous vein ablation associated with mini-phlebectomy; 48 months clinical and sonographic outcome.

Authors:  Aram Baram; Dezhin Faeq Rashid; Bashar Hana Saqat
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-02

Review 2.  S2k guidelines: diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  F Pannier; T Noppeney; J Alm; F X Breu; G Bruning; I Flessenkämper; H Gerlach; K Hartmann; B Kahle; H Kluess; E Mendoza; D Mühlberger; A Mumme; H Nüllen; K Rass; S Reich-Schupke; D Stenger; M Stücker; C G Schmedt; T Schwarz; J Tesmann; J Teßarek; S Werth; E Valesky
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.198

3.  A narrative review of the quality of life scales specific for chronic venous diseases.

Authors:  Zhoupeng Wu; Yukui Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Determination of the longitudinal sensitivity of the AVVQ-Brazil Quality of Life Questionnaire to non-surgical treatment of chronic venous disease.

Authors:  Flávia de Jesus Leal; Renata Cardoso Couto; Guilherme Benjamin Brandão Pitta; Solange Andreoni
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2019-11-18

5.  Age is not a barrier to good outcomes following ambulatory high ligation and stripping for varicose veins: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  ChuWen Chen; YuTing Cai; XiaoQing Long; Xiang Fan; Ding Yuan; Yi Yang; Bin Huang; JiChun Zhao; YuKui Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcome Following Ambulatory High Ligation and Stripping for Lower Varicose Veins: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chu Wen Chen; Yu T Cai; Jia R Wang; Zhou P Wu; Yang Liu; Bing Huang; Yi Yang; Ding Yuan; Yu K Ma; Ji C Zhao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  Nonthermal Endovenous Procedures for Varicose Veins: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-06-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.